BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32407557)

  • 1. Evaluation of publication bias in response interruption and redirection: A meta-analysis.
    Dowdy A; Tincani M; Schneider WJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Sep; 53(4):2151-2171. PubMed ID: 32407557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Publication bias in studies of an applied behavior-analytic intervention: an initial analysis.
    Sham E; Smith T
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):663-78. PubMed ID: 24990802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of noncontingent music and response interruption and redirection on vocal stereotypy.
    Gibbs AR; Tullis CA; Thomas R; Elkins B
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Oct; 51(4):899-914. PubMed ID: 29911301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Teacher-Implemented Response Interruption and Redirection: Training, Evaluation, and Descriptive Analysis of Treatment Integrity.
    Giles A; Swain S; Quinn L; Weifenbach B
    Behav Modif; 2018 Jan; 42(1):148-169. PubMed ID: 28934869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Data analysis of response interruption and redirection as a treatment for vocal stereotypy.
    Wunderlich KL; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Dec; 48(4):749-64. PubMed ID: 26173813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Defining the hidden evidence in autism research. Forty per cent of rigorously designed clinical trials remain unpublished - a cross-sectional analysis.
    Mechler K; Hoffmann GF; Dittmann RW; Ries M
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2017 Dec; 26(4):. PubMed ID: 27862603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of response interruption and redirection and competing items on vocal stereotypy and appropriate vocalizations.
    Shawler LA; Dianda M; Miguel CF
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jan; 53(1):355-365. PubMed ID: 31281959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Further Analysis of the Immediate and Subsequent Effect of RIRD on Vocal Stereotypy.
    Sivaraman M; Rapp JT
    Behav Modif; 2020 Sep; 44(5):646-669. PubMed ID: 30961352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An analysis of treatment integrity of response interruption and redirection.
    Colón CL; Ahearn WH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 May; 52(2):337-354. PubMed ID: 30648261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Further evaluation of response interruption and redirection as treatment for stereotypy.
    Ahrens EN; Lerman DC; Kodak T; Worsdell AS; Keegan C
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2011; 44(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 21541130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parametric analysis of response interruption and redirection as treatment for stereotypy.
    Saini V; Gregory MK; Uran KJ; Fantetti MA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 25640901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of toy removal and number of demands on vocal stereotypy during response interruption and redirection.
    Toper-Korkmaz O; Lerman DC; Tsami L
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Oct; 51(4):757-768. PubMed ID: 30155894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Publication bias in psychological science: comment on Ferguson and Brannick (2012).
    Rothstein HR; Bushman BJ
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 22369520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of matched stimulation and response interruption and redirection on vocal stereotypy.
    Love JJ; Miguel CF; Fernand JK; LaBrie JK
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(3):549-64. PubMed ID: 23060668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.
    Song F; Parekh S; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder J; Sutton AJ; Hing C; Kwok CS; Pang C; Harvey I
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. PubMed ID: 20181324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publication of Randomized Clinical Trials in Pediatric Research: A Follow-up Study.
    Crockett LK; Okoli GN; Neilson CJ; Rabbani R; Abou-Setta AM; Klassen TP
    JAMA Netw Open; 2018 May; 1(1):e180156. PubMed ID: 30646048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis of parent-mediated interventions for young children with autism spectrum disorder.
    Nevill RE; Lecavalier L; Stratis EA
    Autism; 2018 Feb; 22(2):84-98. PubMed ID: 29490483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing response blocking and response interruption/redirection on levels of motor stereotypy: Effects of data analysis procedures.
    DeRosa NM; Novak MD; Morley AJ; Roane HS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 Oct; 52(4):1021-1033. PubMed ID: 31642524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing Public Masturbation in Individuals With ASD: An Assessment of Response Interruption Procedures.
    Cividini-Motta C; Moore K; Fish LM; Priehs JC; Ahearn WH
    Behav Modif; 2020 May; 44(3):429-448. PubMed ID: 30632381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.