These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32408188)

  • 21. Comment on ET&C perspectives, November 2015-A holistic view.
    Fox DR; Landis WG
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Jun; 35(6):1337-9. PubMed ID: 27216838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mechanistic Effect Modeling Approach for the Extrapolation of Species Sensitivity.
    Gergs A; Rakel KJ; Liesy D; Zenker A; Classen S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Aug; 53(16):9818-9825. PubMed ID: 31356070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of specific versus literature species sensitivity distributions for herbicides risk assessment.
    Larras F; Gregorio V; Bouchez A; Montuelle B; Chèvre N
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Feb; 23(4):3042-52. PubMed ID: 26396014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can We Reasonably Predict Chronic Species Sensitivity Distributions from Acute Species Sensitivity Distributions?
    Hiki K; Iwasaki Y
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Oct; 54(20):13131-13136. PubMed ID: 32924457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Forecasting risk along a river basin using a probabilistic and deterministic model for environmental risk assessment of effluents through ecotoxicological evaluation and GIS.
    Gutiérrez S; Fernandez C; Barata C; Tarazona JV
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(2):294-303. PubMed ID: 19875154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Response to: Quantifying the precision of ecological risk: Misunderstandings and errors in the methods for assessment factors versus species sensitivity distributions by Drs. Scott E. Belanger and Gregory J. Carr.
    Kamo M; Sorgog K
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2021 Jan; 207():111542. PubMed ID: 33254402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Time-dependent species sensitivity distributions.
    Fox DR; Billoir E
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Feb; 32(2):378-83. PubMed ID: 23161611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Integrating Exposure and Effect Distributions with the Ecotoxicity Risk Calculator: Case Studies with Crop Protection Products.
    Dreier DA; Rodney SI; Moore DR; Grant SL; Chen W; Valenti TW; Brain RA
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2021 Mar; 17(2):321-330. PubMed ID: 32949192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using ecological-niche modeling as a conservation tool for freshwater species: live-bearing fishes in central Mexico.
    Domínguez-Domínguez O; Martínez-Meyer E; Zambrano L; De León GP
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1730-9. PubMed ID: 17181808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Probabilistic ecological risk assessment of heavy metals using the sensitivity of resident organisms in four Korean rivers.
    Park J; Lee S; Lee E; Noh H; Seo Y; Lim H; Shin H; Lee I; Jung H; Na T; Kim SD
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Nov; 183():109483. PubMed ID: 31362159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A probabilistic model of reserve design.
    Bascompte J; Luque B; Olarrea J; Lacasa L
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jul; 247(1):205-11. PubMed ID: 17418238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ecological hazard assessment via species sensitivity distributions: The non-exchangeability issue.
    Migliorati S; Monti GS; Vighi M
    Biom J; 2021 Apr; 63(4):875-892. PubMed ID: 33491802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of species sensitivity distributions to characterize hazard for insecticidal traits.
    Boeckman CJ; Layton R
    J Invertebr Pathol; 2017 Jan; 142():68-70. PubMed ID: 27576154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Toward an ecotoxicological risk assessment of microplastics: Comparison of available hazard and exposure data in freshwaters.
    Adam V; Yang T; Nowack B
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Feb; 38(2):436-447. PubMed ID: 30488983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Developing species sensitivity distributions for metallic nanomaterials considering the characteristics of nanomaterials, experimental conditions, and different types of endpoints.
    Chen G; Peijnenburg WJGM; Xiao Y; Vijver MG
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2018 Feb; 112():563-570. PubMed ID: 28390859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Threatened species and the potential loss of phylogenetic diversity: conservation scenarios based on estimated extinction probabilities and phylogenetic risk analysis.
    Faith DP
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1461-70. PubMed ID: 18798854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A refined ecological risk assessment for California red-legged frog, Delta smelt, and California tiger salamander exposed to malathion.
    Clemow YH; Manning GE; Breton RL; Winchell MF; Padilla L; Rodney SI; Hanzas JP; Estes TL; Budreski K; Toth BN; Hill KL; Priest CD; Teed RS; Knopper LD; Moore DR; Stone CT; Whatling P
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Mar; 14(2):224-239. PubMed ID: 29087623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development of a decision support system to manage contamination in marine ecosystems.
    Dagnino A; Viarengo A
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jan; 466-467():119-26. PubMed ID: 23892026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Are engineered nano iron oxide particles safe? an environmental risk assessment by probabilistic exposure, effects and risk modeling.
    Wang Y; Deng L; Caballero-Guzman A; Nowack B
    Nanotoxicology; 2016 Dec; 10(10):1545-1554. PubMed ID: 27781563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Protectiveness of species sensitivity distribution hazard concentrations for acute toxicity used in endangered species risk assessment.
    Raimondo S; Vivian DN; Delos C; Barron MG
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2008 Dec; 27(12):2599-607. PubMed ID: 18699704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.