These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32402866)

  • 1. How do drivers negotiate intersections with pedestrians? The importance of pedestrian time-to-arrival and visibility.
    Dozza M; Boda CN; Jaber L; Thalya P; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jun; 141():105524. PubMed ID: 32402866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Brake reactions of distracted drivers to pedestrian Forward Collision Warning systems.
    Lubbe N
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():23-32. PubMed ID: 28454868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How do drivers overtake pedestrians? Evidence from field test and naturalistic driving data.
    Rasch A; Panero G; Boda CN; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 May; 139():105494. PubMed ID: 32203729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of safety measures on driver's speed behavior at pedestrian crossings.
    Bella F; Silvestri M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Oct; 83():111-24. PubMed ID: 26253423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modelling how drivers respond to a bicyclist crossing their path at an intersection: How do test track and driving simulator compare?
    Boda CN; Dozza M; Bohman K; Thalya P; Larsson A; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Feb; 111():238-250. PubMed ID: 29248617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pedestrian crossing situations: quantification of comfort boundaries to guide intervention timing.
    Lubbe N; Rosén E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Oct; 71():261-6. PubMed ID: 24956130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Drivers' speed behaviour at a zebra crossing: a case study.
    Várhelyi A
    Accid Anal Prev; 1998 Nov; 30(6):731-43. PubMed ID: 9805516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kinematic cues in driver-pedestrian communication to support safe road crossing.
    Zach Noonan T; Gershon P; Domeyer J; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107236. PubMed ID: 37531855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research of fatal car-to-pedestrian precrash scenarios for the testing of the active safety system in China.
    Tan Z; Che Y; Xiao L; Hu W; Li P; Xu J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105857. PubMed ID: 33285448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of Integrated Pedestrian Protection Systems with Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) and Passive Safety Components.
    Edwards M; Nathanson A; Carroll J; Wisch M; Zander O; Lubbe N
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S2-S11. PubMed ID: 26027971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
    Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interdependence of driver and pedestrian behavior in naturalistic roadway negotiations.
    Noonan TZ; Gershon P; Domeyer J; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S62-S67. PubMed ID: 36026485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of automated emergency braking system's avoidance of pedestrian crashes at intersections under occluded conditions within a virtual simulator.
    Abdel-Aty M; Cai Q; Wu Y; Zheng O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Oct; 176():106797. PubMed ID: 35964393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.
    Cicchino JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):142-152. PubMed ID: 27898367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Chen R; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S176-81. PubMed ID: 26436229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimated benefit of automated emergency braking systems for vehicle-pedestrian crashes in the United States.
    Haus SH; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S171-S176. PubMed ID: 31381447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the importance of driver models for the development and assessment of active safety: A new collision warning system to make overtaking cyclists safer.
    Kovaceva J; Bärgman J; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Feb; 165():106513. PubMed ID: 34936932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research on Longitudinal Active Collision Avoidance of Autonomous Emergency Braking Pedestrian System (AEB-P).
    Yang W; Zhang X; Lei Q; Cheng X
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Oct; 19(21):. PubMed ID: 31661814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.