BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32390732)

  • 41. Center of pressure trajectory differences between shod and barefoot running.
    Becker J; Pisciotta E; James S; Osternig LR; Chou LS
    Gait Posture; 2014 Sep; 40(4):504-9. PubMed ID: 25012211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparison of the spatiotemporal parameters, kinematics, and biomechanics between shod, unshod, and minimally supported running as compared to walking.
    Lohman EB; Balan Sackiriyas KS; Swen RW
    Phys Ther Sport; 2011 Nov; 12(4):151-63. PubMed ID: 22085708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Metabolic cost of running barefoot versus shod: is lighter better?
    Franz JR; Wierzbinski CM; Kram R
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Aug; 44(8):1519-25. PubMed ID: 22367745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The biomechanical differences between barefoot and shod distance running: a systematic review and preliminary meta-analysis.
    Hall JP; Barton C; Jones PR; Morrissey D
    Sports Med; 2013 Dec; 43(12):1335-53. PubMed ID: 23996137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of minimalist and maximalist shoes on impact loading and footstrike pattern in habitual rearfoot strike trail runners: An in-field study.
    Mo S; Chan ZYS; Lai KKY; Chan PP; Wei RX; Yung PS; Shum G; Cheung RT
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2021 Feb; 21(2):183-191. PubMed ID: 32126931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparative biomechanical analysis of habitually unshod and shod runners based on a foot morphological difference.
    Mei Q; Fernandez J; Fu W; Feng N; Gu Y
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Aug; 42():38-53. PubMed ID: 25964998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Dynamic in-vivo assessment of navicular drop while running in barefoot, minimalist, and motion control footwear conditions.
    Hoffman SE; Peltz CD; Haladik JA; Divine G; Nurse MA; Bey MJ
    Gait Posture; 2015 Mar; 41(3):825-9. PubMed ID: 25791869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Interaction of arch type and footwear on running mechanics.
    Butler RJ; Davis IS; Hamill J
    Am J Sports Med; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1998-2005. PubMed ID: 16902231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Relationships among self-reported shoe type, footstrike pattern, and injury incidence.
    Goss DL; Gross MT
    US Army Med Dep J; 2012; ():25-30. PubMed ID: 23007933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of varying amounts of pronation on the mediolateral ground reaction forces during barefoot versus shod running.
    Morley JB; Decker LM; Dierks T; Blanke D; French JA; Stergiou N
    J Appl Biomech; 2010 May; 26(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 20498492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Manipulation of Foot Strike and Footwear Increases Achilles Tendon Loading During Running.
    Rice H; Patel M
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Aug; 45(10):2411-2417. PubMed ID: 28460179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners.
    Lieberman DE; Venkadesan M; Werbel WA; Daoud AI; D'Andrea S; Davis IS; Mang'eni RO; Pitsiladis Y
    Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7280):531-5. PubMed ID: 20111000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Acute fatigue negatively affects risk factors for injury in trained but not well-trained habitually shod runners when running barefoot.
    Tam N; Coetzee DR; Ahmed S; Lamberts RP; Albertus-Kajee Y; Tucker R
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Oct; 17(9):1220-1229. PubMed ID: 28820647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Well-trained Endurance Runners' Foot Contact Patterns: Barefoot vs. Shod Condition.
    Mosqueira-Ouréns M; Muñoz-Pérez I; Luis Tuimil J; Saleta-Cobos M; Varela-Sanz A
    Int J Sports Med; 2023 Dec; 44(14):1067-1074. PubMed ID: 37739011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The feasibility of a modified shoe for multi-segment foot motion analysis: a preliminary study.
    Halstead J; Keenan AM; Chapman GJ; Redmond AC
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2016; 9():7. PubMed ID: 26913080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Isolated effects of footwear structure and cushioning on running mechanics in habitual mid/forefoot runners.
    Gruber AH; Warne JP; Hamill J
    Sports Biomech; 2023 Mar; 22(3):422-441. PubMed ID: 36200613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners.
    Squadrone R; Gallozzi C
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2009 Mar; 49(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 19188889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Superficial plantar cutaneous sensation does not trigger barefoot running adaptations.
    Thompson MA; Hoffman KM
    Gait Posture; 2017 Sep; 57():305-309. PubMed ID: 28728130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of footwear on treadmill running biomechanics in preadolescent children.
    Hollander K; Riebe D; Campe S; Braumann KM; Zech A
    Gait Posture; 2014 Jul; 40(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 24890307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The effect of changing mediolateral center of pressure on rearfoot eversion during treadmill running.
    Mousavi SH; van Kouwenhove L; Rajabi R; Zwerver J; Hijmans JM
    Gait Posture; 2021 Jan; 83():201-209. PubMed ID: 33171373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.