These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32392999)
1. [Hybrid coronary revascularization for the treatment of coronary artery disease]. Shi DM; Han HY Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 May; 58(5):341-344. PubMed ID: 32392999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery with bilateral or single internal mammary artery grafts. Rosenblum JM; Harskamp RE; Hoedemaker N; Walker P; Liberman HA; de Winter RJ; Vassiliades TA; Puskas JD; Halkos ME J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Apr; 151(4):1081-9. PubMed ID: 26687889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hybrid Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Review and Current Evidence. Kiaii B; Teefy P Innovations (Phila); 2019 Oct; 14(5):394-404. PubMed ID: 31500492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization - Current State of the Art. Leyvi G; Dabas A; Leff JD J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2019 Dec; 33(12):3437-3445. PubMed ID: 31570244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and angiographic results after hybrid coronary revascularization. Halkos ME; Walker PF; Vassiliades TA; Douglas JS; Devireddy C; Guyton RA; Finn AV; Rab ST; Puskas JD; Liberman HA Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Feb; 97(2):484-90. PubMed ID: 24140212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Practical Approach to Hybrid Coronary Revascularization. Singh T; Ayinapudi K; Motwani A; Hendel R; Le Jemtel TH Cardiol Rev; 2020; 28(5):240-243. PubMed ID: 31985524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Zhu P; Zhou P; Sun Y; Guo Y; Mai M; Zheng S J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 May; 10():63. PubMed ID: 25928276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of outcomes of two minimally invasive approaches for multi-vessel coronary revascularization]. Zhang LF; Ling YP; Yang H; Gong YC; Song ZM; Wan F Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Dec; 49(6):1066-1070. PubMed ID: 29263483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization for the Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Multicenter Observational Study. Puskas JD; Halkos ME; DeRose JJ; Bagiella E; Miller MA; Overbey J; Bonatti J; Srinivas VS; Vesely M; Sutter F; Lynch J; Kirkwood K; Shapiro TA; Boudoulas KD; Crestanello J; Gehrig T; Smith P; Ragosta M; Hoff SJ; Zhao D; Gelijns AC; Szeto WY; Weisz G; Argenziano M; Vassiliades T; Liberman H; Matthai W; Ascheim DD J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Jul; 68(4):356-65. PubMed ID: 27443431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Comparative Effectiveness Analysis With Long-Term Follow-up. Hage A; Giambruno V; Jones P; Chu MW; Fox S; Teefy P; Lavi S; Bainbridge D; Harle C; Iglesias I; Dobkowski W; Kiaii B J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Dec; 8(24):e014204. PubMed ID: 31826727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Short-term follow-up results of hybrid coronary revascularization by robotic coronary artery bypass grafting and stent implantation]. Yang M; Gao C; Liu S; Wu Y; Xiao C; Wang R Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2015 Aug; 35(8):1166-9. PubMed ID: 26277515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: Early Outcomes and Midterm Follow-Up in Patients Undergoing Single or Multivessel Robotic TECAB and PCI. Nisivaco SM; Kitahara H; Abutaleb AR; Nathan S; Balkhy HH Innovations (Phila); 2022; 17(6):513-520. PubMed ID: 36529976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What is the state of hybrid coronary revascularization in 2018? Yanagawa B; Hong K; Cheema A; Bagai A; Verma S Curr Opin Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 33(5):540-545. PubMed ID: 29994806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients≥65 years with multivessel coronary artery disease. Harskamp RE; Puskas JD; Tijssen JG; Walker PF; Liberman HA; Lopes RD; Vassiliades TA; Peterson ED; Halkos ME Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jul; 114(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 24878119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hybrid revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease. Gąsior M; Zembala MO; Tajstra M; Filipiak K; Gierlotka M; Hrapkowicz T; Hawranek M; Poloński L; Zembala M; JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Nov; 7(11):1277-83. PubMed ID: 25459040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. One-stop hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease: 3-year follow-up results from a single institution. Shen L; Hu S; Wang H; Xiong H; Zheng Z; Li L; Xu B; Yan H; Gao R J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Jun; 61(25):2525-33. PubMed ID: 23623906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Utilization and Comparative Outcomes. Hannan EL; Wu Y; Cozzens K; Sundt TM; Girardi L; Chikwe J; Wechsler A; Smith CR; Gold JP; Lahey SJ; Jordan D Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Oct; 13(10):e009386. PubMed ID: 33040581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally Invasive CABG or Hybrid Coronary Revascularization for Multivessel Coronary Diseases: Which Is Best? A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. Guan Z; Zhang Z; Gu K; Wang H; Lin J; Zhou W; Wan F Heart Surg Forum; 2019 Dec; 22(6):E493-E502. PubMed ID: 31895036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]