159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32405024)
21. Shaking up science.
Couzin-Frankel J
Science; 2013 Jan; 339(6118):386-9. PubMed ID: 23349264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Set up a 'self-retraction' system for honest errors.
Fanelli D
Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7595):415. PubMed ID: 27008933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Retracted publications in the drug literature.
Samp JC; Schumock GT; Pickard AS
Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):586-95. PubMed ID: 22581659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Research: Uncovering misconduct.
Gewin V
Nature; 2012 May; 485(7396):137-9. PubMed ID: 22563582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Retractions due to errors and frauds].
Decullier E; Samson G; Huot L
Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):847-52. PubMed ID: 22841376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Retraction of Neurosurgical Publications: A Systematic Review.
Wang J; Ku JC; Alotaibi NM; Rutka JT
World Neurosurg; 2017 Jul; 103():809-814.e1. PubMed ID: 28412480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Analysis and Correction of Inappropriate Image Duplication: the
Bik EM; Fang FC; Kullas AL; Davis RJ; Casadevall A
Mol Cell Biol; 2018 Oct; 38(20):. PubMed ID: 30037982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analysis of retracted articles in the surgical literature.
King EG; Oransky I; Sachs TE; Farber A; Flynn DB; Abritis A; Kalish JA; Siracuse JJ
Am J Surg; 2018 Nov; 216(5):851-855. PubMed ID: 29229380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Publication ethics: its importance to readers, authors, and the profession.
Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C
J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs; 2012 Feb; 25(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22299799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Publication ethics: Its importance to readers, authors, and the profession.
Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2012 Jan; 24(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22243674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Signs of 'citation hacking' flagged in scientific papers.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2020 Aug; 584(7822):508. PubMed ID: 32796929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Special report: taking on the cheats.
Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):258-9. PubMed ID: 15902219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Publication ethics: its importance to readers, authors, and the profession.
Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C
Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2012 Jan; 48(1):1. PubMed ID: 22188040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud.
Farthing MJ
Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Committee on Publication Ethics. The COPE Report 1999. Guidelines on good publication practice.
Ann Trop Paediatr; 2000 Jun; 20(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 10945056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. How to Act When Research Misconduct Is Not Detected by Software but Revealed by the Author of the Plagiarized Article.
Baydik OD; Gasparyan AY
J Korean Med Sci; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1508-10. PubMed ID: 27550475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. 'Tortured phrases' give away fabricated research papers.
Else H
Nature; 2021 Aug; 596(7872):328-329. PubMed ID: 34354273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Guidelines on good publication practice: the committe on publication ethics (COPE) report 2003].
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
Pro Fono; 2005; 17(2):264-70. PubMed ID: 16909537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Scientific misconduct. Researcher faces prison for fraud in NIH grant applications and papers.
Kintisch E
Science; 2005 Mar; 307(5717):1851. PubMed ID: 15790813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Authorship in scholarly scientific publication.
Habal MB
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1059-60. PubMed ID: 23851737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
