794 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32387325)
21. [Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial].
Oliveira MV; Oberst PV; Leite GK; Aguemi A; Kenj G; Leme VD; Sass N
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 32(7):346-51. PubMed ID: 21152844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparing Foley Catheter to Prostaglandins for Cervical Ripening in Multiparous Women.
Manly E; Hiersch L; Moloney A; Berndl A; Mei-Dan E; Zaltz A; Barrett J; Melamed N
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 Jul; 42(7):853-860. PubMed ID: 32005633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Foley catheter vs prostaglandin as ripening agent in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes.
Mackeen AD; Walker L; Ruhstaller K; Schuster M; Sciscione A
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Sep; 114(9):686-92. PubMed ID: 25170038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks' gestation.
Wing DA; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 179(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9704771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
Gomez HB; Hoffman MK; Caplan R; Ruhstaller K; Young MHH; Sciscione AC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (1):CD000941. PubMed ID: 12535398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Six vs 12 hours of Foley catheter balloon placement in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes: a randomized controlled trial.
Kamarudzman N; Omar SZ; Gan F; Hong J; Hamdan M; Tan PC
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101142. PubMed ID: 37643690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section.
Jozwiak M; Dodd JM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; (3):CD009792. PubMed ID: 23543582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.
Lee HH; Huang BS; Cheng M; Yeh CC; Lin IC; Horng HC; Huang HY; Lee WL; Wang PH
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32168947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Nulliparous Participants Undergoing Labor Induction by Cervical Ripening Method.
Andrikopoulou M; Bushman ET; Rice MM; Grobman WA; Reddy UM; Silver RM; El-Sayed YY; Rouse DJ; Saade GR; Thorp JM; Chauhan SP; Costantine MM; Chien EK; Casey BM; Srinivas SK; Swamy GK; Simhan HN;
Am J Perinatol; 2023 Jul; 40(10):1061-1070. PubMed ID: 34352922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Maternal and neonatal outcomes with mechanical cervical dilation plus misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone for cervical ripening; a systematic review of literature and metaanalysis.
Nasioudis D; Kim SW; Schoen C; Levine LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2019 May; 1(2):101-111. PubMed ID: 33345815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.
Pimentel VM; Arabkhazaeli M; Moon JY; Wang A; Kapedani A; Bernstein PS; Tropper PJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):614.e1-614.e8. PubMed ID: 29614276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cervical ripening balloon with and without oxytocin in multiparas: a randomized controlled trial.
Bauer AM; Lappen JR; Gecsi KS; Hackney DN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 219(3):294.e1-294.e6. PubMed ID: 29763609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.
Moraes Filho OB; Albuquerque RM; Cecatti JG
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1045-52. PubMed ID: 20636243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women.
Culver J; Strauss RA; Brody S; Dorman K; Timlin S; McMahon MJ
Am J Perinatol; 2004 Apr; 21(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 15085496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared.
Greybush M; Singleton C; Atlas RO; Balducci J; Rust OA
J Reprod Med; 2001 Jan; 46(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 11209625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Hofmeyr GJ; Gulmezoglu AM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (3):CD000941. PubMed ID: 11686970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Labor Induction Outcomes with Outpatient Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening among Low-Risk Women.
Kandahari N; Schneider AN; Tucker LS; Raine-Bennett TR; Mohta VJ
Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e818-e826. PubMed ID: 36130669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
