These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Graphical model checking with correlated response data. Pan W; Connett JE; Porzio GC; Weisberg S Stat Med; 2001 Oct; 20(19):2935-49. PubMed ID: 11568950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How to think about shared norms and pluralism without circularity: A reply to Anna Leuschner. Eigi J Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2019 Jun; 75():51-56. PubMed ID: 31426947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments. Goldstone RL; Medin DL; Gentner D Cogn Psychol; 1991 Apr; 23(2):222-62. PubMed ID: 2055001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions. Treisman A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):652-76. PubMed ID: 1834783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional protein shape similarity analysis based on hybrid features. Li Z; Yu J; Hu H; Ji S Gene; 2018 Jul; 663():138-147. PubMed ID: 29684483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vital brains: On the entanglement of media, minds, and models. Borck C Prog Brain Res; 2017; 233():1-24. PubMed ID: 28826508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neural Architecture for Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory. Schneegans S; Bays PM J Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 37(14):3913-3925. PubMed ID: 28270569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics]. Pavlinov IIa Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Job share a consultant post. Thornicroft G; Strathdee G BMJ; 1992 Dec; 305(6866):1413-5. PubMed ID: 1486308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Descent with modification: the unity underlying homology and homoplasy as seen through an analysis of development and evolution. Hall BK Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2003 Aug; 78(3):409-33. PubMed ID: 14558591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What concept analysis in philosophy of science should be (and why competing philosophical analyses of gene concepts cannot be tested by polling scientists). Waters CK Hist Philos Life Sci; 2004; 26(1):29-58. PubMed ID: 15791805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Common and distinctive features in stimulus similarity: a modified version of the contrast model. Navarro DJ; Lee MD Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Dec; 11(6):961-74. PubMed ID: 15875967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Epistemic companions: shared reality development in close relationships. Rossignac-Milon M; Higgins ET Curr Opin Psychol; 2018 Oct; 23():66-71. PubMed ID: 29360060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Annotation-based feature extraction from sets of SBML models. Alm R; Waltemath D; Wolfien M; Wolkenhauer O; Henkel R J Biomed Semantics; 2015; 6():20. PubMed ID: 25904997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contributing to the debate on categorising shared sanitation facilities as 'unimproved': An account based on field researchers' observations and householders' opinions in three regions, Tanzania. Massa K; Kilamile F; Safari E; Seleman A; Mwakitalima A; Balengayabo JG; Kassile T; Mangesho PE; Mubyazi GM PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0185875. PubMed ID: 29107947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recognizing distinctive faces: a hybrid-similarity exemplar model account. Knapp BR; Nosofsky RM; Busey TA Mem Cognit; 2006 Jun; 34(4):877-89. PubMed ID: 17063918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]