181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32388717)
1. Propensity score-matched comparison between open and minimal invasive hybrid esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Hölscher AH; DeMeester TR; Schmidt H; Berlth F; Bollschweiler E
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2020 Jun; 405(4):521-532. PubMed ID: 32388717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma reduces postoperative pain and pneumonia compared to hybrid esophagectomy.
Berlth F; Plum PS; Chon SH; Gutschow CA; Bollschweiler E; Hölscher AH
Surg Endosc; 2018 Dec; 32(12):4957-4965. PubMed ID: 29931451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term outcomes following minimally invasive and open esophagectomy in Finland: A population-based study.
Sihvo E; Helminen O; Gunn J; Sipilä JOT; Rautava P; Kytö V
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1099-1104. PubMed ID: 30553631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early outcome of thoracoscopic and hybrid esophagectomy: Propensity-matched comparative analysis.
Bonavina L; Scolari F; Aiolfi A; Bonitta G; Sironi A; Saino G; Asti E
Surgery; 2016 Apr; 159(4):1073-81. PubMed ID: 26422764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A propensity-matched analysis comparing survival after primary minimally invasive esophagectomy followed by adjuvant therapy to neoadjuvant therapy for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.
Zahoor H; Luketich JD; Levy RM; Awais O; Winger DG; Gibson MK; Nason KS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Feb; 149(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25454907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The implementation of minimally-invasive esophagectomy does not impact short-term outcome in a high-volume center.
Schwameis K; Ba-Ssalamah A; Wrba F; Birner P; Prager G; Hejna M; Schmid R; Asari R; Zacherl J; Schoppmann SF
Anticancer Res; 2013 May; 33(5):2085-91. PubMed ID: 23645759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.
Glatz T; Marjanovic G; Kulemann B; Sick O; Hopt UT; Hoeppner J
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Mar; 402(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 28083680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis of NSQIP Database.
Naffouje SA; Salloum RH; Khalaf Z; Salti GI
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):2001-2010. PubMed ID: 30927192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognosis of patients with superficial T1 esophageal cancer who underwent endoscopic resection before esophagectomy-A propensity score-matched comparison.
Plum PS; Hölscher AH; Pacheco Godoy K; Schmidt H; Berlth F; Chon SH; Alakus H; Bollschweiler E
Surg Endosc; 2018 Sep; 32(9):3972-3980. PubMed ID: 29536160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally Invasive
Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands.
Seesing MFJ; Gisbertz SS; Goense L; van Hillegersberg R; Kroon HM; Lagarde SM; Ruurda JP; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Wijnhoven BPL
Ann Surg; 2017 Nov; 266(5):839-846. PubMed ID: 28796016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in oncological outcomes: comparison of the conventional and minimally invasive esophagectomy, a single institution experience.
Khan M; Muzaffar A; Syed AA; Khatak S; Khan AR; Ashraf MI
Updates Surg; 2016 Dec; 68(4):343-349. PubMed ID: 27629484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Kauppi J; Räsänen J; Sihvo E; Huuhtanen R; Nelskylä K; Salo J
Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2614-9. PubMed ID: 25480610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.
Dunn DH; Johnson EM; Morphew JA; Dilworth HP; Krueger JL; Banerji N
Dis Esophagus; 2013; 26(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 22394116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Thoracolaparoscopic vs Open McKeown's Esophagectomy.
Wang K; Zhong J; Liu Q; Lin P; Fu J
Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Feb; 113(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 33621558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Esophagectomy versus endoscopic resection for patients with early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma: A National Cancer Database propensity-matched study.
Marino KA; Sullivan JL; Weksler B
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 May; 155(5):2211-2218.e1. PubMed ID: 29455958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does delayed esophagectomy after endoscopic resection affect outcomes in patients with stage T1 esophageal cancer? A propensity score-based analysis.
Wang S; Huang Y; Xie J; Zhuge L; Shao L; Xiang J; Zhang Y; Sun Y; Hu H; Chen S; Lerut T; Luketich JD; Zhang J; Chen H
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1441-1448. PubMed ID: 28916920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cancer Recurrence After Esophagectomy: Impact of Postoperative Infection in Propensity-Matched Cohorts.
Tam V; Luketich JD; Winger DG; Sarkaria IS; Levy RM; Christie NA; Awais O; Shende MR; Nason KS
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Nov; 102(5):1638-1646. PubMed ID: 27353482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Sweet esophagectomy for Siewert type Ⅱ esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma].
Liu CQ; Xie MR; Guo MF; Sun XH; Wu HR; Sun XX; Xu MQ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 54(6):461-465. PubMed ID: 27938582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
