These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32388511)

  • 1. Randomized Controlled Trial of Nonsynchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Nasal CPAP after Extubation of VLBW Infants.
    Estay AS; Mariani GL; Alvarez CA; Milet B; Agost D; Avila CP; Roldan L; Abdala DA; Keller R; Galletti MF; González A;
    Neonatology; 2020; 117(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 32388511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.
    Lemyre B; Davis PG; De Paoli AG; Kirpalani H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Sep; (9):CD003212. PubMed ID: 25188554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.
    Lemyre B; Davis PG; De Paoli AG; Kirpalani H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Feb; 2(2):CD003212. PubMed ID: 28146296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.
    Lemyre B; Deguise MO; Benson P; Kirpalani H; De Paoli AG; Davis PG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Jul; 7(7):CD003212. PubMed ID: 37497794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation vs Noninvasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation as Support After Extubation of Neonates Born Extremely Preterm or With More Severe Respiratory Failure: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Zhu X; Li F; Shi Y; Feng Z; De Luca D;
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2321644. PubMed ID: 37399009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants.
    Lemyre B; Deguise MO; Benson P; Kirpalani H; Ekhaguere OA; Davis PG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Jul; 7(7):CD005384. PubMed ID: 37466143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.
    Davis PG; Lemyre B; de Paoli AG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (3):CD003212. PubMed ID: 11687052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants.
    Lemyre B; Laughon M; Bose C; Davis PG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 12(12):CD005384. PubMed ID: 27976361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reintubation rates after extubation to different non-invasive ventilation modes in preterm infants.
    Masry A; Nimeri NAMA; Koobar O; Hammoudeh S; Chandra P; Elmalik EE; Khalil AM; Mohammed N; Mahmoud NAM; Langtree LJ; Bayoumi MAA
    BMC Pediatr; 2021 Jun; 21(1):281. PubMed ID: 34134650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noninvasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation as Postextubation Support for Preterm Neonates in China: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Zhu X; Qi H; Feng Z; Shi Y; De Luca D;
    JAMA Pediatr; 2022 Jun; 176(6):551-559. PubMed ID: 35467744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unsynchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants after extubation.
    Kahramaner Z; Erdemir A; Turkoglu E; Cosar H; Sutcuoglu S; Ozer EA
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Jun; 27(9):926-9. PubMed ID: 24047121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.
    Jasani B; Nanavati R; Kabra N; Rajdeo S; Bhandari V
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(10):1546-51. PubMed ID: 26135774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Ramanathan R; Sekar KC; Rasmussen M; Bhatia J; Soll RF
    J Perinatol; 2012 May; 32(5):336-43. PubMed ID: 22301528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis and up-date.
    Li W; Long C; Zhangxue H; Jinning Z; Shifang T; Juan M; Renjun L; Yuan S
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 2015 Apr; 50(4):402-9. PubMed ID: 25418007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nasal HFOV versus nasal IPPV as a post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants-a randomised controlled trial.
    Seth S; Saha B; Saha AK; Mukherjee S; Hazra A
    Eur J Pediatr; 2021 Oct; 180(10):3151-3160. PubMed ID: 33890156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Efficacy of noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants: a Meta analysis].
    Shi HK; Liang KL; An LH; Zhang B; Zhang CY
    Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Mar; 25(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 36946166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postextubation Noninvasive Ventilation in Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    El-Farrash RA; DiBlasi RM; AbdEL-Aziz EA; El-Tahry AM; Eladawy MS; Tadros MA; Koriesh MA; Farid JV; AbdElwahab RS; Elsayed MA; Barakat NM
    Am J Perinatol; 2022 Oct; 29(14):1577-1585. PubMed ID: 33621983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ventilator-delivered nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal biphasic positive airway pressure following extubation in infants ≤1250 g birth weight: a randomized trial.
    Okur N; Buyuktiryaki M; Sari FN; Dizdar EA; Oguz SS
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Feb; 35(4):752-758. PubMed ID: 32106721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective, randomized, controlled study of NIPPV versus nCPAP in preterm and term infants with respiratory distress syndrome.
    Shi Y; Tang S; Zhao J; Shen J
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):673-8. PubMed ID: 24039148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
    Dursun M; Uslu S; Bulbul A; Celik M; Zubarioglu U; Bas EK
    J Trop Pediatr; 2019 Aug; 65(4):352-360. PubMed ID: 30239857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.