These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32406721)

  • 1. Anticipatory memory for regular and random patterns.
    Yildirim I; Intraub H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):965-978. PubMed ID: 32406721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Independent operation of implicit working memory under cognitive load.
    Ji E; Lee KM; Kim MS
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Oct; 55():214-222. PubMed ID: 28892738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expectations and perceptual priming in a visual search task: Evidence from eye movements and behavior.
    Shurygina O; Kristjánsson Á; Tudge L; Chetverikov A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):489-499. PubMed ID: 30816788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Set size effects in spatial updating are independent of the online/offline updating strategy.
    Lu R; Yu C; Li Z; Mou W; Li Z
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):901-911. PubMed ID: 32324031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bridging the gap between visual temporary memory and working memory: The role of stimuli distinctiveness.
    Shoval R; Luria R; Makovski T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1258-1269. PubMed ID: 31647285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Saccadic selection does not eliminate attribute amnesia.
    Born S; Puntiroli M; Jordan D; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2165-2173. PubMed ID: 30883172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selection of macroreference frames in spatial memory.
    Kelly JW; Siegel ZD; Sjolund LA; Avraamides MN
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1278-1286. PubMed ID: 29931620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of contextual knowledge on spatial layout extrapolation.
    Ménétrier E; Didierjean A; Barbe V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1932-1945. PubMed ID: 30014317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A secondary task is not always costly: Context-based guidance of visual search survives interference from a demanding working memory task.
    Annac E; Zang X; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):381-399. PubMed ID: 30260470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective interference with image retention and generation: evidence for the workspace model.
    van der Meulen M; Logie RH; Della Sala S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1568-80. PubMed ID: 19096989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surface feature congruency effects in the object-reviewing paradigm are dependent on task memory demands.
    Kimchi R; Pirkner Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Aug; 21(4):1019-25. PubMed ID: 24474601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
    Kerzel D; Witzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
    Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative and qualitative differences in the top-down guiding attributes of visual search.
    Hulleman J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):942-964. PubMed ID: 32378936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring the contributions of spatial and non-spatial working memory to priming of pop-out.
    Ahn J; Patel TN; Buetti S; Lleras A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1012-1026. PubMed ID: 28176214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dentate gyrus supports slope recognition memory, shades of grey-context pattern separation and recognition memory, and CA3 supports pattern completion for object memory.
    Kesner RP; Kirk RA; Yu Z; Polansky C; Musso ND
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2016 Mar; 129():29-37. PubMed ID: 26318932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining the hierarchical nature of scene representations in memory.
    Castelhano MS; Fernandes S; Theriault J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1619-1633. PubMed ID: 30359054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of divided attention and of stimulus repetition on item-item binding in verbal working memory.
    Peterson DJ; Decker R; Naveh-Benjamin M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1955-1969. PubMed ID: 30869953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence of gradual loss of precision for simple features and complex objects in visual working memory.
    Rademaker RL; Park YE; Sack AT; Tong F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jun; 44(6):925-940. PubMed ID: 29494191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.