143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32405912)
1. Characterization of fracture liaison service non-responders after invitation by home visits and questionnaires.
van den Berg P; van Haard PMM; Geusens PP; van den Bergh JP; Schweitzer DH
Osteoporos Int; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2007-2015. PubMed ID: 32405912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimizing fracture prevention: the fracture liaison service, an observational study.
Eekman DA; van Helden SH; Huisman AM; Verhaar HJ; Bultink IE; Geusens PP; Lips P; Lems WF
Osteoporos Int; 2014 Feb; 25(2):701-9. PubMed ID: 24030287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meeting international standards of secondary fracture prevention: a survey on Fracture Liaison Services in the Netherlands.
van den Berg P; Schweitzer DH; van Haard PM; van den Bergh JP; Geusens PP
Osteoporos Int; 2015 Sep; 26(9):2257-63. PubMed ID: 25860976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Poor Attendance for bone densitometry in patients at high risk of subsequent fragility fractures.
Sahota A; Desai H; Hershkovica O; Sahota O
J Clin Densitom; 2022; 25(3):380-383. PubMed ID: 34973896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implementing a fracture liaison service open model of care utilizing a cloud-based tool.
Greenspan SL; Singer A; Vujevich K; Marchand B; Thompson DA; Hsu YJ; Vaidya D; Stern LS; Zeldow D; Lee DB; Karp S; Recker R
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Apr; 29(4):953-960. PubMed ID: 29429033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of the Western Australian Osteoporosis Model of Care: a fracture liaison service utilising emergency department information systems to identify patients with fragility fracture to improve current practice and reduce re-fracture rates: a 12-month analysis.
Inderjeeth CA; Raymond WD; Briggs AM; Geelhoed E; Oldham D; Mountain D
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1759-1770. PubMed ID: 29704027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: evaluation of the Lille University Hospital's Fracture Liaison Service between January 2016 and January 2018.
Pflimlin A; Gournay A; Delabrière I; Chantelot C; Puisieux F; Cortet B; Paccou J
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1779-1788. PubMed ID: 31190123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Challenges and opportunities to improve fracture liaison service attendance: fracture registration and patient characteristics and motivations.
van den Berg P; van Haard PMM; Geusens PP; van den Bergh JP; Schweitzer DH
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1597-1606. PubMed ID: 31129686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preventing future fractures: effectiveness of an orthogeriatric fracture liaison service compared to an outpatient fracture liaison service and the standard management in patients with hip fracture.
Naranjo A; Fernández-Conde S; Ojeda S; Torres-Hernández L; Hernández-Carballo C; Bernardos I; Rodríguez S; Laynez P
Arch Osteoporos; 2017 Dec; 12(1):112. PubMed ID: 29230540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breaking the cycle of recurrent fracture: implementing the first fracture liaison service (FLS) in British Columbia, Canada.
Singh S; Whitehurst DG; Funnell L; Scott V; MacDonald V; Leung PM; Friesen K; Feldman F
Arch Osteoporos; 2019 Nov; 14(1):116. PubMed ID: 31776684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence of effectiveness of a fracture liaison service to reduce the re-fracture rate.
Nakayama A; Major G; Holliday E; Attia J; Bogduk N
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Mar; 27(3):873-879. PubMed ID: 26650377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rush Fracture Liaison Service for capturing "missed opportunities" to treat osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures.
Gupta MJ; Shah S; Peterson S; Baim S
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1861-1874. PubMed ID: 29869038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Persistence and compliance to osteoporosis therapy in a fracture liaison service: a prospective cohort study.
Senay A; Fernandes JC; Delisle J; Morin SN; Perreault S
Arch Osteoporos; 2019 Aug; 14(1):87. PubMed ID: 31375983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of a minimal resource fracture liaison service.
Axelsson KF; Jacobsson R; Lund D; Lorentzon M
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Nov; 27(11):3165-3175. PubMed ID: 27230521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of the Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) in subsequent fracture prevention in the extreme elderly.
Sanli I; van Helden SH; Ten Broeke RHM; Geusens P; Van den Bergh JPW; Brink PRG; Poeze M
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2019 Aug; 31(8):1105-1111. PubMed ID: 30311093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A New Fracture Liaison Service Using the Mobile Application and IoT Sensor.
Kim SW; Won YJ; Chae DS; Chang HJ
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():3486-3489. PubMed ID: 31946629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adherence to fracture liaison service programs in patients over 70: the hidden part of the iceberg.
Mugnier B; Daumas A; Doddoli S; Belmeliani S; Couderc AL; Mizzi B; Lévêque P; Villani P
Osteoporos Int; 2020 Apr; 31(4):765-774. PubMed ID: 31927612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture liaison services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Wu CH; Tu ST; Chang YF; Chan DC; Chien JT; Lin CH; Singh S; Dasari M; Chen JF; Tsai KS
Bone; 2018 Jun; 111():92-100. PubMed ID: 29555309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Societal costs before and up to 1 year after the first fracture liaison service visit in patients requiring anti-osteoporosis treatments.
Maas L; Boonen A; Wyers CE; Bours S; van den Bergh JP; Evers SM; van Kuijk SMJ; Hiligsmann M
Arch Osteoporos; 2024 May; 19(1):36. PubMed ID: 38740651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture liaison service and mortality in elderly hip fracture patients: a prospective cohort study.
González-Quevedo D; Bautista-Enrique D; Pérez-Del-Río V; Bravo-Bardají M; García-de-Quevedo D; Tamimi I
Osteoporos Int; 2020 Jan; 31(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 31511912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
