These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32388466)
1. Preparation of a radiobiology beam line at the 18 MeV proton cyclotron facility at CNA. Baratto-Roldán A; Jiménez-Ramos MDC; Jimeno S; Huertas P; García-López J; Gallardo MI; Cortés-Giraldo MA; Espino JM Phys Med; 2020 Jun; 74():19-29. PubMed ID: 32388466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Design and verification of an external radiobiological beam port on a 16.5 MeV GE PETtrace proton cyclotron. Asp J; Santos AMC; Moghaddasi L; Afshar SV; Bezak E Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 31778235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An image-guided precision proton radiation platform for preclinical in vivo research. Ford E; Emery R; Huff D; Narayanan M; Schwartz J; Cao N; Meyer J; Rengan R; Zeng J; Sandison G; Laramore G; Mayr N Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 27973343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new facility for proton radiobiology at the Trento proton therapy centre: Design and implementation. Tommasino F; Rovituso M; Bortoli E; La Tessa C; Petringa G; Lorentini S; Verroi E; Simeonov Y; Weber U; Cirrone P; Schwarz M; Durante M; Scifoni E Phys Med; 2019 Feb; 58():99-106. PubMed ID: 30824157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields. Padilla-Cabal F; Alejandro Fragoso J; Franz Resch A; Georg D; Fuchs H Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 31661559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetry and characterization of a 25-MeV proton beam line for preclinical radiobiology research. Constanzo J; Vanstalle M; Finck C; Brasse D; Rousseau M Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2356-2362. PubMed ID: 30924942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Charged particle radiobiology beamline using tandem accelerator-based MeV protons and carbon ions: a pilot study on the track-end radiation quality, variable biological effectiveness and Bayesian beam dosimetry. Li X; Zhang W; Wang X; Chen X; Pan H; Ruan Y; Khaledi N; Wei T; He X; Zhuo W; Shao C; Pan Y; Shi L; Fu S; Wang X Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(16):165004. PubMed ID: 31096198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo simulations of a low energy proton beamline for radiobiological experiments. Dahle TJ; Rykkelid AM; Stokkevåg CH; Mairani A; Görgen A; Edin NJ; Rørvik E; Fjæra LF; Malinen E; Ytre-Hauge KS Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 28464743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental depth dose curves of a 67.5 MeV proton beam for benchmarking and validation of Monte Carlo simulation. Faddegon BA; Shin J; Castenada CM; Ramos-Méndez J; Daftari IK Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4199-210. PubMed ID: 26133619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiobiology with heavy charged particles: a historical review. Skarsgard LD Phys Med; 1998 Jul; 14 Suppl 1():1-19. PubMed ID: 11542635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Collimator design for spatially-fractionated proton beams for radiobiology research. Lee E; Meyer J; Sandison G Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jul; 61(14):5378-89. PubMed ID: 27362834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Technical note: Providing proton fields down to the few-MeV level at clinical pencil beam scanning facilities for radiobiological experiments. Behrends C; Bäumer C; Verbeek N; Ehlert J; Prasad R; Wulff J; Lühr A; Timmermann B Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):666-674. PubMed ID: 34855985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Monte Carlo study for the calculation of the average linear energy transfer (LET) distributions for a clinical proton beam line and a radiobiological carbon ion beam line. Romano F; Cirrone GA; Cuttone G; Rosa FD; Mazzaglia SE; Petrovic I; Fira AR; Varisano A Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 59(12):2863-82. PubMed ID: 24828462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental and Monte Carlo studies of fluence corrections for graphite calorimetry in low- and high-energy clinical proton beams. Lourenço A; Thomas R; Bouchard H; Kacperek A; Vondracek V; Royle G; Palmans H Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4122. PubMed ID: 27370132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical Note: Defining cyclotron-based clinical scanning proton machines in a FLUKA Monte Carlo system. Fiorini F; Schreuder N; Van den Heuvel F Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):963-970. PubMed ID: 29178429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical Note: Experimental verification of magnetic field-induced beam deflection and Bragg peak displacement for MR-integrated proton therapy. Schellhammer SM; Gantz S; Lühr A; Oborn BM; Bussmann M; Hoffmann AL Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3429-3434. PubMed ID: 29763970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consistency in quality correction factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in scanned proton beam therapy. Sorriaux J; Testa M; Paganetti H; Bertrand D; Lee JA; Palmans H; Vynckier S; Sterpin E Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4919-4927. PubMed ID: 28656604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical note: Extraction of proton pencil beam energy spectrum from measured integral depth dose in a cyclotron proton beam system. Yao W; Farr JB Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):7504-7511. PubMed ID: 34609749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new emittance selection system to maximize beam transmission for low-energy beams in cyclotron-based proton therapy facilities with gantry. Maradia V; Meer D; Weber DC; Lomax AJ; Schippers JM; Psoroulas S Med Phys; 2021 Dec; 48(12):7613-7622. PubMed ID: 34655083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone and mucosal dosimetry in skin radiation therapy: a Monte Carlo study using kilovoltage photon and megavoltage electron beams. Chow JC; Jiang R Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):3885-99. PubMed ID: 22642985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]