788 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32387325)
1. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Obese Women: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.
Viteri OA; Tabsh KK; Alrais MA; Salazar XC; Lopez JM; Fok RY; Chauhan SP; Sibai BM
Am J Perinatol; 2021 Aug; 38(S 01):e123-e128. PubMed ID: 32299108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical methods for induction of labour.
Jozwiak M; Bloemenkamp KW; Kelly AJ; Mol BW; Irion O; Boulvain M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Mar; (3):CD001233. PubMed ID: 22419277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter combined with a single dose of vaginal misoprostol tablet or intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
Garg R; Bagga R; Kumari A; Kalra J; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Feb; 42(2):232-238. PubMed ID: 34027782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intracervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for labor induction with Bishop score ≤3: a secondary analysis.
Gagnon J; Corlin T; Berghella V; Hoffman MK; Sciscione A; Marie PS; Schoen CN
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jul; 3(4):100350. PubMed ID: 33757937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical methods for induction of labour.
de Vaan MD; Ten Eikelder ML; Jozwiak M; Palmer KR; Davies-Tuck M; Bloemenkamp KW; Mol BWJ; Boulvain M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Mar; 3(3):CD001233. PubMed ID: 36996264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of mechanical and nonmechanical methods of cervix ripening in women with pre-labor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial.
Mokhtarpour S; Sahhaf F; Vahedi L; Sani A
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Apr; 5(4):100868. PubMed ID: 36690182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Methods for Inducing Labor].
Girault A
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 31669528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Ghosh A; Lattey KR; Kelly AJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 12(12):CD006901. PubMed ID: 27918616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combination of Foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Carbone JF; Tuuli MG; Fogertey PJ; Roehl KA; Macones GA
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Feb; 121(2 Pt 1):247-252. PubMed ID: 23303106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized trial of Foley Bulb for Labor Induction in Premature Rupture of Membranes in Nulliparas (FLIP).
Amorosa JMH; Stone J; Factor SH; Booker W; Newland M; Bianco A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):360.e1-360.e7. PubMed ID: 28479288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety.
Sanchez-Ramos L; Levine LD; Sciscione AC; Mozurkewich EL; Ramsey PS; Adair CD; Kaunitz AM; McKinney JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; 230(3S):S669-S695. PubMed ID: 38462252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Misoprostol combined with cervical single or double balloon catheters versus misoprostol alone for labor induction of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Ornat L; Alonso-Ventura V; Bueno-Notivol J; Chedraui P; Pérez-López FR;
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Oct; 33(20):3453-3468. PubMed ID: 30741051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
Gaudineau A; Senat MV; Ehlinger V; Gallini A; Morin M; Olivier P; Roth E; Orusco E; Javoise S; Fort J; Lavergne C; Arnaud C; Rozenberg P; Vayssiere C;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):542.e1-542.e8. PubMed ID: 33887241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methods of induction of labor in women with obesity: A secondary analysis of two multicenter randomized controlled trials.
Croll DMR; De Vaan MDT; Moes SL; Bloemenkamp KWM; Ten Eikelder MLG; De Heus R; Jozwiak M; Kooiman J; Mol BW; Verhoeven CJM; De Boer MA
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Mar; 103(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 38183287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Misoprostol With Foley Bulb Compared With Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Al-Ibraheemi Z; Brustman L; Bimson BE; Porat N; Rosenn B
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 29215514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
