182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32408361)
21. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration versus biopsy for diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis: Systematic review and comparative meta-analysis.
Yoon SB; Moon SH; Song TJ; Kim JH; Kim MH
Dig Endosc; 2021 Nov; 33(7):1024-1033. PubMed ID: 33030283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of 19G FNA Versus 22G FNB Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Sampling of Subepithelial Tumors: Is Bigger Better?
Li J; Feng J; Gao S; Wang W; Huang L; Yi S; Xu H; Ding XW
J Ultrasound Med; 2024 Apr; 43(4):761-770. PubMed ID: 38167820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dry suction versus wet suction technique of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
Xu S; Wang J; Guo J; Xie F; Qiao W; Meng Y; Peng P; Hu H; Huang Y; Liu S; Qin M; Yao J; Li Y
Trials; 2023 Dec; 24(1):805. PubMed ID: 38093381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of 22G reverse-beveled versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions.
Alatawi A; Beuvon F; Grabar S; Leblanc S; Chaussade S; Terris B; Barret M; Prat F
United European Gastroenterol J; 2015 Aug; 3(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 26279842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy.
Li Z; Liu W; Xu X; Li P
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2022 Sep; 56(8):668-678. PubMed ID: 35470294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without macroscopic on-site evaluation: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial.
Mangiavillano B; Crinò SF; Facciorusso A; Di Matteo F; Barbera C; Larghi A; Rizzatti G; Carrara S; Spadaccini M; Auriemma F; Fabbri C; Binda C; Coluccio C; Marocchi G; Staiano T; Conti Bellocchi MC; Bernardoni L; Eusebi LH; Cirota GG; De Nucci G; Stigliano S; Manes G; Bonanno G; Ofosu A; Lamonaca L; Paduano D; Spatola F; Repici A
Endoscopy; 2023 Feb; 55(2):129-137. PubMed ID: 36044915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Core needle versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study.
Vanbiervliet G; Napoléon B; Saint Paul MC; Sakarovitch C; Wangermez M; Bichard P; Subtil C; Koch S; Grandval P; Gincul R; Karsenti D; Heyries L; Duchmann JC; Bourgaux JF; Levy M; Calament G; Fumex F; Pujol B; Lefort C; Poincloux L; Pagenault M; Bonin EA; Fabre M; Barthet M
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1063-70. PubMed ID: 25098612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB
Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms.
Strand DS; Jeffus SK; Sauer BG; Wang AY; Stelow EB; Shami VM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Sep; 42(9):751-8. PubMed ID: 24550162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.
van Riet PA; Larghi A; Attili F; Rindi G; Nguyen NQ; Ruszkiewicz A; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Aslanian H; Farrell J; Robert M; Adeniran A; Van Der Merwe S; Roskams T; Chang K; Lin F; Lee JG; Arcidiacono PG; Petrone M; Doglioni C; Iglesias-Garcia J; Abdulkader I; Giovannini M; Bories E; Poizat F; Santo E; Scapa E; Marmor S; Bucobo JC; Buscaglia JM; Heimann A; Wu M; Baldaque-Silva F; Moro CF; Erler NS; Biermann K; Poley JW; Cahen DL; Bruno MJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb; 89(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 30367877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Histologic diagnosis of pancreatic masses using 25-gauge endoscopic ultrasound needles with and without a core trap: a multicenter randomized trial.
Kamata K; Kitano M; Yasukawa S; Kudo M; Chiba Y; Ogura T; Higuchi K; Fukutake N; Ashida R; Yamasaki T; Nebiki H; Hirose S; Hoki N; Asada M; Yazumi S; Takaoka M; Okazaki K; Matsuda F; Okabe Y; Yanagisawa A
Endoscopy; 2016 Jul; 48(7):632-8. PubMed ID: 27129137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial.
Itonaga M; Yasukawa S; Shimokawa T; Takenaka M; Fukutake N; Ogura T; Sakagami J; Shiomi H; Okura Y; Inatomi O; Matsumoto H; Kurita A; Suzuki A; Tanaka K; Kitano M
Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):816. PubMed ID: 31888733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The difference in histological yield between 19G EUS-FNA and EUS-fine-needle biopsy needles.
Ang TL; Li JW; Kwek ABE; Thurairajah PH; Wang LM
Endosc Ultrasound; 2019; 8(4):255-260. PubMed ID: 31115385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study.
Asokkumar R; Yung Ka C; Loh T; Kah Ling L; Gek San T; Ying H; Tan D; Khor C; Lim T; Soetikno R
Endosc Int Open; 2019 Aug; 7(8):E955-E963. PubMed ID: 31367675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. High diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of the new 20G procore needle for EUS-guided tissue acquisition: Results of a large multicentre retrospective study.
Fabbri C; Fornelli A; Fuccio L; Giovanelli S; Tarantino I; Antonini F; Liotta R; Frazzoni L; Gusella P; La Marca M; Barresi L; Macarri G; Traina M; De Biase D; Fiorino S; Jovine E; Larghi A; Cennamo V
Endosc Ultrasound; 2019; 8(4):261-268. PubMed ID: 31115386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
Gkolfakis P; Crinò SF; Tziatzios G; Ramai D; Papaefthymiou A; Papanikolaou IS; Triantafyllou K; Arvanitakis M; Lisotti A; Fusaroli P; Mangiavillano B; Carrara S; Repici A; Hassan C; Facciorusso A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Jun; 95(6):1067-1077.e15. PubMed ID: 35124072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. 22-gauge core
Sterlacci W; Sioulas AD; Veits L; Gönüllü P; Schachschal G; Groth S; Anders M; Kontos CK; Topalidis T; Hinsch A; Vieth M; Rösch T; Denzer UW
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8820-8830. PubMed ID: 27818598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
