194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32388466)
1. Preparation of a radiobiology beam line at the 18 MeV proton cyclotron facility at CNA.
Baratto-Roldán A; Jiménez-Ramos MDC; Jimeno S; Huertas P; García-López J; Gallardo MI; Cortés-Giraldo MA; Espino JM
Phys Med; 2020 Jun; 74():19-29. PubMed ID: 32388466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Design and verification of an external radiobiological beam port on a 16.5 MeV GE PETtrace proton cyclotron.
Asp J; Santos AMC; Moghaddasi L; Afshar SV; Bezak E
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 31778235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An image-guided precision proton radiation platform for preclinical in vivo research.
Ford E; Emery R; Huff D; Narayanan M; Schwartz J; Cao N; Meyer J; Rengan R; Zeng J; Sandison G; Laramore G; Mayr N
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 27973343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new facility for proton radiobiology at the Trento proton therapy centre: Design and implementation.
Tommasino F; Rovituso M; Bortoli E; La Tessa C; Petringa G; Lorentini S; Verroi E; Simeonov Y; Weber U; Cirrone P; Schwarz M; Durante M; Scifoni E
Phys Med; 2019 Feb; 58():99-106. PubMed ID: 30824157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.
Padilla-Cabal F; Alejandro Fragoso J; Franz Resch A; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 31661559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetry and characterization of a 25-MeV proton beam line for preclinical radiobiology research.
Constanzo J; Vanstalle M; Finck C; Brasse D; Rousseau M
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2356-2362. PubMed ID: 30924942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Charged particle radiobiology beamline using tandem accelerator-based MeV protons and carbon ions: a pilot study on the track-end radiation quality, variable biological effectiveness and Bayesian beam dosimetry.
Li X; Zhang W; Wang X; Chen X; Pan H; Ruan Y; Khaledi N; Wei T; He X; Zhuo W; Shao C; Pan Y; Shi L; Fu S; Wang X
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(16):165004. PubMed ID: 31096198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo simulations of a low energy proton beamline for radiobiological experiments.
Dahle TJ; Rykkelid AM; Stokkevåg CH; Mairani A; Görgen A; Edin NJ; Rørvik E; Fjæra LF; Malinen E; Ytre-Hauge KS
Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 28464743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental depth dose curves of a 67.5 MeV proton beam for benchmarking and validation of Monte Carlo simulation.
Faddegon BA; Shin J; Castenada CM; Ramos-Méndez J; Daftari IK
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4199-210. PubMed ID: 26133619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiobiology with heavy charged particles: a historical review.
Skarsgard LD
Phys Med; 1998 Jul; 14 Suppl 1():1-19. PubMed ID: 11542635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Collimator design for spatially-fractionated proton beams for radiobiology research.
Lee E; Meyer J; Sandison G
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jul; 61(14):5378-89. PubMed ID: 27362834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Technical note: Providing proton fields down to the few-MeV level at clinical pencil beam scanning facilities for radiobiological experiments.
Behrends C; Bäumer C; Verbeek N; Ehlert J; Prasad R; Wulff J; Lühr A; Timmermann B
Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):666-674. PubMed ID: 34855985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Monte Carlo study for the calculation of the average linear energy transfer (LET) distributions for a clinical proton beam line and a radiobiological carbon ion beam line.
Romano F; Cirrone GA; Cuttone G; Rosa FD; Mazzaglia SE; Petrovic I; Fira AR; Varisano A
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 59(12):2863-82. PubMed ID: 24828462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental and Monte Carlo studies of fluence corrections for graphite calorimetry in low- and high-energy clinical proton beams.
Lourenço A; Thomas R; Bouchard H; Kacperek A; Vondracek V; Royle G; Palmans H
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4122. PubMed ID: 27370132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical Note: Defining cyclotron-based clinical scanning proton machines in a FLUKA Monte Carlo system.
Fiorini F; Schreuder N; Van den Heuvel F
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):963-970. PubMed ID: 29178429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical Note: Experimental verification of magnetic field-induced beam deflection and Bragg peak displacement for MR-integrated proton therapy.
Schellhammer SM; Gantz S; Lühr A; Oborn BM; Bussmann M; Hoffmann AL
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3429-3434. PubMed ID: 29763970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consistency in quality correction factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in scanned proton beam therapy.
Sorriaux J; Testa M; Paganetti H; Bertrand D; Lee JA; Palmans H; Vynckier S; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4919-4927. PubMed ID: 28656604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical note: Extraction of proton pencil beam energy spectrum from measured integral depth dose in a cyclotron proton beam system.
Yao W; Farr JB
Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):7504-7511. PubMed ID: 34609749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of penh, fluka, and Geant4/topas for absorbed dose calculations in air cavities representing ionization chambers in high-energy photon and proton beams.
Baumann KS; Horst F; Zink K; Gomà C
Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4639-4653. PubMed ID: 31350915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new emittance selection system to maximize beam transmission for low-energy beams in cyclotron-based proton therapy facilities with gantry.
Maradia V; Meer D; Weber DC; Lomax AJ; Schippers JM; Psoroulas S
Med Phys; 2021 Dec; 48(12):7613-7622. PubMed ID: 34655083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
