These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

631 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32395750)

  • 1. To trigger or not to trigger ovulation in a natural cycle for frozen embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mackens S; Stubbe A; Santos-Ribeiro S; Van Landuyt L; Racca A; Roelens C; Camus M; De Vos M; van de Vijver A; Tournaye H; Blockeel C
    Hum Reprod; 2020 May; 35(5):1073-1081. PubMed ID: 32395750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer in a natural or mildly hormonally stimulated cycle in women with regular ovulatory cycles: a RCT.
    Peeraer K; Couck I; Debrock S; De Neubourg D; De Loecker P; Tomassetti C; Laenen A; Welkenhuysen M; Meeuwis L; Pelckmans S; Meuleman C; D'Hooghe T
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2552-62. PubMed ID: 26364081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frozen-thawed embryo transfers in natural cycles with spontaneous or induced ovulation: the search for the best protocol continues.
    Montagut M; Santos-Ribeiro S; De Vos M; Polyzos NP; Drakopoulos P; Mackens S; van de Vijver A; van Landuyt L; Verheyen G; Tournaye H; Blockeel C
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2803-2810. PubMed ID: 27798046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Home- or hospital-based monitoring to time frozen embryo transfer in the natural cycle? Patient-reported outcomes and experiences from the Antarctica-2 randomised controlled trial.
    Zaat TR; de Bruin JP; Goddijn M; Visser J; Kaaijk EM; Lambalk CB; Groenewoud ER; van Wely M; Mol F
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):866-875. PubMed ID: 32318722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is there an optimal window of time for transferring single frozen-thawed euploid blastocysts? A cohort study of 1170 embryo transfers.
    An BGL; Chapman M; Tilia L; Venetis C
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Nov; 37(12):2797-2807. PubMed ID: 36305795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Length of estradiol exposure >100 pg/ml in the follicular phase affects pregnancy outcomes in natural frozen embryo transfer cycles.
    Romanski PA; Bortoletto P; Liu YL; Chung PH; Rosenwaks Z
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Jun; 36(7):1932-1940. PubMed ID: 34128044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Natural proliferative phase frozen embryo transfer-a new approach which may facilitate scheduling without hindering pregnancy outcomes.
    Mendes Godinho C; Soares SR; Nunes SG; Martínez JMM; Santos-Ribeiro S
    Hum Reprod; 2024 May; 39(5):1089-1097. PubMed ID: 38531673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of endometrial preparation on early pregnancy loss and live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer: a large multicenter cohort study (14 421 frozen cycles).
    Vinsonneau L; Labrosse J; Porcu-Buisson G; Chevalier N; Galey J; Ahdad N; Ayel JP; Rongières C; Bouet PE; Mathieu d'Argent E; Cédrin-Durnerin I; Pessione F; Massin N
    Hum Reprod Open; 2022; 2022(2):hoac007. PubMed ID: 35274060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. There is no evidence that the time from egg retrieval to embryo transfer affects live birth rates in a freeze-all strategy.
    Lattes K; Checa MA; Vassena R; Brassesco M; Vernaeve V
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):368-374. PubMed ID: 27986819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What is the optimal duration of progesterone administration before transferring a vitrified-warmed cleavage stage embryo? A randomized controlled trial.
    van de Vijver A; Polyzos NP; Van Landuyt L; Mackens S; Stoop D; Camus M; De Vos M; Tournaye H; Blockeel C
    Hum Reprod; 2016 May; 31(5):1097-104. PubMed ID: 27005893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial of modified natural versus artificial cycle for cryo-thawed embryo transfer.
    Groenewoud ER; Cohlen BJ; Al-Oraiby A; Brinkhuis EA; Broekmans FJ; de Bruin JP; van den Dool G; Fleisher K; Friederich J; Goddijn M; Hoek A; Hoozemans DA; Kaaijk EM; Koks CA; Laven JS; van der Linden PJ; Manger AP; Slappendel E; Spinder T; Kollen BJ; Macklon NS
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1483-92. PubMed ID: 27179265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
    Ghobara T; Gelbaya TA; Ayeleke RO
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 7(7):CD003414. PubMed ID: 28675921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The freeze-all strategy versus agonist triggering with low-dose hCG for luteal phase support in IVF/ICSI for high responders: a randomized controlled trial.
    Santos-Ribeiro S; Mackens S; Popovic-Todorovic B; Racca A; Polyzos NP; Van Landuyt L; Drakopoulos P; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Blockeel C
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Dec; 35(12):2808-2818. PubMed ID: 32964939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is home-based monitoring of ovulation to time frozen embryo transfer a cost-effective alternative for hospital-based monitoring of ovulation? Study protocol of the multicentre, non-inferiority Antarctica-2 randomised controlled trial.
    Zaat TR; de Bruin JP; Goddijn M; van Baal M; Benneheij EB; Brandes EM; Broekmans F; Cantineau AEP; Cohlen B; van Disseldorp J; Gielen SCJP; Groenewoud ER; van Heusden A; Kaaijk EM; Koks C; de Koning CH; Klijn NF; Lambalk CB; van der Linden PJQ; Manger P; van Oppenraaij RHF; Pieterse Q; Smeenk J; Visser J; van Wely M; Mol F
    Hum Reprod Open; 2021; 2021(4):hoab035. PubMed ID: 35692982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immediate versus delayed frozen embryo transfer in patients following a stimulated IVF cycle: a randomised controlled trial.
    Li H; Sun X; Yang J; Li L; Zhang W; Lu X; Chen J; Chen H; Yu M; Fu W; Peng X; Chen J; Ng EHY
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Jun; 36(7):1832-1840. PubMed ID: 33885131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individualised luteal phase support in artificially prepared frozen embryo transfer cycles based on serum progesterone levels: a prospective cohort study.
    Álvarez M; Gaggiotti-Marre S; Martínez F; Coll L; García S; González-Foruria I; Rodríguez I; Parriego M; Polyzos NP; Coroleu B
    Hum Reprod; 2021 May; 36(6):1552-1560. PubMed ID: 33686413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frozen embryo transfer: a review on the optimal endometrial preparation and timing.
    Mackens S; Santos-Ribeiro S; van de Vijver A; Racca A; Van Landuyt L; Tournaye H; Blockeel C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Nov; 32(11):2234-2242. PubMed ID: 29025055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are systemic progesterone levels in true natural cycle euploid frozen embryo transfers with luteal phase support predictive for ongoing pregnancy rates?
    Lawrenz B; Ata B; Kalafat E; Melado L; ElKhatib I; Del Gallego R; Fatemi H
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Jul; 38(7):1318-1324. PubMed ID: 37196321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The depot GnRH agonist protocol improves the live birth rate per fresh embryo transfer cycle, but not the cumulative live birth rate in normal responders: a randomized controlled trial and molecular mechanism study.
    Xu B; Geerts D; Hu S; Yue J; Li Z; Zhu G; Jin L
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1306-1318. PubMed ID: 32478400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.