These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32388550)
1. Understanding policy change for obesity prevention: learning from sugar-sweetened beverages taxes in Mexico and Chile. Fuster M; Burrowes S; Cuadrado C; Velasco Bernal A; Lewis S; McCarthy B; Shen GC Health Promot Int; 2021 Mar; 36(1):155-164. PubMed ID: 32388550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nutrition related non-communicable diseases and sugar sweetened beverage policies: a landscape analysis in Zambia. Mukanu MM; Abdool Karim S; Hofman K; Erzse A; Thow AM Glob Health Action; 2021 Jan; 14(1):1872172. PubMed ID: 33876714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The political economy of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in Latin America: lessons from Mexico, Chile and Colombia. Carriedo A; Koon AD; Encarnación LM; Lee K; Smith R; Walls H Global Health; 2021 Jan; 17(1):5. PubMed ID: 33402166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Barriers to, and facilitators of, the adoption of a sugar sweetened beverage tax to prevent non-communicable diseases in Uganda: a policy landscape analysis. Ahaibwe G; Abdool Karim S; Thow AM; Erzse A; Hofman K Glob Health Action; 2021 Jan; 14(1):1892307. PubMed ID: 33874854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Politics of Taxes for Health: An Analysis of the Passage of the Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in Mexico. James E; Lajous M; Reich MR Health Syst Reform; 2020; 6(1):e1669122. PubMed ID: 32043913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Strengthening prevention of nutrition-related non-communicable diseases through sugar-sweetened beverages tax in Rwanda: a policy landscape analysis. Ruhara CM; Abdool Karim S; Erzse A; Thow AM; Ntirampeba S; Hofman KJ Glob Health Action; 2021 Jan; 14(1):1883911. PubMed ID: 33876706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Six lessons from introducing sweetened beverage taxes in Berkeley, Cook County, and Philadelphia: A case study comparison in agenda setting and decision making. Hagenaars LL; Jevdjevic M; Jeurissen PPT; Klazinga NS Health Policy; 2020 Sep; 124(9):932-942. PubMed ID: 32561127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Barriers to, and facilitators of, the adoption of a sugar sweetened beverage tax to prevent non-communicable diseases in Namibia: a policy landscape analysis. Amukugo HJ; Abdool Karim S; Thow AM; Erzse A; Kruger P; Karera A; Hofman K Glob Health Action; 2021 Jan; 14(1):1903213. PubMed ID: 33876708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Policy networks and competing interests in the development of the Mexican sugar-sweetened beverages tax. Carriedo A; Cairney P; Barquera S; Hawkins B BMJ Glob Health; 2023 Oct; 8(Suppl 8):. PubMed ID: 37813438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The advocacy coalition of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in Indonesia. Putri RA; Alemmario R; Melinda G; Audwina AH; Espressivo A; Herlinda O; Meilissa Y; Saminarsih DS BMJ Glob Health; 2023 Nov; 8(Suppl 8):. PubMed ID: 37984901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The political economy of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation: an analysis from seven countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Thow AM; Abdool Karim S; Mukanu MM; Ahaibwe G; Wanjohi M; Gaogane L; Amukugo HJ; Ruhara CM; Ngoma T; Asiki G; Erzse A; Hofman K Glob Health Action; 2021 Jan; 14(1):1909267. PubMed ID: 33877032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Nutrition-related non-communicable disease and sugar-sweetened beverage policies: a landscape analysis in Kenya. Wanjohi MN; Thow AM; Abdool Karim S; Asiki G; Erzse A; Mohamed SF; Pierre Donfouet HP; Juma PA; Hofman KJ Glob Health Action; 2021 Jan; 14(1):1902659. PubMed ID: 33874855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of sugar-sweetened beverages taxes to reduce obesity: evidence brief for policy. Bascuñán J; Cuadrado C Medwave; 2017 Oct; 17(8):e7054. PubMed ID: 29099817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating the potential of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages to reduce consumption and generate revenue. Andreyeva T; Chaloupka FJ; Brownell KD Prev Med; 2011 Jun; 52(6):413-6. PubMed ID: 21443899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Examining the Role and Strategies of Advocacy Coalitions in California's Statewide Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Debate (2001-2018). Garibay KK; Burke NJ; Ramírez AS; Payán DD Am J Health Promot; 2024 Jan; 38(1):101-111. PubMed ID: 37728321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chile's 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax and changes in prices and purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages: An observational study in an urban environment. Caro JC; Corvalán C; Reyes M; Silva A; Popkin B; Taillie LS PLoS Med; 2018 Jul; 15(7):e1002597. PubMed ID: 29969444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-benefit analysis of alternative tax policies on sugar-sweetened beverages in Mexico. Salgado Hernandez JC; Ng SW; Stearns SC; Trogdon JG PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292276. PubMed ID: 37788248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Policy Process And Non-State Actors' Influence On The 2014 Mexican Soda Tax. Carriedo A; Lock K; Hawkins B Health Policy Plan; 2020 Oct; 35(8):941-952. PubMed ID: 32672333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax on prices and affordability of soft drinks in Chile: A time series analysis. Cuadrado C; Dunstan J; Silva-Illanes N; Mirelman AJ; Nakamura R; Suhrcke M Soc Sci Med; 2020 Jan; 245():112708. PubMed ID: 31862547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]