These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32392453)

  • 21. The best of two worlds? Pulmonary vein isolation using a novel radiofrequency ablation catheter incorporating contact force sensing technology and 56-hole porous tip irrigation.
    Maurer T; Rottner L; Makimoto H; Reissmann B; Heeger CH; Lemes C; Fink T; Riedl J; Santoro F; Wohlmuth P; Volkmer M; Mathew S; Metzner A; Ouyang F; Kuck KH; Sohns C
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 107(11):1003-1012. PubMed ID: 29740700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors affecting catheter contact in the human left atrium and their impact on ablation efficacy.
    Ullah W; Hunter RJ; Baker V; Dhinoja MB; Sporton S; Earley MJ; Schilling RJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 25213917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Safety and long-term effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation with a contact force-sensing catheter: real-world experience from a prospective, multicentre observational cohort registry.
    De Potter T; Van Herendael H; Balasubramaniam R; Wright M; Agarwal SC; Sanders P; Khaykin Y; Latcu DG; Maury P; Pani A; Hayes J; Kalman J; Nery P; Duncan E
    Europace; 2018 Nov; 20(FI_3):f410-f418. PubMed ID: 29315382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Global multielectrode contact-mapping plus ablation with a single catheter in patients with atrial fibrillation: Global AF study.
    Kottkamp H; Hindricks G; Pönisch C; Bertagnolli L; Moser F; Hilbert S; Rieger A; Sommer P
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Nov; 30(11):2248-2255. PubMed ID: 31512340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Electrical modification suggesting transmurality is faster achieved with remote magnetic catheter in comparison with contact force use.
    Bun SS; Ayari A; Latcu DG; Errahmouni A; Saoudi N
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Jul; 28(7):745-753. PubMed ID: 28419605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of contact force sensing on the safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation: discrepancy between observational studies and randomized control trial data.
    Virk SA; Ariyaratnam J; Bennett RG; Kumar S
    Europace; 2019 Feb; 21(2):239-249. PubMed ID: 30544134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of surround flow catheter tip irrigation in contact force ablation on the incidence of asymptomatic oesophageal lesions after atrial fibrillation ablation: a prospective comparative study.
    Halbfass P; Nentwich K; Krug J; Roos M; Sonne K; Ene E; Hamm K; Barth S; Szöllösi A; Fochler F; Mügge A; Lüsebrink U; Deneke T
    Europace; 2017 Jul; 19(7):1116-1122. PubMed ID: 27353324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Safety and efficiency of porous-tip contact-force catheter for drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: results from the SMART SF trial.
    Chinitz LA; Melby DP; Marchlinski FE; Delaughter C; Fishel RS; Monir G; Patel AM; Gibson DN; Athill CA; Ming Boo L; Stagg R; Natale A
    Europace; 2018 Nov; 20(FI_3):f392-f400. PubMed ID: 29016769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Safety of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using fiber optic-based contact force sensing.
    Mansour M; Lakkireddy D; Packer D; Day JD; Mahapatra S; Brunner K; Reddy V; Natale A
    Heart Rhythm; 2017 Nov; 14(11):1631-1636. PubMed ID: 28734985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Role of contact force-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lin H; Chen YH; Hou JW; Lu ZY; Xiang Y; Li YG
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Sep; 28(9):994-1005. PubMed ID: 28569422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mechanisms of pulmonary vein reconnection after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: the deterministic role of contact force and interlesion distance.
    Park CI; Lehrmann H; Keyl C; Weber R; Schiebeling J; Allgeier J; Schurr P; Shah A; Neumann FJ; Arentz T; Jadidi AS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Jul; 25(7):701-8. PubMed ID: 24575734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation using a new three-dimensional non-fluoroscopic navigation system: a single-centre prospective study.
    Da Costa A; Ben H'dech M; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Bisch L; Gate-Martinet A; Levallois M; Isaaz K
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2013; 106(8-9):423-32. PubMed ID: 23906679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Porous tip contact force-sensing catheters for pulmonary vein isolation: performance in a clinical routine setting.
    Plenge T; van den Bruck JH; Lüker J; Sultan A; Steven D
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2020 Mar; 57(2):251-259. PubMed ID: 31321659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Target indices for clinical ablation in atrial fibrillation: insights from contact force, electrogram, and biophysical parameter analysis.
    Ullah W; Hunter RJ; Baker V; Dhinoja MB; Sporton S; Earley MJ; Schilling RJ
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Feb; 7(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 24443504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Our approach to maximizing the durability of pulmonary vein isolation during a paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation procedure.
    Reichlin T; Michaud GF
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1272-6. PubMed ID: 22913515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimizing radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation by direct catheter force measurement-a case-matched comparison in 198 patients.
    Sigmund E; Puererfellner H; Derndorfer M; Kollias G; Winter S; Aichinger J; Nesser HJ; Martinek M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Feb; 38(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 25469738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contact force sensors in minimally invasive catheters: current and future applications.
    Cheng W; Yao M; Zhai B; Wang P
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2021 May; 18(5):445-455. PubMed ID: 33886427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analysis of catheter contact force during atrial fibrillation ablation using the robotic navigation system: results from a randomized study.
    Dello Russo A; Fassini G; Conti S; Casella M; Di Monaco A; Russo E; Riva S; Moltrasio M; Tundo F; De Martino G; Gallinghouse GJ; Di Biase L; Natale A; Tondo C
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2016 Aug; 46(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 26798037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does the extent of left atrial arrhythmogenic substrate depend on the electroanatomical mapping technique: impact of pulmonary vein mapping catheter vs. ablation catheter.
    Huemer M; Qaiyumi D; Attanasio P; Parwani A; Pieske B; Blaschke F; Boldt LH; Haverkamp W; Wutzler A
    Europace; 2017 Aug; 19(8):1293-1301. PubMed ID: 27738066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preliminary experience with high-density electroanatomical mapping for ablation of atrial fibrillation - Comparison of mini-basket and novel open irrigated magnetic ablation catheter in consecutive patients.
    Kosiuk J; Hilbert S; John S; Bertagnolli L; Hindricks G; Bollmann A
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Feb; 228():401-405. PubMed ID: 27870969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.