These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32392233)

  • 1. SimSurvey: An R package for comparing the design and analysis of surveys by simulating spatially-correlated populations.
    Regular PM; Robertson GJ; Lewis KP; Babyn J; Healey B; Mowbray F
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0232822. PubMed ID: 32392233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variance estimation for systematic designs in spatial surveys.
    Fewster RM
    Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1518-31. PubMed ID: 21534940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simulation framework for evaluating multi-stage sampling designs in populations with spatially structured traits.
    Puerta P; Ciannelli L; Johnson B
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e6471. PubMed ID: 30828489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatially balanced sampling designs for environmental surveys.
    Kermorvant C; D'Amico F; Bru N; Caill-Milly N; Robertson B
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jul; 191(8):524. PubMed ID: 31363924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Precision of systematic and random sampling in clustered populations: habitat patches and aggregating organisms.
    McGarvey R; Burch P; Matthews JM
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Jan; 26(1):233-48. PubMed ID: 27039522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BAS: balanced acceptance sampling of natural resources.
    Robertson BL; Brown JA; McDonald T; Jaksons P
    Biometrics; 2013 Sep; 69(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 23844595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A spatially balanced design with probability function proportional to the within sample distance.
    Benedetti R; Piersimoni F
    Biom J; 2017 Sep; 59(5):1067-1084. PubMed ID: 28508431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the encounter rate variance in distance sampling.
    Fewster RM; Buckland ST; Burnham KP; Borchers DL; Jupp PE; Laake JL; Thomas L
    Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):225-36. PubMed ID: 18363772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling unobserved sources of heterogeneity in animal abundance using a Dirichlet process prior.
    Dorazio RM; Mukherjee B; Zhang L; Ghosh M; Jelks HL; Jordan F
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):635-44. PubMed ID: 17680831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Bayesian model for estimating population means using a link-tracing sampling design.
    St Clair K; O'Connell D
    Biometrics; 2012 Mar; 68(1):165-73. PubMed ID: 21668905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sampling strategies for species with high breeding-site fidelity: A case study in burrow-nesting seabirds.
    Arneill GE; Perrins CM; Wood MJ; Murphy D; Pisani L; Jessopp MJ; Quinn JL
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221625. PubMed ID: 31454375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practical Bias Correction in Aerial Surveys of Large Mammals: Validation of Hybrid Double-Observer with Sightability Method against Known Abundance of Feral Horse (Equus caballus) Populations.
    Lubow BC; Ransom JI
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154902. PubMed ID: 27139732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating trend precision and power to detect trends across grouped count data.
    Gray BR; Burlew MM
    Ecology; 2007 Sep; 88(9):2364-72. PubMed ID: 17918413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A model-based approach for making ecological inference from distance sampling data.
    Johnson DS; Laake JL; Ver Hoef JM
    Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):310-8. PubMed ID: 19459840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sampling of subpopulations in two-stage surveys.
    Clark RG
    Stat Med; 2009 Dec; 28(29):3697-717. PubMed ID: 19739232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatially explicit approach to estimation of total population abundance in field surveys.
    Takashina N; Kusumoto B; Beger M; Rathnayake S; Possingham HP
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Sep; 453():88-95. PubMed ID: 29787747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A two-step semiparametric method to accommodate sampling weights in multiple imputation.
    Zhou H; Elliott MR; Raghunathan TE
    Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):242-52. PubMed ID: 26393409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating the size of populations at high risk for HIV using respondent-driven sampling data.
    Handcock MS; Gile KJ; Mar CM
    Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):258-266. PubMed ID: 25585794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving inference for aerial surveys of bears: The importance of assumptions and the cost of unnecessary complexity.
    Schmidt JH; Wilson TL; Thompson WL; Reynolds JH
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Jul; 7(13):4812-4821. PubMed ID: 28690810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A latent process regression model for spatially correlated count data.
    McShane LM; Albert PS; Palmatier MA
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):698-706. PubMed ID: 9192458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.