These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32408188)

  • 1. "Quantifying the precision of ecological risk: Misunderstandings and errors in the methods for assessment factors versus species sensitivity distributions".
    Belanger SE; Carr GJ
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2020 Jul; 198():110684. PubMed ID: 32408188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures.
    Belanger S; Barron M; Craig P; Dyer S; Galay-Burgos M; Hamer M; Marshall S; Posthuma L; Raimondo S; Whitehouse P
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):664-674. PubMed ID: 27531323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Species sensitivity distributions for use in environmental protection, assessment, and management of aquatic ecosystems for 12 386 chemicals.
    Posthuma L; van Gils J; Zijp MC; van de Meent D; de Zwart D
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Apr; 38(4):905-917. PubMed ID: 30675920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and application of the SSD approach in scientific case studies for ecological risk assessment.
    Del Signore A; Hendriks AJ; Lenders HJ; Leuven RS; Breure AM
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Sep; 35(9):2149-61. PubMed ID: 27144499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mean Species Abundance as a Measure of Ecotoxicological Risk.
    Hoeks S; Huijbregts MAJ; Douziech M; Hendriks AJ; Oldenkamp R
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Nov; 39(11):2304-2313. PubMed ID: 32786097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Which distribution to choose for deriving a species sensitivity distribution? Implications from analysis of acute and chronic ecotoxicity data.
    Yanagihara M; Hiki K; Iwasaki Y
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2024 Jun; 278():116379. PubMed ID: 38714082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environmental benchmarks based on ecotoxicological assessment with planktonic species might not adequately protect benthic assemblages in lotic systems.
    Vidal T; Santos JI; Queirós L; Ré A; Abrantes N; Gonçalves FJM; Pereira JL
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 668():1289-1297. PubMed ID: 31018468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the quantification of intertest variability in ecotoxicity data with application to species sensitivity distributions.
    Hickey GL; Craig PS; Luttik R; de Zwart D
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2012 Aug; 31(8):1903-10. PubMed ID: 22619109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Competing statistical methods for the fitting of normal species sensitivity distributions: recommendations for practitioners.
    Hickey GL; Craig PS
    Risk Anal; 2012 Jul; 32(7):1232-43. PubMed ID: 22050459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Augmenting aquatic species sensitivity distributions with interspecies toxicity estimation models.
    Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Jackson CR; Barron MG
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Mar; 33(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 24214839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of species sensitivity distributions for wildlife using interspecies toxicity correlation models.
    Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Barron MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 May; 42(9):3447-52. PubMed ID: 18522132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and application of the adverse outcome pathway framework for understanding and predicting chronic toxicity: I. Challenges and research needs in ecotoxicology.
    Groh KJ; Carvalho RN; Chipman JK; Denslow ND; Halder M; Murphy CA; Roelofs D; Rolaki A; Schirmer K; Watanabe KH
    Chemosphere; 2015 Feb; 120():764-77. PubMed ID: 25439131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. To Split or Not to Split: Characterizing Chemical Pollution Impacts in Aquatic Ecosystems with Species Sensitivity Distributions for Specific Taxonomic Groups.
    Oginah SA; Posthuma L; Hauschild M; Slootweg J; Kosnik M; Fantke P
    Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Oct; 57(39):14526-14538. PubMed ID: 37732841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A probabilistic method for species sensitivity distributions taking into account the inherent uncertainty and variability of effects to estimate environmental risk.
    Gottschalk F; Nowack B
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 22745057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential application of population models in the European ecological risk assessment of chemicals. II. Review of models and their potential to address environmental protection aims.
    Galic N; Hommen U; Baveco JM; van den Brink PJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6(3):338-60. PubMed ID: 20821698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of aquatic toxicity benchmarks for oil products using species sensitivity distributions.
    Barron MG; Hemmer MJ; Jackson CR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):610-5. PubMed ID: 23554001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revisiting assessment factors for species sensitivity distributions as a function of sample size and variation in species sensitivity.
    Kamo M; Hayashi TI; Iwasaki Y
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2022 Nov; 246():114170. PubMed ID: 36242822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deriving field-based species sensitivity distributions (f-SSDs) from stacked species distribution models (S-SDMs).
    Schipper AM; Posthuma L; de Zwart D; Huijbregts MA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14464-71. PubMed ID: 25418062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The extrapolation problem and how population modeling can help.
    Forbes VE; Calow P; Sibly RM
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2008 Oct; 27(10):1987-94. PubMed ID: 19108041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of chemical toxicity distributions to ecotoxicology data requirements under REACH.
    Williams ES; Berninger JP; Brooks BW
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Aug; 30(8):1943-54. PubMed ID: 21590796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.