These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32405912)
41. What is a reasonable rate for specific osteoporosis drug therapy in older fragility fracture patients? Gosch M; Bail HJ; Grueninger S; Stumpf U; Kammerlander C; Wicklein S Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Feb; 15(1):20. PubMed ID: 32088765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Patients discharged from a fracture liaison service still require follow-up and bone health advice. Hui N; Fraser S; Wong PKK Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Jul; 15(1):118. PubMed ID: 32728971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Exploring barriers and opportunities to improve osteoporosis care across the acute-to-primary care interface: a qualitative study. Bennett MJ; Center JR; Perry L Osteoporos Int; 2023 Jul; 34(7):1249-1262. PubMed ID: 37093239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Fracture Liaison Service and Osteoporosis Liaison Service.]. Hagino H Clin Calcium; 2017; 27(9):1225-1231. PubMed ID: 28912384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Results of a fracture liaison service on hip fracture patients in an open healthcare system. Cosman F; Nicpon K; Nieves JW Aging Clin Exp Res; 2017 Apr; 29(2):331-334. PubMed ID: 26899962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Profile and 3-month evolution of geriatric patients after a hip fracture followed-up at a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS). Moral-Cuesta D; Gutiérrez-Misis A; Cedeno-Veloz BA; Matovelle-Ochoa P; Epelde IM; Alarcón TA; Díez-Sebastián J; Galbete A; Maestre IM; Velilla NM; González-Montalvo JI Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol; 2022; 57(4):205-211. PubMed ID: 35872030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Barriers to osteoporosis management and adherence to Clinical Practice Guideline: a comparative study between tertiary East Coast hospitals and a Fracture Liaison Services (FLS)-accredited hospital in Malaysia. Muhamad Jamil NK; Naina Mohamed I; Mokhtar SA; Leong JF; Kamudin NAF; Muhammad N Arch Osteoporos; 2024 Jun; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 38864939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Fracture liaison service: impact on subsequent nonvertebral fracture incidence and mortality. Huntjens KM; van Geel TA; van den Bergh JP; van Helden S; Willems P; Winkens B; Eisman JA; Geusens PP; Brink PR J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Feb; 96(4):e29. PubMed ID: 24553898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Experience gained from the implementation of the fracture liaison service in Greece. Makras P; Babis GC; Chronopoulos E; Karachalios T; Kazakos K; Paridis D; Potoupnis M; Tzavellas AN; Valkanis C; Kosmidis C Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Jan; 15(1):12. PubMed ID: 31897772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Patients 80 + have similar medication initiation rates to those aged 50-79 in Ontario FLS. Sale JEM; Yang A; Elliot-Gibson V; Jain R; Sujic R; Linton D; Weldon J; Frankel L; Bogoch E Osteoporos Int; 2021 Jul; 32(7):1405-1411. PubMed ID: 33471148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Prevention of osteoporotic refractures in regional Australia. Davidson E; Seal A; Doyle Z; Fielding K; McGirr J Aust J Rural Health; 2017 Dec; 25(6):362-368. PubMed ID: 28618161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Rates of osteoporosis screening and treatment following vertebral fracture. Barton DW; Behrend CJ; Carmouche JJ Spine J; 2019 Mar; 19(3):411-417. PubMed ID: 30142455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Capture the Fracture: a Best Practice Framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. Akesson K; Marsh D; Mitchell PJ; McLellan AR; Stenmark J; Pierroz DD; Kyer C; Cooper C; Osteoporos Int; 2013 Aug; 24(8):2135-52. PubMed ID: 23589162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [FLS - three letters alter secondary fracture prevention]. Suhm N; Meier C; Kraenzlin M; Kungler E; Savic B; Mueller S; Jakob M; Rikli D Unfallchirurg; 2016 Jan; 119(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 26676632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Persistence with osteoporosis treatment in patients from the Lille University Hospital Fracture Liaison Service. Delbar A; Pflimlin A; Delabrière I; Ternynck C; Chantelot C; Puisieux F; Cortet B; Paccou J Bone; 2021 Mar; 144():115838. PubMed ID: 33385615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Patients undergoing surgical treatment for low-energy distal radius fractures are more likely to receive a referral and participate in a fracture liaison service program. Vaughn N; Akelman M; Marenghi N; Lake AF; Graves BR Arch Osteoporos; 2022 Jul; 17(1):96. PubMed ID: 35854058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Implementation of an in-patient hip fracture liaison services to improve initiation of osteoporosis medication use within 1-year of hip fracture: a population-based time series analysis using the RE-AIM framework. Beaupre LA; Moradi F; Khong H; Smith C; Evens L; Hanson HM; Juby AG; Kivi P; Majumdar SR; Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Jun; 15(1):83. PubMed ID: 32488730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cost-effectiveness of a fracture liaison service--a real-world evaluation after 6 years of service provision. Yong JH; Masucci L; Hoch JS; Sujic R; Beaton D Osteoporos Int; 2016 Jan; 27(1):231-40. PubMed ID: 26275439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Value of a coordinated management of osteoporosis via Fracture Liaison Service for the treatment of orthogeriatric patients. Schray D; Neuerburg C; Stein J; Gosch M; Schieker M; Böcker W; Kammerlander C Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2016 Oct; 42(5):559-564. PubMed ID: 27458065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]