435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32397992)
1. Optimizing 16S rRNA gene profile analysis from low biomass nasopharyngeal and induced sputum specimens.
Claassen-Weitz S; Gardner-Lubbe S; Mwaikono KS; du Toit E; Zar HJ; Nicol MP
BMC Microbiol; 2020 May; 20(1):113. PubMed ID: 32397992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of DNA Sequencing and Analysis Methods on 16S rRNA Gene Bacterial Community Analysis of Dairy Products.
Xue Z; Kable ME; Marco ML
mSphere; 2018 Oct; 3(5):. PubMed ID: 30333179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Refinement of 16S rRNA gene analysis for low biomass biospecimens.
Villette R; Autaa G; Hind S; Holm JB; Moreno-Sabater A; Larsen M
Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10741. PubMed ID: 34031485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decontamination of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence datasets based on bacterial load assessment by qPCR.
Lazarevic V; Gaïa N; Girard M; Schrenzel J
BMC Microbiol; 2016 Apr; 16():73. PubMed ID: 27107811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studies.
Isokääntä H; Tomnikov N; Vanhatalo S; Munukka E; Huovinen P; Hakanen AJ; Kallonen T
Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0293223. PubMed ID: 38747618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies.
Brooks JP; Edwards DJ; Harwich MD; Rivera MC; Fettweis JM; Serrano MG; Reris RA; Sheth NU; Huang B; Girerd P; ; Strauss JF; Jefferson KK; Buck GA
BMC Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 15():66. PubMed ID: 25880246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ddPCR allows 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of very small DNA amounts from low-biomass samples.
Abellan-Schneyder I; Schusser AJ; Neuhaus K
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):349. PubMed ID: 34922460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Refined, Controlled 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Approach Reveals Limited Detection of Cerebrospinal Fluid Microbiota in Children with Bacterial Meningitis.
Pope CE; Whitlock KB; Hodor P; Limbrick DD; McDonald PJ; Hauptman J; Hoffman LR; Simon TD
Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Jun; 11(3):e0036123. PubMed ID: 37140368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved DNA Extraction and Amplification Strategy for 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon-Based Microbiome Studies.
Hong BY; Driscoll M; Gratalo D; Jarvie T; Weinstock GM
Int J Mol Sci; 2024 Mar; 25(5):. PubMed ID: 38474213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Critical Relevance of Stochastic Effects on Low-Bacterial-Biomass 16S rRNA Gene Analysis.
Erb-Downward JR; Falkowski NR; D'Souza JC; McCloskey LM; McDonald RA; Brown CA; Shedden K; Dickson RP; Freeman CM; Stringer KA; Foxman B; Huffnagle GB; Curtis JL; Adar SD
mBio; 2020 Jun; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 32518181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Managing Contamination and Diverse Bacterial Loads in 16S rRNA Deep Sequencing of Clinical Samples: Implications of the Law of Small Numbers.
Dyrhovden R; Rippin M; Øvrebø KK; Nygaard RM; Ulvestad E; Kommedal Ø
mBio; 2021 Jun; 12(3):e0059821. PubMed ID: 34101489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Technical challenges regarding the use of formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens for the detection of bacterial alterations in colorectal cancer.
Lam SY; Ioannou A; Konstanti P; Visseren T; Doukas M; Peppelenbosch MP; Belzer C; Fuhler GM
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):297. PubMed ID: 34715774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studies.
Drengenes C; Wiker HG; Kalananthan T; Nordeide E; Eagan TML; Nielsen R
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):187. PubMed ID: 31412780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for comprehensive assessment of 16S rRNA bacterial diversity in marine biofilms using high-throughput sequencing.
Corcoll N; Österlund T; Sinclair L; Eiler A; Kristiansson E; Backhaus T; Eriksson KM
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2017 Aug; 364(14):. PubMed ID: 28673033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of variation and the impact of biomass in targeted 16S rRNA gene sequencing studies.
Bender JM; Li F; Adisetiyo H; Lee D; Zabih S; Hung L; Wilkinson TA; Pannaraj PS; She RC; Bard JD; Tobin NH; Aldrovandi GM
Microbiome; 2018 Sep; 6(1):155. PubMed ID: 30201048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combining 16S rRNA gene variable regions enables high-resolution microbial community profiling.
Fuks G; Elgart M; Amir A; Zeisel A; Turnbaugh PJ; Soen Y; Shental N
Microbiome; 2018 Jan; 6(1):17. PubMed ID: 29373999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Different next generation sequencing platforms produce different microbial profiles and diversity in cystic fibrosis sputum.
Hahn A; Sanyal A; Perez GF; Colberg-Poley AM; Campos J; Rose MC; Pérez-Losada M
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():95-99. PubMed ID: 27609714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pipeline for amplifying and analyzing amplicons of the V1-V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene.
Allen HK; Bayles DO; Looft T; Trachsel J; Bass BE; Alt DP; Bearson SM; Nicholson T; Casey TA
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Aug; 9():380. PubMed ID: 27485508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Host DNA depletion efficiency of microbiome DNA enrichment methods in infected tissue samples.
Heravi FS; Zakrzewski M; Vickery K; Hu H
J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Mar; 170():105856. PubMed ID: 32007505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
