These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32398083)

  • 21. What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?
    Clement ND; Bardgett M; Weir D; Holland J; Gerrand C; Deehan DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 476(10):2005-2014. PubMed ID: 30179956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12.
    Gravbrot N; Kelly DF; Milligan J; Griffiths CF; Barkhoudarian G; Jahnke H; White WL; Little AS
    Neurosurgery; 2018 Aug; 83(2):277-280. PubMed ID: 28973679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation.
    Chen P; Lin KC; Liing RJ; Wu CY; Chen CL; Chang KC
    Qual Life Res; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1585-96. PubMed ID: 26714699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Minimum clinically important difference of the health-related quality of life scales in adult spinal deformity calculated by latent class analysis: is it appropriate to use the same values for surgical and nonsurgical patients?
    Yuksel S; Ayhan S; Nabiyev V; Domingo-Sabat M; Vila-Casademunt A; Obeid I; Perez-Grueso FS; Acaroglu E;
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 30010046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Wisconsin gait scale - The minimal clinically important difference.
    Guzik A; Drużbicki M; Wolan-Nieroda A; Przysada G; Kwolek A
    Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():453-457. PubMed ID: 30599331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Minimal Clinically Important Difference for PROMIS Physical Function in Patients With Distal Radius Fractures.
    Sandvall B; Okoroafor UC; Gerull W; Guattery J; Calfee RP
    J Hand Surg Am; 2019 Jun; 44(6):454-459.e1. PubMed ID: 30954311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF) for Fatigue Worsening in Asian Breast Cancer Patients.
    Chan A; Yo TE; Wang XJ; Ng T; Chae JW; Yeo HL; Shwe M; Gan YX
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2018 Mar; 55(3):992-997.e2. PubMed ID: 29097274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Establishing the minimal clinically important difference for the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders.
    Mattos JL; Schlosser RJ; Mace JC; Smith TL; Soler ZM
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2018 Sep; 8(9):1041-1046. PubMed ID: 29719139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Minimum clinically important differences in chronic pain vary considerably by baseline pain and methodological factors: systematic review of empirical studies.
    Olsen MF; Bjerre E; Hansen MD; Tendal B; Hilden J; Hróbjartsson A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 101():87-106.e2. PubMed ID: 29793007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical importance in Alzheimer's disease: effects of anchor agreement and disease severity.
    Stojanovic M; Mikula C; John S; Kiselica A
    Aging Clin Exp Res; 2024 Jan; 36(1):5. PubMed ID: 38265507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Establishing Minimal Clinically Important Differences for the Quality of Life Instrument in Patients With Breast Cancer QLICP-BR (V2.0) Based on Anchor-Based and Distribution-Based Methods.
    Li F; Liu Y; Wan C; Zhou J; Tan J; Chen H
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():753729. PubMed ID: 35586490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimal Clinically Important Differences for American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score in Hallux Valgus Surgery.
    Chan HY; Chen JY; Zainul-Abidin S; Ying H; Koo K; Rikhraj IS
    Foot Ankle Int; 2017 May; 38(5):551-557. PubMed ID: 28193121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tools to assess the measurement properties of quality of life instruments: a meta-review protocol.
    Lorente S; Vives J; Viladrich C; Losilla JM
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jul; 8(7):e022829. PubMed ID: 30037880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in the Timed Up and Go Test After Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.
    Gautschi OP; Stienen MN; Corniola MV; Joswig H; Schaller K; Hildebrandt G; Smoll NR
    Neurosurgery; 2017 Mar; 80(3):380-385. PubMed ID: 27352275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Changes in Quality of Life in Parkinson's Disease: How Large Must They Be to Be Relevant?
    Horváth K; Aschermann Z; Kovács M; Makkos A; Harmat M; Janszky J; Komoly S; Karádi K; Kovács N
    Neuroepidemiology; 2017; 48(1-2):1-8. PubMed ID: 28161701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.