These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32396636)

  • 1. Considering Genomic Scans for Selection as Coalescent Model Choice.
    Harris RB; Jensen JD
    Genome Biol Evol; 2020 Jun; 12(6):871-877. PubMed ID: 32396636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coalescence 2.0: a multiple branching of recent theoretical developments and their applications.
    Tellier A; Lemaire C
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Jun; 23(11):2637-52. PubMed ID: 24750385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inferring Demography and Selection in Organisms Characterized by Skewed Offspring Distributions.
    Sackman AM; Harris RB; Jensen JD
    Genetics; 2019 Mar; 211(3):1019-1028. PubMed ID: 30651284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating power to detect recurrent selective sweeps under increasingly realistic evolutionary null models.
    Soni V; Johri P; Jensen JD
    bioRxiv; 2023 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 37398347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting Positive Selection in Populations Using Genetic Data.
    Koropoulis A; Alachiotis N; Pavlidis P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2090():87-123. PubMed ID: 31975165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Landmarks in the history of selective sweeps.
    Panigrahi M; Rajawat D; Nayak SS; Ghildiyal K; Sharma A; Jain K; Lei C; Bhushan B; Mishra BP; Dutt T
    Anim Genet; 2023 Dec; 54(6):667-688. PubMed ID: 37710403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic scans for selective sweeps using SNP data.
    Nielsen R; Williamson S; Kim Y; Hubisz MJ; Clark AG; Bustamante C
    Genome Res; 2005 Nov; 15(11):1566-75. PubMed ID: 16251466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How reliable are empirical genomic scans for selective sweeps?
    Teshima KM; Coop G; Przeworski M
    Genome Res; 2006 Jun; 16(6):702-12. PubMed ID: 16687733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sweepstakes reproductive success via pervasive and recurrent selective sweeps.
    Árnason E; Koskela J; Halldórsdóttir K; Eldon B
    Elife; 2023 Feb; 12():. PubMed ID: 36806325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The classical hitchhiking model with continuous mutational pressure and purifying selection.
    Stephan W
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Nov; 11(22):15896-15904. PubMed ID: 34824798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating power to detect recurrent selective sweeps under increasingly realistic evolutionary null models.
    Soni V; Johri P; Jensen JD
    Evolution; 2023 Oct; 77(10):2113-2127. PubMed ID: 37395482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The pitfalls and virtues of population genetic summary statistics: Detecting selective sweeps in recent divergences.
    Schneider K; White TJ; Mitchell S; Adams CE; Reeve R; Elmer KR
    J Evol Biol; 2021 Jun; 34(6):893-909. PubMed ID: 33185292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Versatile Detection of Diverse Selective Sweeps with Flex-Sweep.
    Lauterbur ME; Munch K; Enard D
    Mol Biol Evol; 2023 Jun; 40(6):. PubMed ID: 37307561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximum SNP FST Outperforms Full-Window Statistics for Detecting Soft Sweeps in Local Adaptation.
    da Silva Ribeiro T; Galván JA; Pool JE
    Genome Biol Evol; 2022 Oct; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 36152314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Background Selection Does Not Mimic the Patterns of Genetic Diversity Produced by Selective Sweeps.
    Schrider DR
    Genetics; 2020 Oct; 216(2):499-519. PubMed ID: 32847814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The joint allele frequency spectrum of multiple populations: a coalescent theory approach.
    Chen H
    Theor Popul Biol; 2012 Mar; 81(2):179-95. PubMed ID: 22155588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exact coalescent for the Wright-Fisher model.
    Fu YX
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Jun; 69(4):385-94. PubMed ID: 16426654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patterns of neutral diversity under general models of selective sweeps.
    Coop G; Ralph P
    Genetics; 2012 Sep; 192(1):205-24. PubMed ID: 22714413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of hard and soft selective sweeps from Drosophila melanogaster population genomic data.
    Garud NR; Messer PW; Petrov DA
    PLoS Genet; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e1009373. PubMed ID: 33635910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detecting selection in population trees: the Lewontin and Krakauer test extended.
    Bonhomme M; Chevalet C; Servin B; Boitard S; Abdallah J; Blott S; Sancristobal M
    Genetics; 2010 Sep; 186(1):241-62. PubMed ID: 20855576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.