188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32390111)
1. Test-retest repeatability and software reproducibility of myocardial flow measurements using rest/adenosine stress Rubidium-82 PET/CT with and without motion correction in healthy young volunteers.
Byrne C; Kjaer A; Olsen NE; Forman JL; Hasbak P
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 28(6):2860-2871. PubMed ID: 32390111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dependency of cardiac rubidium-82 imaging quantitative measures on age, gender, vascular territory, and software in a cardiovascular normal population.
Sunderland JJ; Pan XB; Declerck J; Menda Y
J Nucl Cardiol; 2015 Feb; 22(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 25294436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Myocardial blood flow quantification by Rb-82 cardiac PET/CT: A detailed reproducibility study between two semi-automatic analysis programs.
Dunet V; Klein R; Allenbach G; Renaud J; deKemp RA; Prior JO
J Nucl Cardiol; 2016 Jun; 23(3):499-510. PubMed ID: 25995182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intersoftware variability impacts classification of cardiac PET exams.
Oliveira JB; Sen YM; Wechalekar K
J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):2007-2012. PubMed ID: 30238299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of LVEF, LV volumes, and LV mass between Rubidium-82 PET/CT scans in young healthy volunteers using two commercially available software packages.
Byrne C; Kjaer A; Forman JL; Hasbak P
J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Aug; 27(4):1237-1245. PubMed ID: 30919271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of clinical tools for measurements of regional stress and rest myocardial blood flow assessed with 13N-ammonia PET/CT.
Slomka PJ; Alexanderson E; Jácome R; Jiménez M; Romero E; Meave A; Le Meunier L; Dalhbom M; Berman DS; Germano G; Schelbert H
J Nucl Med; 2012 Feb; 53(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 22228795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Absolute myocardial flow quantification with (82)Rb PET/CT: comparison of different software packages and methods.
Tahari AK; Lee A; Rajaram M; Fukushima K; Lodge MA; Lee BC; Ficaro EP; Nekolla S; Klein R; deKemp RA; Wahl RL; Bengel FM; Bravo PE
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Jan; 41(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 23982454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated dynamic motion correction using normalized gradient fields for
Lee BC; Moody JB; Poitrasson-Rivière A; Melvin AC; Weinberg RL; Corbett JR; Murthy VL; Ficaro EP
J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 27(6):1982-1998. PubMed ID: 30406609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and reserve (MFR) incorporated with a novel segmentation approach: Assessments of quantitative precision and the lower limit of normal MBF and MFR in patients.
Liu H; Thorn S; Wu J; Fazzone-Chettiar R; Sandoval V; Miller EJ; Sinusas AJ; Liu YH
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Aug; 28(4):1236-1248. PubMed ID: 32715416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb positron emission tomography: clinical validation with 15O-water.
Prior JO; Allenbach G; Valenta I; Kosinski M; Burger C; Verdun FR; Bischof Delaloye A; Kaufmann PA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Jun; 39(6):1037-47. PubMed ID: 22398957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fully automated, inline quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: repeatability of measurements in healthy subjects.
Brown LAE; Onciul SC; Broadbent DA; Johnson K; Fent GJ; Foley JRJ; Garg P; Chew PG; Knott K; Dall'Armellina E; Swoboda PP; Xue H; Greenwood JP; Moon JC; Kellman P; Plein S
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Jul; 20(1):48. PubMed ID: 29983119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consistent tracer administration profile improves test-retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow quantification with
Klein R; Ocneanu A; Renaud JM; Ziadi MC; Beanlands RSB; deKemp RA
J Nucl Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 25(3):929-941. PubMed ID: 27804067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated dynamic motion correction improves repeatability and reproducibility of myocardial blood flow quantification with rubidium-82 PET imaging.
Choueiry J; Mistry NP; Beanlands RSB; deKemp RA
J Nucl Cardiol; 2023 Jun; 30(3):1133-1146. PubMed ID: 36460862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimally Repeatable Kinetic Model Variant for Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements with
Ocneanu AF; deKemp RA; Renaud JM; Adler A; Beanlands RS; Klein R
Comput Math Methods Med; 2017; 2017():6810626. PubMed ID: 28293274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and Reproducibility of Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification by Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging in Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.
de Souza ACDAH; Harms HJ; Martell L; Bibbo C; Harrington M; Sullivan K; Hainer J; Dorbala S; Blankstein R; Taqueti VR; Foley Kijewski M; Park MA; Meretta A; Breault C; Roth N; Poitrasson-Rivière A; Soman P; Gullberg GT; Di Carli MF
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Jun; 15(6):e013987. PubMed ID: 35674051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Internal validation of myocardial flow reserve PET imaging using stress/rest myocardial activity ratios with Rb-82 and N-13-ammonia.
Juneau D; Wu KY; Kaps N; Yao J; Renaud JM; Beanlands RSB; Ruddy TD; deKemp RA
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Jun; 28(3):835-850. PubMed ID: 33389638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Myocardial perfusion quantification with Rb-82 PET: good interobserver agreement of Carimas software on global, regional, and segmental levels.
Nesterov SV; Deshayes E; Juarez-Orozco LE; deKemp RA; Sciagrà R; Malaspina S; Settimo L; Han C; Ryzhkova DV; Kostina IS; Gwet KL; Prior JO; Knuuti JM
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Jun; 36(6):507-514. PubMed ID: 35192160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impaired myocardial perfusion is associated with increasing end-systolic- and end-diastolic volumes in patients with non-ischemic systolic heart failure: a cross-sectional study using Rubidium-82 PET/CT.
Byrne C; Hasbak P; Kjaer A; Thune JJ; Køber L
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2019 Mar; 19(1):68. PubMed ID: 30902043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Blood pool and tissue phase patient motion effects on
Lee BC; Moody JB; Poitrasson-Rivière A; Melvin AC; Weinberg RL; Corbett JR; Ficaro EP; Murthy VL
J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1918-1929. PubMed ID: 29572594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantification of myocardial blood flow by CZT-SPECT with motion correction and comparison with
Otaki Y; Manabe O; Miller RJH; Manrique A; Nganoa C; Roth N; Berman DS; Germano G; Slomka PJ; Agostini D
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Aug; 28(4):1477-1486. PubMed ID: 31452085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
