These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32390573)

  • 1. Beyond Allyship: Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups.
    Radke HRM; Kutlaca M; Siem B; Wright SC; Becker JC
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2020 Nov; 24(4):291-315. PubMed ID: 32390573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is Martin Luther King or Malcolm X the more acceptable face of protest? High-status groups' reactions to low-status groups' collective action.
    Teixeira CP; Spears R; Yzerbyt VY
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 May; 118(5):919-944. PubMed ID: 31169387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing the Social Identity Model of Collective Action Longitudinally and Across Structurally Disadvantaged and Advantaged Groups.
    Thomas EF; Zubielevitch E; Sibley CG; Osborne D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Jun; 46(6):823-838. PubMed ID: 31610727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applying the Dynamic Dual Pathway Model of Approach Coping to Collective Action Among Advantaged Group Allies and Disadvantaged Group Members.
    Radke HRM; Kutlaca M; Becker JC
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():875848. PubMed ID: 35734462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disrupting the system constructively: Testing the effectiveness of nonnormative nonviolent collective action.
    Shuman E; Saguy T; van Zomeren M; Halperin E
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Oct; 121(4):819-841. PubMed ID: 32790473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. (Anti-)egalitarianism differentially predicts empathy for members of advantaged versus disadvantaged groups.
    Lucas BJ; Kteily NS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 May; 114(5):665-692. PubMed ID: 29672102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transforming "apathy into movement": the role of prosocial emotions in motivating action for social change.
    Thomas EF; McGarty C; Mavor KI
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2009 Nov; 13(4):310-33. PubMed ID: 19755664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What are they in it for? Marginalised group members' perceptions of allies differ depending on the costs and rewards associated with their allyship.
    Thai M; Nylund JL
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2024 Jan; 63(1):131-152. PubMed ID: 37534748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advantaged- and disadvantaged-group members have motivations similar to those of defenders and attackers, but their psychological characteristics are fundamentally different.
    Shnabel N; Becker J
    Behav Brain Sci; 2019 Aug; 42():e141. PubMed ID: 31407978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Political ideology shapes the amplification of the accomplishments of disadvantaged vs. advantaged group members.
    Kteily NS; Rocklage MD; McClanahan K; Ho AK
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Jan; 116(5):1559-1568. PubMed ID: 30642960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toward a comprehensive and potentially cross-cultural model of why people engage in collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of four motivations and structural constraints.
    Agostini M; van Zomeren M
    Psychol Bull; 2021 Jul; 147(7):667-700. PubMed ID: 34855427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The politics of allyship: Multiethnic coalitions and mass attitudes toward protest.
    Manekin D; Mitts T; Zeira Y
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 May; 121(19):e2314653121. PubMed ID: 38696470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intergroup Contact and Social Change: Implications of Negative and Positive Contact for Collective Action in Advantaged and Disadvantaged Groups.
    Reimer NK; Becker JC; Benz A; Christ O; Dhont K; Klocke U; Neji S; Rychlowska M; Schmid K; Hewstone M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Jan; 43(1):121-136. PubMed ID: 28903647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining our destiny: Do restrictions to collective autonomy fuel collective action?
    Kachanoff FJ; Kteily NS; Khullar TH; Park HJ; Taylor DM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Sep; 119(3):600-632. PubMed ID: 31566394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Whose tweets? The rhetorical functions of social media use in developing the Black Lives Matter movement.
    Wilkins DJ; Livingstone AG; Levine M
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2019 Oct; 58(4):786-805. PubMed ID: 30820992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Friend or ally: whether cross-group contact undermines collective action depends on what advantaged group members say (or don't say).
    Becker JC; Wright SC; Lubensky ME; Zhou S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Apr; 39(4):442-55. PubMed ID: 23504760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mobilizing or Sedative Effects? A Narrative Review of the Association Between Intergroup Contact and Collective Action Among Advantaged and Disadvantaged Groups.
    Cocco VM; Vezzali L; Stathi S; Di Bernardo GA; Dovidio JF
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2024 May; 28(2):119-180. PubMed ID: 37864514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Solidarity with whom? Minority perspectives on allyship in Danish queer spaces.
    Van Cong BT; Power SA; Morton TA
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38940568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Darker Side of Hope: Harmony-Focused Hope Decreases Collective Action Intentions Among the Disadvantaged.
    Hasan-Aslih S; Pliskin R; van Zomeren M; Halperin E; Saguy T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Feb; 45(2):209-223. PubMed ID: 29969946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of group status on children's hierarchy-reinforcing beliefs.
    Rizzo MT; Roberts SO; Rhodes M
    Dev Sci; 2023 Nov; 26(6):e13393. PubMed ID: 37056163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.