126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32408188)
1. "Quantifying the precision of ecological risk: Misunderstandings and errors in the methods for assessment factors versus species sensitivity distributions".
Belanger SE; Carr GJ
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2020 Jul; 198():110684. PubMed ID: 32408188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures.
Belanger S; Barron M; Craig P; Dyer S; Galay-Burgos M; Hamer M; Marshall S; Posthuma L; Raimondo S; Whitehouse P
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):664-674. PubMed ID: 27531323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Species sensitivity distributions for use in environmental protection, assessment, and management of aquatic ecosystems for 12 386 chemicals.
Posthuma L; van Gils J; Zijp MC; van de Meent D; de Zwart D
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Apr; 38(4):905-917. PubMed ID: 30675920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and application of the SSD approach in scientific case studies for ecological risk assessment.
Del Signore A; Hendriks AJ; Lenders HJ; Leuven RS; Breure AM
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Sep; 35(9):2149-61. PubMed ID: 27144499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mean Species Abundance as a Measure of Ecotoxicological Risk.
Hoeks S; Huijbregts MAJ; Douziech M; Hendriks AJ; Oldenkamp R
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Nov; 39(11):2304-2313. PubMed ID: 32786097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Which distribution to choose for deriving a species sensitivity distribution? Implications from analysis of acute and chronic ecotoxicity data.
Yanagihara M; Hiki K; Iwasaki Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2024 Jun; 278():116379. PubMed ID: 38714082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Environmental benchmarks based on ecotoxicological assessment with planktonic species might not adequately protect benthic assemblages in lotic systems.
Vidal T; Santos JI; Queirós L; Ré A; Abrantes N; Gonçalves FJM; Pereira JL
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 668():1289-1297. PubMed ID: 31018468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the quantification of intertest variability in ecotoxicity data with application to species sensitivity distributions.
Hickey GL; Craig PS; Luttik R; de Zwart D
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2012 Aug; 31(8):1903-10. PubMed ID: 22619109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Competing statistical methods for the fitting of normal species sensitivity distributions: recommendations for practitioners.
Hickey GL; Craig PS
Risk Anal; 2012 Jul; 32(7):1232-43. PubMed ID: 22050459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Augmenting aquatic species sensitivity distributions with interspecies toxicity estimation models.
Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Jackson CR; Barron MG
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Mar; 33(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 24214839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of species sensitivity distributions for wildlife using interspecies toxicity correlation models.
Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Barron MG
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 May; 42(9):3447-52. PubMed ID: 18522132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and application of the adverse outcome pathway framework for understanding and predicting chronic toxicity: I. Challenges and research needs in ecotoxicology.
Groh KJ; Carvalho RN; Chipman JK; Denslow ND; Halder M; Murphy CA; Roelofs D; Rolaki A; Schirmer K; Watanabe KH
Chemosphere; 2015 Feb; 120():764-77. PubMed ID: 25439131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. To Split or Not to Split: Characterizing Chemical Pollution Impacts in Aquatic Ecosystems with Species Sensitivity Distributions for Specific Taxonomic Groups.
Oginah SA; Posthuma L; Hauschild M; Slootweg J; Kosnik M; Fantke P
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Oct; 57(39):14526-14538. PubMed ID: 37732841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A probabilistic method for species sensitivity distributions taking into account the inherent uncertainty and variability of effects to estimate environmental risk.
Gottschalk F; Nowack B
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 22745057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Potential application of population models in the European ecological risk assessment of chemicals. II. Review of models and their potential to address environmental protection aims.
Galic N; Hommen U; Baveco JM; van den Brink PJ
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6(3):338-60. PubMed ID: 20821698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of aquatic toxicity benchmarks for oil products using species sensitivity distributions.
Barron MG; Hemmer MJ; Jackson CR
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):610-5. PubMed ID: 23554001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revisiting assessment factors for species sensitivity distributions as a function of sample size and variation in species sensitivity.
Kamo M; Hayashi TI; Iwasaki Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2022 Nov; 246():114170. PubMed ID: 36242822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deriving field-based species sensitivity distributions (f-SSDs) from stacked species distribution models (S-SDMs).
Schipper AM; Posthuma L; de Zwart D; Huijbregts MA
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14464-71. PubMed ID: 25418062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The extrapolation problem and how population modeling can help.
Forbes VE; Calow P; Sibly RM
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2008 Oct; 27(10):1987-94. PubMed ID: 19108041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of chemical toxicity distributions to ecotoxicology data requirements under REACH.
Williams ES; Berninger JP; Brooks BW
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Aug; 30(8):1943-54. PubMed ID: 21590796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
