BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32387217)

  • 1. Impact of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Risk Profiles of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Patients.
    Craig P; Rogers T; Zou Q; Torguson R; Okubagzi PG; Ehsan A; Goncalves J; Hahn C; Bilfinger T; Buchanan S; Garrett R; Thourani VH; Corso P; Shults C; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Aug; 21(8):959-963. PubMed ID: 32387217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.
    Elbadawi A; Saad M; Elgendy IY; Barssoum K; Omer MA; Soliman A; Almahmoud MF; Ogunbayo GO; Mentias A; Gilani S; Jneid H; Aronow HD; Kleiman N; Abbott JD
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Sep; 12(18):1811-1822. PubMed ID: 31537280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trends in volume and risk profiles of patients undergoing isolated surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Mori M; Bin Mahmood SU; Geirsson A; Yun JJ; Cleman MW; Forrest JK; Mangi AA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):E337-E342. PubMed ID: 30269424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Readmission-related outcomes of surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients aged 65 or older with bicuspid aortic valve.
    Ogami T; Yousef S; Brown JA; Kliner DE; Toma C; Serna-Gallegos D; Doshi N; Wang Y; Sultan I
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2024 Jun; 63():16-20. PubMed ID: 38233251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes of intermediate-risk patients treated with transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: A single center 20-year experience.
    Garcia S; Kelly R; Mbai M; Gurevich S; Oestreich B; Yannopoulos D; Adabag S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):390-398. PubMed ID: 29316204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in California: Influence on aortic valve surgery.
    Maximus S; Milliken JC; Danielsen B; Shemin R; Khan J; Carey JS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Apr; 155(4):1447-1456. PubMed ID: 29554785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in female in the United States.
    Ando T; Akintoye E; Telila T; Briasoulis A; Takagi H; Schreiber T; Afonso L; Grines CL
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 91(4):813-819. PubMed ID: 28990736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship Between Hospital Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Volume and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes.
    Hirji SA; McCarthy E; Kim D; McGurk S; Ejiofor J; Ramirez-Del Val F; Kolkailah AA; Rosner B; Shook D; Nyman C; Berry N; Sobieszczyk P; Pelletier M; Shah P; O'Gara P; Kaneko T
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Feb; 13(3):335-343. PubMed ID: 32029250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trends in Isolated Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement According to Hospital-Based Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Volumes.
    Kundi H; Strom JB; Valsdottir LR; Elmariah S; Popma JJ; Shen C; Yeh RW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Nov; 11(21):2148-2156. PubMed ID: 30343022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in non-teaching hospitals.
    Ando T; Adegbala O; Villablanca PA; Briasoulis A; Takagi H; Grines CL; Schreiber T; Nazif T; Kodali S; Afonso L
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 93(5):954-962. PubMed ID: 30408309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increasing Wait-Time Mortality for Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Population-Level Study of the Transition in Practice From Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Albassam O; Henning KA; Qiu F; Cram P; Sheth TN; Ko DT; Woodward G; Austin PC; Wijeysundera HC
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 13(11):e009297. PubMed ID: 33167700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with end stage renal disease.
    Khan MZ; Khan MU; Kalra A; Krupica T; Kaluski E; Khan SU
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 96(5):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 33034959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Trends in Utilization and Propensity-Matched Analysis of In-Hospital Outcomes.
    Gupta T; Khera S; Kolte D; Goel K; Kalra A; Villablanca PA; Aronow HD; Abbott JD; Fonarow GC; Taub CC; Kleiman NS; Weisz G; Inglessis I; Elmariah S; Rihal CS; Garcia MJ; Bhatt DL
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Apr; 11(4):e006179. PubMed ID: 29643130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choice of Treatment for Aortic Valve Stenosis in the Era of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Eastern Denmark (2005 to 2015).
    De Backer O; Luk NH; Olsen NT; Olsen PS; Søndergaard L
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(11):1152-8. PubMed ID: 27209252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-surgical-risk patients: An updated meta-analysis.
    Goel S; Pasam RT; Wats K; Patel J; Chava S; Gotesman J; Malik BA; Frankel R; Shani J; Gidwani U
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 96(1):169-178. PubMed ID: 31631514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.
    Little SH; Oh JK; Gillam L; Sengupta PP; Orsinelli DA; Cavalcante JL; Chang JD; Adams DH; Zorn GL; Pollak AW; Abdelmoneim SS; Reardon MJ; Qiao H; Popma JJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27313280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aortic valve replacement in patients with preexisting liver disease: Transfemoral approach with favorable survival.
    Seppelt PC; Zappel J; Weiler H; Mas-Peiró S; Papadopoulos N; Walther T; Zeiher AM; Fichtlscherer S; Vasa-Nicotera M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jan; 95(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 31033152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characteristics of and current practice patterns of pacing for high-degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in comparison to surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Misumida N; Pagath M; Ogunbayo GO; Wilson RE; Kim SM; Abdel-Latif A; Elayi CS
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jun; 93(7):E385-E390. PubMed ID: 30302907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contemporary Trends and Outcomes of Percutaneous and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Cancer.
    Guha A; Dey AK; Arora S; Cavender MA; Vavalle JP; Sabik JF; Jimenez E; Jneid H; Addison D
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 Jan; 9(2):e014248. PubMed ID: 31960751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-Year Outcomes in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Randomized to Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: The All-Comers Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Søndergaard L; Steinbrüchel DA; Ihlemann N; Nissen H; Kjeldsen BJ; Petursson P; Ngo AT; Olsen NT; Chang Y; Franzen OW; Engstrøm T; Clemmensen P; Olsen PS; Thyregod HG
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27296202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.