These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3240805)

  • 21. Stereotest Comparison: Efficacy, Reliability, and Variability of a New Glasses-Free Stereotest.
    McCaslin AG; Vancleef K; Hubert L; Read JCA; Port N
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Aug; 9(9):29. PubMed ID: 32879785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Classification and misclassification of sensory monofixation in intermittent exotropia.
    Hatt SR; Leske DA; Mohney BG; Brodsky MC; Holmes JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jul; 150(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 20381008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. ASTEROID stereotest v1.0: lower stereo thresholds using smaller, denser and faster dots.
    Read JCA; Wong ZY; Yek X; Wong YX; Bachtoula O; Llamas-Cornejo I; Serrano-Pedraza I
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 Nov; 40(6):815-827. PubMed ID: 32989799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Final version of the Distance Randot Stereotest: normative data, reliability, and validity.
    Wang J; Hatt SR; O'Connor AR; Drover JR; Adams R; Birch EE; Holmes JM
    J AAPOS; 2010 Apr; 14(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 20199880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) test.
    Holmes JM; Fawcett SL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):193-5. PubMed ID: 15652852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Randot stereoacuity does not accurately predict ability to perform two practical tests of depth perception at a near distance.
    Long J; Siu C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Oct; 82(10):912-5. PubMed ID: 16276324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Manufacturer changes lead to clinically important differences between two editions of the TNO stereotest.
    van Doorn LL; Evans BJ; Edgar DF; Fortuin MF
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 Mar; 34(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 24355036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stereopsis in small-angle strabismus.
    Rutstein RP; Eskridge JB
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1984 Aug; 61(8):491-8. PubMed ID: 6496643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Glasses-free randot stereotest.
    Kim J; Hong JY; Hong K; Yang HK; Han SB; Hwang JM; Lee B
    J Biomed Opt; 2015 Jun; 20(6):065004. PubMed ID: 26057031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Application of disparity discriminating accuracy test in evaluating the stereopsis of postoperative intermittent exotropia].
    Feng LX; Yao JY; Chen L; Tang Y; Hou F
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 52(8):584-8. PubMed ID: 27562279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of factors influencing distance stereoacuity on Frisby-Davis Distance Test (FD2) in intermittent exotropia.
    Saxena R; Kakkar A; Menon V; Sharma P; Phuljhele S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2011 Aug; 95(8):1098-101. PubMed ID: 20935306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Recognition of TNO stereotest figures in the absence of true stereopsis.
    Charman WN; Jennings JA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Jul; 72(7):535-6. PubMed ID: 8539019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of a new Distance Randot stereoacuity test.
    Fu VL; Birch EE; Holmes JM
    J AAPOS; 2006 Oct; 10(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 17070476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Comparison of the Kolling distance vision stereo-test with current stereo-test procedures].
    Schiefer U; Brenner-Delarbre B; Schütte E; Aulhorn E
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1989; 86(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 2737573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual acuity and stereoacuity among mentally retarded children.
    Letourneau JE; Beaulne C; Duplessis L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Dec; 75(3 Pt 2):1179-85. PubMed ID: 1484783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Near stereoacuity: development in preschool children; normative values and screening for binocular vision abnormalities; a study of 115 children.
    Tomaç S; Altay Y
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2000; 15(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 10960225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Absolute threshold of stereopsis using the Frisby stereotest.
    Simmerman JS
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1984 Jan; 55(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 6699346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reliability and validity of an automated computerized visual acuity and stereoacuity test in children using an interactive video game.
    Ma DJ; Yang HK; Hwang JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Jul; 156(1):195-201.e1. PubMed ID: 23582763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The moving Dynamic Random Dot Stereosize test: development, age norms, and comparison with the Frisby, Randot, and Stereo Smile tests.
    Leat SJ; Pierre JS; Hassan-Abadi S; Faubert J
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2001; 38(5):284-94. PubMed ID: 11587177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development of distant stereoacuity in visually normal children as measured by the Frisby-Davis distance stereotest.
    Hong SW; Park SC
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 92(9):1186-9. PubMed ID: 18614571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.