575 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32409828)
41. Intraoperative reduction does not result in better outcomes in low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with neurogenic symptoms after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-a 5-year follow-up study.
Tay KS; Bassi A; Yeo W; Yue WM
Spine J; 2016 Feb; 16(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 26515392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
Cui GY; Han XG; Wei Y; Liu YJ; He D; Sun YQ; Liu B; Tian W
Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 34516712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison between open and mini-open approaches with two years follow-up.
Zairi F; Arikat A; Allaoui M; Assaker R
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2013 May; 74(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 23307308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2.
Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Zheng WJ; Liu J
Eur Spine J; 2010 Oct; 19(10):1780-4. PubMed ID: 20411281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Clinical outcomes of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bilateral tubular channels].
Zeng ZL; Jia L; Yu Y; Xu W; Hu X; Zhan XH; Jia YW; Wang JJ; Cheng LM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 55(4):279-284. PubMed ID: 28355766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Complete anatomic reduction and monosegmental fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis of Grade II and higher: use of the minimally invasive "rocking" technique.
Rajakumar DV; Hari A; Krishna M; Sharma A; Reddy M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E12. PubMed ID: 28760034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Surgical Outcomes for Minimally Invasive vs Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Khan NR; Clark AJ; Lee SL; Venable GT; Rossi NB; Foley KT
Neurosurgery; 2015 Dec; 77(6):847-74; discussion 874. PubMed ID: 26214320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Is Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Superior to Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis? A Retrospective Study.
Yin J; Jiang X; Xu N; Nong L; Jiang Y
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2024 Jan; 85(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 36481999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Revisions for screw malposition and clinical outcomes after robot-guided lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.
Schröder ML; Staartjes VE
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 May; 42(5):E12. PubMed ID: 28463610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective, controlled observational study of short-term outcome.
Hartmann S; Lang A; Lener S; Abramovic A; Grassner L; Thomé C
Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Oct; 45(5):3417-3426. PubMed ID: 36064875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Patient-Reported Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease: A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study.
Jover-Mendiola AD; Lopez-Prats FA; Lizaur-Utrilla A; Vizcaya-Moreno MF
Clin Orthop Surg; 2023 Apr; 15(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 37008969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Instrumented Minimally Invasive Spinal-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF): Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up With Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes.
Kim JS; Jung B; Lee SH
Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Jul; 31(6):E302-E309. PubMed ID: 23027364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Minimally Invasive Versus Traditional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis Grades 1 and 2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Qin R; Liu B; Zhou P; Yao Y; Hao J; Yang K; Xu TL; Zhang F; Chen X
World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():180-189. PubMed ID: 30414524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.
Kang MS; You KH; Choi JY; Heo DH; Chung HJ; Park HJ
Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2066-2077. PubMed ID: 34171465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Posterolateral Fusion Alone in the Treatment of Grade 1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
Tang AR; Chanbour H; Steinle AM; Jonzzon S; Roth SG; Gardocki RJ; Stephens BF; Abtahi AM; Zuckerman SL
Neurosurgery; 2023 Jul; 93(1):186-197. PubMed ID: 36848669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Correlation of return to work with patient satisfaction after surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: an analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
DiGiorgio AM; Mummaneni PV; Park P; Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Foley KT; Glassman SD; Shaffrey CI; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Wang MY; Fu KM; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Slotkin JR
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 May; 48(5):E5. PubMed ID: 32357321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Minimally invasive versus open Transforaminal lumbar Interbody fusion in obese patients: a meta-analysis.
Xie Q; Zhang J; Lu F; Wu H; Chen Z; Jian F
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Jan; 19(1):15. PubMed ID: 29343248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Cost-effectiveness of circumferential fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: propensity-matched comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with anterior-posterior fusion.
Jazini E; Gum JL; Glassman SD; Crawford CH; Djurasovic M; Owens RK; Dimar JR; McGraw KE; Carreon LY
Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1969-1973. PubMed ID: 29705337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
