These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32394498)

  • 1. One-stage individual participant data meta-analysis models for continuous and binary outcomes: Comparison of treatment coding options and estimation methods.
    Riley RD; Legha A; Jackson D; Morris TP; Ensor J; Snell KIE; White IR; Burke DL
    Stat Med; 2020 Aug; 39(19):2536-2555. PubMed ID: 32394498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual participant data meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: A comparison of approaches for specifying and estimating one-stage models.
    Legha A; Riley RD; Ensor J; Snell KIE; Morris TP; Burke DL
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(29):4404-4420. PubMed ID: 30101507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. One-stage random effects meta-analysis using linear mixed models for aggregate continuous outcome data.
    Papadimitropoulou K; Stijnen T; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Sep; 10(3):360-375. PubMed ID: 30523676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of analytic approaches for individual patient data meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Thomas D; Platt R; Benedetti A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):28. PubMed ID: 28202011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis of binary outcomes via generalized linear mixed models: a simulation study.
    Bakbergenuly I; Kulinskaya E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):70. PubMed ID: 29973146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of generalized linear mixed model procedures with estimating equations for variance and covariance parameter estimation in longitudinal studies and group randomized trials.
    Evans BA; Feng Z; Peterson AV
    Stat Med; 2001 Nov; 20(22):3353-73. PubMed ID: 11746323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of one-stage vs two-stage individual patient data meta-analysis methods: A simulation study.
    Kontopantelis E
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):417-430. PubMed ID: 29786975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating individualized treatment effects using an individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Bouvier F; Chaimani A; Peyrot E; Gueyffier F; Grenet G; Porcher R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):74. PubMed ID: 38528447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the performance of Bayesian and restricted maximum likelihood estimation for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters.
    Grantham KL; Kasza J; Heritier S; Carlin JB; Forbes AB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):112. PubMed ID: 35418034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical approaches to identify subgroups in meta-analysis of individual participant data: a simulation study.
    Belias M; Rovers MM; Reitsma JB; Debray TPA; IntHout J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Sep; 19(1):183. PubMed ID: 31477023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Random effects meta-analysis: Coverage performance of 95% confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation.
    Partlett C; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):301-317. PubMed ID: 27714841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of covariate effects in generalized linear mixed models with a misspecified distribution of random intercepts and slopes.
    Neuhaus JM; McCulloch CE; Boylan R
    Stat Med; 2013 Jun; 32(14):2419-29. PubMed ID: 23203817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects.
    Riley RD; Ensor J; Hattle M; Papadimitropoulou K; Morris TP
    Res Synth Methods; 2023 Nov; 14(6):903-910. PubMed ID: 37606180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data.
    Ju K; Lin L; Chu H; Cheng LL; Xu C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32539721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of one-stage meta-analytic method based on individual participant data for binary adverse events under the rule of three: a simulation study.
    Cheng LL; Ju K; Cai RL; Xu C
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e6295. PubMed ID: 30697486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One-stage individual participant data meta-analysis models: estimation of treatment-covariate interactions must avoid ecological bias by separating out within-trial and across-trial information.
    Hua H; Burke DL; Crowther MJ; Ensor J; Tudur Smith C; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(5):772-789. PubMed ID: 27910122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ.
    Burke DL; Ensor J; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(5):855-875. PubMed ID: 27747915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulation-based power calculations for planning a two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Ensor J; Burke DL; Snell KIE; Hemming K; Riley RD
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):41. PubMed ID: 29776399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual participant data meta-analysis with mixed-effects transformation models.
    Tamási B; Crowther M; Puhan MA; Steyerberg EW; Hothorn T
    Biostatistics; 2022 Oct; 23(4):1083-1098. PubMed ID: 34969073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.