166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32398565)
1. Magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: pros and cons.
Sterris JA; Dunn CP; Bildzukewicz NA; Lipham JC
Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 36(4):323-328. PubMed ID: 32398565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Fundoplication and Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for the Treatment of Medically Refractory GERD.
Richards WO; McRae C
Am Surg; 2018 Nov; 84(11):1762-1767. PubMed ID: 30747630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and pooled analysis.
Guidozzi N; Wiggins T; Ahmed AR; Hanna GB; Markar SR
Dis Esophagus; 2019 Nov; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 31069388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Favorable results from a prospective evaluation of 200 patients with large hiatal hernias undergoing LINX magnetic sphincter augmentation.
Buckley FP; Bell RCW; Freeman K; Doggett S; Heidrick R
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1762-1768. PubMed ID: 28936790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. LINX
Skubleny D; Switzer NJ; Dang J; Gill RS; Shi X; de Gara C; Birch DW; Wong C; Hutter MM; Karmali S
Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3078-3084. PubMed ID: 27981382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early results of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aiolfi A; Asti E; Bernardi D; Bonitta G; Rausa E; Siboni S; Bonavina L
Int J Surg; 2018 Apr; 52():82-88. PubMed ID: 29471155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Charges, outcomes, and complications: a comparison of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of GERD.
Reynolds JL; Zehetner J; Nieh A; Bildzukewicz N; Sandhu K; Katkhouda N; Lipham JC
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3225-30. PubMed ID: 26541730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multi-institutional outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Warren HF; Reynolds JL; Lipham JC; Zehetner J; Bildzukewicz NA; Taiganides PA; Mickley J; Aye RW; Farivar AS; Louie BE
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3289-96. PubMed ID: 26541740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative outcomes of Toupet fundoplication and magnetic sphincter augmentation.
Asti E; Milito P; Froiio C; Milani V; Bonavina L
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Jun; 36(Supplement_1):. PubMed ID: 36544397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of magnetic sphincter augmentation in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Bonavina L; Boyle N; Schoppmann SF
Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2021 Jul; 37(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 33883422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic sphincter augmentation: laparoscopic or robotic approach?
Maharsi S; Lipham JC; Houghton CC
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Jun; 36(Supplement_1):. PubMed ID: 36484296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Application of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease].
Li ZG
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 58(9):683-686. PubMed ID: 32878414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation vs Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 100 Patients.
Reynolds JL; Zehetner J; Wu P; Shah S; Bildzukewicz N; Lipham JC
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 26095560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-term outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for medically resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Louie BE; Farivar AS; Shultz D; Brennan C; Vallières E; Aye RW
Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Aug; 98(2):498-504; discussion 504-5. PubMed ID: 24961840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revaluation of the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Zhang H; Dong D; Liu Z; He S; Hu L; Lv Y
Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3684-90. PubMed ID: 26659236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-year clinical experience with magnetic sphincter augmentation and laparoscopic fundoplication.
Bonavina L; Horbach T; Schoppmann SF; DeMarchi J
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3449-3458. PubMed ID: 32676727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of clinical studies.
Asti E; Aiolfi A; Lazzari V; Sironi A; Porta M; Bonavina L
Updates Surg; 2018 Sep; 70(3):323-330. PubMed ID: 30022361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is systematic formal crural repair mandatory at the time of magnetic sphincter augmentation implantation?
Bell R
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Jun; 36(Supplement_1):. PubMed ID: 36617229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative trial of laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation and Nissen fundoplication.
Sheu EG; Nau P; Nath B; Kuo B; Rattner DW
Surg Endosc; 2015 Mar; 29(3):505-9. PubMed ID: 25012804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short term safety of magnetic sphincter augmentation vs minimally invasive fundoplication: an ACS-NSQIP analysis.
Wisniowski P; Putnam LR; Gallagher S; Rawal R; Houghton C; Lipham JC
Surg Endosc; 2024 Apr; 38(4):1944-1949. PubMed ID: 38334778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
