173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32389443)
1. Routine Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer Is Not Justified by the Clinical Trial Evidence.
Vickers A; Carlsson SV; Cooperberg M
Eur Urol; 2020 Sep; 78(3):304-306. PubMed ID: 32389443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Utility of 4Kscore
de la Calle CM; Fasulo V; Cowan JE; Lonergan PE; Maggi M; Gadzinski AJ; Yeung RA; Saita A; Cooperberg MR; Shinohara K; Carroll PR; Nguyen HG
J Urol; 2021 Feb; 205(2):452-460. PubMed ID: 32897802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy improve cancer detection in enlarged prostates?
Walton Diaz A; Hoang AN; Turkbey B; Hong CW; Truong H; Sterling T; Rais-Bahrami S; Siddiqui MM; Stamatakis L; Vourganti S; Nix J; Logan J; Harris C; Weintraub M; Chua C; Merino MJ; Choyke P; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2020-2025. PubMed ID: 23792130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Prostate Biopsy with or without Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Detection: An Observational Cohort Study.
Bryant RJ; Hobbs CP; Eyre KS; Davies LC; Sullivan ME; Shields W; Sooriakumaran P; Verrill CL; Gleeson FV; MacPherson RE; Hamdy FC; Brewster SF
J Urol; 2019 Mar; 201(3):510-519. PubMed ID: 30266332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. AUA Policy Statement on the Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis, Staging and Management of Prostate Cancer.
Fulgham PF; Rukstalis DB; Turkbey IB; Rubenstein JN; Taneja S; Carroll PR; Pinto PA; Bjurlin MA; Eggener S
J Urol; 2017 Oct; 198(4):832-838. PubMed ID: 28483574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of threshold prostate specific antigen levels to optimize the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsy.
Shakir NA; George AK; Siddiqui MM; Rothwax JT; Rais-Bahrami S; Stamatakis L; Su D; Okoro C; Raskolnikov D; Walton-Diaz A; Simon R; Turkbey B; Choyke PL; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2014 Dec; 192(6):1642-8. PubMed ID: 25117476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance (MRIAS) Trial: Use of Baseline Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Saturation Biopsy to Reduce the Frequency of Surveillance Prostate Biopsies.
Amin A; Scheltema MJ; Shnier R; Blazevski A; Moses D; Cusick T; Siriwardena A; Yuen B; van Leeuwen PJ; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Brenner P; O'Neill G; Yuen C; Delprado W; Stricker P; Thompson J
J Urol; 2020 May; 203(5):910-917. PubMed ID: 31825297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Which Patients with Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Safely Avoid Biopsy for Prostate Cancer?
Oishi M; Shin T; Ohe C; Nassiri N; Palmer SL; Aron M; Ashrafi AN; Cacciamani GE; Chen F; Duddalwar V; Stern MC; Ukimura O; Gill IS; Luis de Castro Abreu A
J Urol; 2019 Feb; 201(2):268-276. PubMed ID: 30189186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Negative Predictive Value of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging among Men with Negative Prostate Biopsy and Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen: A Clinical Outcome Retrospective Cohort Study.
Lo G; Burton KR; Haider MA; Fleshner N; Finelli A; Ghai S
J Urol; 2019 Dec; 202(6):1159-1165. PubMed ID: 31188731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Challenges in Adopting Level 1 Evidence for Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Biomarker for Prostate Cancer Screening.
Kim SJ; Vickers AJ; Hu JC
JAMA Oncol; 2018 Dec; 4(12):1663-1664. PubMed ID: 30242308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging in the early detection of prostate cancer and review of the literature on magnetic resonance imaging-stratified clinical pathways.
Shah TT; To WKL; Ahmed HU
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2017 Dec; 17(12):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 28933973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in confirming eligibility for active surveillance for men with prostate cancer.
Stamatakis L; Siddiqui MM; Nix JW; Logan J; Rais-Bahrami S; Walton-Diaz A; Hoang AN; Vourganti S; Truong H; Shuch B; Parnes HL; Turkbey B; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Simon RM; Pinto PA
Cancer; 2013 Sep; 119(18):3359-66. PubMed ID: 23821585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer using an office based magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion device.
Sonn GA; Natarajan S; Margolis DJ; MacAiran M; Lieu P; Huang J; Dorey FJ; Marks LS
J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 23158413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Re: Matthias Boschheidgen, Peter Albers, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, et al. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening at the Age of 45 Years: Results from the First Screening Round of the PROBASE Trial, Eur Urol 2024:85:105-111.
Huang TB; Ding XF
Eur Urol; 2024 Apr; 85(4):e112. PubMed ID: 38105141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Efficacy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Risk Classification for Patients with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
Recabal P; Assel M; Sjoberg DD; Lee D; Laudone VP; Touijer K; Eastham JA; Vargas HA; Coleman J; Ehdaie B
J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):374-81. PubMed ID: 26920465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiparametric MRI in biopsy guidance for prostate cancer: fusion-guided.
Rothwax JT; George AK; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():439171. PubMed ID: 25126559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The roles of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, PCA3 and prostate health index-which is the best predictor of prostate cancer after a negative biopsy?
Porpiglia F; Russo F; Manfredi M; Mele F; Fiori C; Bollito E; Papotti M; Molineris I; Passera R; Regge D
J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 24518780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
