127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32400314)
1. Taking Choice Seriously in
Bagenstos SR
J Leg Med; 2020; 40(1):5-25. PubMed ID: 32400314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Realizing the Promise of
Schwartz SJ; Fleischner RD; Schwartz AZ; Stephens EM
J Leg Med; 2020; 40(1):63-100. PubMed ID: 32400309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Constitutional Right to Community Services:
Ferleger D
J Leg Med; 2020; 40(1):101-114. PubMed ID: 32400311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Judicial Threats to
Mangan JG; Dennis AL
Psychiatr Serv; 2024 Jun; 75(6):589-593. PubMed ID: 38088039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5.
Kershner S; Goico SW
J Leg Med; 2020; 40(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 32400312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Where We are on the Twentieth Anniversary of
Sloan L; Gulrajani C
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Dec; 47(4):408-413. PubMed ID: 31811081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Using the Courts to Shape Medicaid Policy: Olmstead v. L.C. by Zimring and Its Community Integration Legacy.
Rosenbaum S
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2016 Aug; 41(4):585-97. PubMed ID: 27127257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Olmstead decision and the journey toward integration:the evolution of social work responses.
Yong F
J Gerontol Soc Work; 2007; 49(1-2):115-26. PubMed ID: 17804363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reflecting on
Lombardo P; Bliss C; Caley S; Gottlieb S; Jamieson S; Roseborough TW; Webster D
J Leg Med; 2020; 40(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 32400308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Disabled physician denied license: Supreme Court to rule on whether doctor may sue under AwDA.
Sfikas PM
J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 134(3):370-1. PubMed ID: 12699053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. CRIPA, Olmstead, and the transformation of the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board.
Bloom JD
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 22960921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of the Olmstead decision five years later:a national perspective for social workers.
Zendell AL
J Gerontol Soc Work; 2007; 49(1-2):97-113. PubMed ID: 17804362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Baby Doe's new guardians: federal policy brings nontreatment decisions out of hiding.
Born MA
KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(3):659-75. PubMed ID: 11651897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Listening to the disabled: end-of-life medical decision making and the never competent.
Miller EC
Fordham Law Rev; 2006 Apr; 74(5):2889-925. PubMed ID: 17115482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Prohibition on assisting a suicide is interference with rights of severely disabled people, UK Supreme Court is told.
Dyer C
BMJ; 2013 Dec; 347():f7589. PubMed ID: 24352939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The application of the Olmstead decision on housing and eldercare.
Palley E; Rozario PA
J Gerontol Soc Work; 2007; 49(1-2):81-96. PubMed ID: 17804361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Socially-assisted dying and people with disabilities: some emerging legal, medical, and policy implications.
Blanck P; Kirschner K; Bienen L
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1997; 21(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 9287469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion and the law: the impact on hospital policy of the Roe and Doe decisions.
Kemp KA; Carp RA; Brady DW
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1976; 1(3):319-37. PubMed ID: 1022805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe.
Drinan RF
America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan.
Bennett SA
Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
