These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32406263)
1. Comparison of Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Traditional Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large Cohort. Patel TM; Shah SC; Soni YY; Radadiya RC; Patel GA; Tiwari PO; Pancholy SB Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 May; 13(5):e008888. PubMed ID: 32406263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center. Kagiyama K; Mitsutake Y; Ueno T; Sakai S; Nakamura T; Yamaji K; Ishimatsu T; Sasaki M; Chibana H; Itaya N; Sasaki KI; Fukumoto Y Heart Vessels; 2021 Jul; 36(7):955-964. PubMed ID: 33502572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions: Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Mahmud E; Naghi J; Ang L; Harrison J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jul; 10(13):1320-1327. PubMed ID: 28683937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic-Enhanced PCI Compared to the Traditional Manual Approach. Smilowitz NR; Moses JW; Sosa FA; Lerman B; Qureshi Y; Dalton KE; Privitera LT; Canone-Weber D; Singh V; Leon MB; Weisz G J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 Jul; 26(7):318-21. PubMed ID: 24993988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention is associated with lower patient radiation exposure in high-radial-volume centres: Insights from the RAY'ACT-1 study. Georges JL; Belle L; Meunier L; Dechery T; Khalifé K; Pecheux M; Elhaddad S; Amabile N; Pansieri M; Ballout J; Marchand X; Rouault G; Leddet P; Nugue O; Lucke N; Cattan S; Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Mar; 110(3):179-187. PubMed ID: 28117244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of radiological risk during coronary angioplasty procedures: comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches. Iwachow P; Miechowicz I; Kałmucki P; Dziki B; Szyszka A; Baszko A; Siminiak T Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1297-1303. PubMed ID: 28364175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study. Becher T; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Baumann S; El-Battrawy I; Fastner C; Kuschyk J; Papavassiliu T; Hoffmann U; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):505-509. PubMed ID: 27350417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention During COVID-19 Pandemic: Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness With Procedural Distancing. Sooknanan NN; Memon S; George JC J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 34(2):E87-E91. PubMed ID: 34928816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A propensity score matched valuation on feasibility of low frame rate fluoroscopy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with STEMI. Fan L; Luo Y; Chen Z; Cai W; Dong X; Lin C; Chen L Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 35(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 30386956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of radiation dose reduction due to real-time monitoring and visualization of peak skin dose during coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. Ichimoto E; Kadohira T; Nakayama T; De Gregorio J Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 91(4):717-722. PubMed ID: 28557313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resource Utilization During Elective Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Mangels D; Fregoso A; Ang L; Mahmud E J Invasive Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 32(12):E321-E325. PubMed ID: 32829309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient exposure to X-rays during coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention: results of a multicenter national survey. Georges JL; Belle L; Ricard C; Cattan S; Albert F; Hirsch JL; Monsegu J; Dibie A; Khalife K; Caussin C; Maccia C; Livarek B; Hanssen M; Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Apr; 83(5):729-38. PubMed ID: 24323486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Noise reduction technology reduces radiation dose in chronic total occlusions percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score-matched analysis. Maccagni D; Benincasa S; Bellini B; Candilio L; Poletti E; Carlino M; Colombo A; Azzalini L Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Aug; 34(8):1185-1192. PubMed ID: 29572584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A retrospective study of radiation dose measurements comparing different cath lab X-ray systems in a sample population of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions. McNeice AH; Brooks M; Hanratty CG; Stevenson M; Spratt JC; Walsh SJ Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 92(3):E254-E261. PubMed ID: 29411518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduction of radiation exposure during complex interventions for chronic total coronary occlusions: Implementing low dose radiation protocols without affecting procedural success rates. Werner GS; Glaser P; Coenen A; Moehlis H; Tischer KH; Koch M; Klingenbeck R Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 89(6):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 28112448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Reasons for partial manual assistance or manual conversion. Harrison J; Ang L; Naghi J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Patel MP; Reeves RR; Mahmud E Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Jul; 19(5 Pt A):526-531. PubMed ID: 29221959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment. Naganuma T; Chieffo A; Meliga E; Capodanno D; Park SJ; Onuma Y; Valgimigli M; Jegere S; Makkar RR; Palacios IF; Costopoulos C; Kim YH; Buszman PP; Chakravarty T; Sheiban I; Mehran R; Naber C; Margey R; Agnihotri A; Marra S; Capranzano P; Leon MB; Moses JW; Fajadet J; Lefevre T; Morice MC; Erglis A; Tamburino C; Alfieri O; Serruys PW; Colombo A JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Dec; 6(12):1242-9. PubMed ID: 24355114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determinants of fluoroscopy time for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the NCDR(®). Fazel R; Curtis J; Wang Y; Einstein AJ; Smith-Bindman R; Tsai TT; Chen J; Shah ND; Krumholz HM; Nallamothu BK Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Dec; 82(7):1091-105. PubMed ID: 23703793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of robotics and a suspended lead suit on physician radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary intervention. Madder RD; VanOosterhout S; Mulder A; Elmore M; Campbell J; Borgman A; Parker J; Wohns D Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(3):190-196. PubMed ID: 28041859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]