554 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32409828)
1. A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Foley KT; Glassman SD; Shaffrey CI; Wang MY; Park P; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurgery; 2020 Sep; 87(3):555-562. PubMed ID: 32409828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.
Chan AK; Bydon M; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Shaffrey CI; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Michalopoulos GD; Guan J; Haid RW; Agarwal N; Park C; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jan; 54(1):E2. PubMed ID: 36587409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E13. PubMed ID: 31042655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 grade-1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
He D; He W; Tian W; Liu B; Liu Y; Sun Y; Xing Y; Lang Z; Wang Y; Ma T; Liu M
Orthop Surg; 2023 Jun; 15(6):1477-1487. PubMed ID: 37154089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up.
Kuo CH; Chang PY; Wu JC; Chang HK; Fay LY; Tu TH; Cheng H; Huang WC
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E3. PubMed ID: 26721577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
Han XG; Tang GQ; Han X; Xing YG; Zhang Q; He D; Tian W
Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):2093-2101. PubMed ID: 34596342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Chan AY; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E3. PubMed ID: 29290130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; McGirt MJ; Asher AL
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jun; 24(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 26895529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiological adjacent-segment degeneration in L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison between dynamic stabilization and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Kuo CH; Huang WC; Wu JC; Tu TH; Fay LY; Wu CL; Cheng H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 29856306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):234-241. PubMed ID: 30544348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Percutaneous Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE RA-TLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note and Two Years Clinical Results.
Chang M; Wang L; Yuan S; Tian Y; Zhao Y; Liu X
Pain Physician; 2022 Jan; 25(1):E73-E86. PubMed ID: 35051154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.
Alex Sielatycki J; Devin CJ; Pennings J; Koscielski M; Metcalf T; Archer KR; Dunn R; Craig Humphreys S; Hodges S
Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):829-840. PubMed ID: 33346156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does loss of spondylolisthesis reduction impact clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
Steinhaus ME; Vaishnav AS; Shah SP; Clark NJ; Chaudhary CB; Othman YA; Urakawa H; Samuel AM; Lovecchio FC; Sheha ED; McAnany SJ; Qureshi SA
Spine J; 2022 Jan; 22(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 34118417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 22120269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Davis BJ; Aaronson O; Devin C; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Aug; 15(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 21529203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does the Predominant Pain Location Influence Functional Outcomes, Satisfaction, and Return to Work After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion For Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?
Goh GS; Yue WM; Guo CM; Tan SB; Chen JL
Clin Spine Surg; 2022 Feb; 35(1):E143-E149. PubMed ID: 34008509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
