178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32384956)
21. Narrow size distribution of microbubbles for enhancement of harmonic imaging.
Moon H; Yu J; Park S; Chang JH; Song TK; Kim H
J Biomed Nanotechnol; 2013 May; 9(5):845-8. PubMed ID: 23802414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Monitoring of acoustic cavitation in microbubble-presented focused ultrasound exposure using gradient-echo MRI.
Wu CH; Liu HL; Ho CT; Hsu PH; Fan CH; Yeh CK; Kang ST; Chen WS; Wang FN; Peng HH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jan; 51(1):311-318. PubMed ID: 31125166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Ultrasound Contrast between H
Kim DS; Song N; Lee D; Kim GW
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Oct; 13(21):. PubMed ID: 37958215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined targeted microbubbles for diagnosis of highly aggressive papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Ma J; Wang Y; Xi X; Tang J; Wang L; Wang L; Wang D; Liang X; Zhang B
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1052862. PubMed ID: 36936158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Detection of individual microbubbles of ultrasound contrast agents: imaging of free-floating and targeted bubbles.
Klibanov AL; Rasche PT; Hughes MS; Wojdyla JK; Galen KP; Wible JH; Brandenburger GH
Invest Radiol; 2004 Mar; 39(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 15076011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantum-dot-modified microbubbles with bi-mode imaging capabilities.
Ke H; Xing Z; Zhao B; Wang J; Liu J; Guo C; Yue X; Liu S; Tang Z; Dai Z
Nanotechnology; 2009 Oct; 20(42):425105. PubMed ID: 19779227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Monodisperse versus Polydisperse Ultrasound Contrast Agents: In Vivo Sensitivity and safety in Rat and Pig.
Helbert A; Gaud E; Segers T; Botteron C; Frinking P; Jeannot V
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 46(12):3339-3352. PubMed ID: 33008649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Lung surfactant microbubbles increase lipophilic drug payload for ultrasound-targeted delivery.
Sirsi SR; Fung C; Garg S; Tianning MY; Mountford PA; Borden MA
Theranostics; 2013; 3(6):409-19. PubMed ID: 23781287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparing Strategies for Magnetic Functionalization of Microbubbles.
Beguin E; Bau L; Shrivastava S; Stride E
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2019 Jan; 11(2):1829-1840. PubMed ID: 30574777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents for diagnostic and therapeutic applications: current status and future design.
Kang ST; Yeh CK
Chang Gung Med J; 2012; 35(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 22537927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Nano Air Seeds Trapped in Mesoporous Janus Nanoparticles Facilitate Cavitation and Enhance Ultrasound Imaging.
Tamarov K; Sviridov A; Xu W; Malo M; Andreev V; Timoshenko V; Lehto VP
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2017 Oct; 9(40):35234-35243. PubMed ID: 28921952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Needle size and injection rate impact microbubble contrast agent population.
Talu E; Powell RL; Longo ML; Dayton PA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1182-5. PubMed ID: 18295967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Role of Microbubble Echo Phase Lag in Multipulse Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.
Tremblay-Darveau C; Sheeran PS; Vu CK; Williams R; Zhang Z; Bruce M; Burns PN
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Aug; 65(8):1389-1401. PubMed ID: 29993575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mechanical and dynamic characteristics of encapsulated microbubbles coupled by magnetic nanoparticles as multifunctional imaging and drug delivery agents.
Guo G; Lu L; Yin L; Tu J; Guo X; Wu J; Xu D; Zhang D
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(22):6729-47. PubMed ID: 25327566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A novel technology: microfluidic devices for microbubble ultrasound contrast agent generation.
Lin H; Chen J; Chen C
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Sep; 54(9):1317-30. PubMed ID: 27016369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of ultrasound induced cavitation on magnetic resonance imaging contrast in the rat liver in the presence of macromolecular contrast agent.
Frulio N; Trillaud H; Deckers R; Lepreux S; Moonen C; Quesson B
Invest Radiol; 2010 May; 45(5):282-7. PubMed ID: 20375844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Magnetic targeting to enhance microbubble delivery in an occluded microarterial bifurcation.
de Saint Victor M; Carugo D; Barnsley LC; Owen J; Coussios CC; Stride E
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(18):7451-7470. PubMed ID: 28796644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Impact of instantaneous uniformity of SonoVue microbubbles on binding characteristics of a new contrast agent targeted to choriocarcinoma cells in vitro].
Zhou LX; Ding H; Jia CX; Li Y; Wei Q
Ai Zheng; 2008 Jul; 27(7):692-7. PubMed ID: 18606060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Use of Acoustic Radiation Force Decorrelation-Weighted Pulse Inversion for Enhanced Ultrasound Contrast Imaging.
Herbst EB; Unnikrishnan S; Wang S; Klibanov AL; Hossack JA; Mauldin FW
Invest Radiol; 2017 Feb; 52(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 27495188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Self-assembled microbubbles as contrast agents for ultrasound/magnetic resonance dual-modality imaging.
Song S; Guo H; Jiang Z; Jin Y; Wu Y; An X; Zhang Z; Sun K; Dou H
Acta Biomater; 2015 Sep; 24():266-78. PubMed ID: 26112374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
