557 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32409828)
21. A protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT).
de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Kuijk SM; Evers SM; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Oct; 17(1):417. PubMed ID: 27716168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In Single-Level, Open, Posterior Lumbar Fusion, Does Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Posterolateral Fusion Lead to Better Outcomes?
Chanbour H; Steinle AM; Tang AR; Gardocki RJ; Abtahi AM; Stephens BF; Zuckerman SL
Neurosurgery; 2023 Jan; 92(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 36519862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Dec; 24(8):479-84. PubMed ID: 21336176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ten-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
Kwon JW; Park Y; Lee BH; Yoon SR; Ha JW; Kim H; Suk KS; Moon SH; Kim HS; Lee HM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Jun; 47(11):773-780. PubMed ID: 35125463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Predictors of the Best Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Surgery for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Shaffrey CI; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurgery; 2020 Nov; 87(6):1130-1138. PubMed ID: 32497184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Zuckerman SL; Godil SS; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):230-8. PubMed ID: 23321379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I: Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery.
Brodano GB; Martikos K; Lolli F; Gasbarrini A; Cioni A; Bandiera S; Silvestre MD; Boriani S; Greggi T
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Dec; 28(10):E559-64. PubMed ID: 24136060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Anterolateral versus posterior minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion surgery for spondylolisthesis: comparison of outcomes from a global, multicenter study at 12-months follow-up.
Pereira P; Park Y; Arzoglou V; Charles YP; Krutko A; Senker W; Park SW; Franke J; Fuentes S; Bordon G; Song Y; He S; Vialle E; Mlyavykh S; Varanda P; Hosszu T; Bhagat S; Hong JY; Vanhauwaert D; de la Dehesa P
Spine J; 2023 Oct; 23(10):1494-1505. PubMed ID: 37236367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Effects of robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and traditional open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis].
Cui GY; Tian W; He D; Xing YG; Liu B; Yuan Q; Wang YQ; Sun YQ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 55(7):543-548. PubMed ID: 28655085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of 270-degree percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression under local anesthesia and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of geriatric lateral recess stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Li Y; Cheng X; Chen B
J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 18(1):183. PubMed ID: 36895012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Patient-reported and radiographic outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis with or without reduction: A comparative study.
Fan G; Zhang H; Guan X; Gu G; Wu X; Hu A; Gu X; He S
J Clin Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 33():111-118. PubMed ID: 27443498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].
Wen J; Yang Y; Zhang H; Liu L; Liu YL; Liu Y; Wang D; Wang ZP
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 Mar; 32(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 30921999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Levin JM; Tanenbaum JE; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Overley SC
Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):1088-1098. PubMed ID: 29452283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Direct Versus Indirect Decompression with Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Matched-Pair Comparison Analysis.
Lin GX; Akbary K; Kotheeranurak V; Quillo-Olvera J; Jo HJ; Yang XW; Mahatthanatrakul A; Kim JS
World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e898-e909. PubMed ID: 30099187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: Comparison Between Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
Kim JY; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1284-93. PubMed ID: 26072461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Low-Grade Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
Bovonratwet P; Samuel AM; Mok JK; Vaishnav AS; Morse KW; Song J; Steinhaus ME; Jordan YJ; Gang CH; Qureshi SA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Nov; 47(21):1505-1514. PubMed ID: 35867599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of lumbar surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Glassman SD; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):2885-91. PubMed ID: 24768731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Intraoperative reduction does not result in better outcomes in low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with neurogenic symptoms after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-a 5-year follow-up study.
Tay KS; Bassi A; Yeo W; Yue WM
Spine J; 2016 Feb; 16(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 26515392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
