These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3240643)

  • 1. A phantom for electrical impedance tomography.
    Griffiths H
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1988; 9 Suppl A():15-20. PubMed ID: 3240643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shape deformation in two-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Boyle A; Adler A; Lionheart WR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Dec; 31(12):2185-93. PubMed ID: 22711769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A resistive mesh phantom for assessing the performance of EIT systems.
    Gagnon H; Cousineau M; Adler A; Hartinger AE
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Sep; 57(9):2257-66. PubMed ID: 20550982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrical conductivity imaging by magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).
    Oh SH; Han JY; Lee SY; Cho MH; Lee BI; Woo EJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2003 Oct; 50(4):875-8. PubMed ID: 14523975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feature-space assessment of electrical impedance tomography coregistered with computed tomography in detecting multiple contrast targets.
    Krishnan K; Liu J; Kohli K
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061903. PubMed ID: 24877814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrical impedance tomography of human brain function using reconstruction algorithms based on the finite element method.
    Bagshaw AP; Liston AD; Bayford RH; Tizzard A; Gibson AP; Tidswell AT; Sparkes MK; Dehghani H; Binnie CD; Holder DS
    Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):752-64. PubMed ID: 14568449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography for measuring electrical conductivity during electroporation.
    Kranjc M; Bajd F; Serša I; Miklavčič D
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Jun; 35(6):985-96. PubMed ID: 24844299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrical impedance tomography of complex conductivity distributions with noncircular boundary.
    Jain H; Isaacson D; Edic PM; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Nov; 44(11):1051-60. PubMed ID: 9353984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analytical solutions of electric potential and impedance for a multilayered spherical volume conductor excited by time-harmonic electric current source: application in brain EIT.
    Xiao C; Lei Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2663-74. PubMed ID: 15901961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A versatile high-permittivity phantom for EIT.
    Kao TJ; Saulnier GJ; Isaacson D; Szabo TL; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Nov; 55(11):2601-7. PubMed ID: 18990630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrical impedance tomography in 3D using two electrode planes: characterization and evaluation.
    Wagenaar J; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):922-37. PubMed ID: 27203154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation and real-time monitoring of data quality in electrical impedance tomography.
    Mamatjan Y; Grychtol B; Gaggero P; Justiz J; Koch VM; Adler A
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Nov; 32(11):1997-2005. PubMed ID: 23799682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimizing EIT image artefacts from mesh variability in finite element models.
    Adler A; Lionheart WR
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):823-34. PubMed ID: 21646712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography.
    Liu WP; Hua P; Webster JG
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1988; 9 Suppl A():131-5. PubMed ID: 3240641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite-element method in electrical impedance tomography.
    Woo EJ; Hua P; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1994 Sep; 32(5):530-6. PubMed ID: 7845069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simulation of effects of the electrode structure and material in the density measuring system of the peripheral nerve based on micro-electrical impedance tomography.
    Behkami S; Frounchi J; Ghaderi Pakdel F; Stieglitz T
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2018 Mar; 63(2):151-161. PubMed ID: 28076294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
    Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images.
    Boyle A; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):745-54. PubMed ID: 21646710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A broadband system for multifrequency static imaging in electrical impedance tomography.
    Riu PJ; Rosell J; Lozano A; Pallàs-Areny R
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1992; 13 Suppl A():61-5. PubMed ID: 1587112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.