These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32407322)

  • 1. Effect of aging and body characteristics on facial sexual dimorphism in the Caucasian Population.
    Skomina Z; Verdenik M; Hren NI
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0231983. PubMed ID: 32407322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facial and body sexual dimorphism are not interconnected in the Maasai.
    Butovskaya ML; Rostovtseva VV; Mezentseva AA
    J Physiol Anthropol; 2022 Jan; 41(1):3. PubMed ID: 34996526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population.
    Talbert L; Kau CH; Christou T; Vlachos C; Souccar N
    J Orthod; 2014 Mar; 41(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 24671286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of facial sexual dimorphism in children aged between 12 and 15 years: a three-dimensional longitudinal study.
    Koudelová J; Brůžek J; Cagáňová V; Krajíček V; Velemínská J
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Aug; 18(3):175-84. PubMed ID: 25958883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional shape variation and sexual dimorphism of the face, nose, and mouth of Japanese individuals.
    Imaizumi K; Taniguchi K; Ogawa Y; Matsuzaki K; Maekawa H; Nagata T; Mochimaru M; Kouchi M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109878. PubMed ID: 31377687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Older adults' facial characteristics compared to young adults' in correlation with edentulism: a cross sectional study.
    Skomina Z; Kočevar D; Verdenik M; Hren NI
    BMC Geriatr; 2022 Jun; 22(1):503. PubMed ID: 35701747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual dimorphism of facial appearance in ageing human adults: A cross-sectional study.
    Mydlová M; Dupej J; Koudelová J; Velemínská J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():519.e1-519.e9. PubMed ID: 26548377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of sex and age on facial shape directional asymmetry in adults: A 3D landmarks-based method study.
    Harnádková K; Kočandrlová K; Kožejová Jaklová L; Dupej J; Velemínská J
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0288702. PubMed ID: 37535545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional evaluation of important surgical landmarks of the face during aging.
    Modabber A; Peters F; Galster H; Möhlhenrich SC; Bock A; Heitzer M; Hölzle F; Kniha K
    Ann Anat; 2020 Mar; 228():151435. PubMed ID: 31678402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Sexual dimorphism and facial cavities: a 3D imaging volumetric study].
    Bassil-Nassif N; Bouserhal J; Treil J; Braga J; Garcia R
    Orthod Fr; 2011 Jun; 82(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 21624341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A lack of sexual dimorphism in width-to-height ratio in white European faces using 2D photographs, 3D scans, and anthropometry.
    Kramer RS; Jones AL; Ward R
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e42705. PubMed ID: 22880088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional gender differences in facial form of children in the North East of England.
    Bugaighis I; Mattick CR; Tiddeman B; Hobson R
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 35(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 21531786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-Dimensional Anthropometric Evaluation of Facial Morphology.
    Celebi AA; Kau CH; Ozaydin B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 28(5):e470-e474. PubMed ID: 28665846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Was facial width-to-height ratio subject to sexual selection pressures? A life course approach.
    Hodges-Simeon CR; Albert G; Richardson GB; McHale TS; Weinberg SM; Gurven M; Gaulin SJC
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0240284. PubMed ID: 33711068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anthropometric Analysis of the Face.
    Zacharopoulos GV; Manios A; Kau CH; Velagrakis G; Tzanakakis GN; de Bree E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 27(1):e71-5. PubMed ID: 26703056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexual dimorphism in facial shape of modern Buryats of Southern Siberia.
    Rostovtseva VV; Mezentseva AA; Windhager S; Butovskaya ML
    Am J Hum Biol; 2021 Mar; 33(2):e23458. PubMed ID: 32596969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional facial characteristics of Caucasian infants without cleft and correlation with body measurements.
    White JE; Ayoub AF; Hosey MT; Bock M; Bowman A; Bowman J; Siebert JP; Ray A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Nov; 41(6):593-602. PubMed ID: 15516161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface facial modelling and allometry in relation to sexual dimorphism.
    Velemínská J; Bigoni L; Krajíček V; Borský J; Šmahelová D; Cagáňová V; Peterka M
    Homo; 2012 Apr; 63(2):81-93. PubMed ID: 22425585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of soft-tissue morphology of the face in 1,050 young adults.
    Borman H; Ozgür F; Gürsu G
    Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Mar; 42(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 10096619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology.
    Liu Y; Kau CH; Talbert L; Pan F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1890-4. PubMed ID: 25072972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.