BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32410047)

  • 21. Evaluation of the factors affecting the maximum standardized uptake value of metastatic lymph nodes in different histological types of non-small cell lung cancer on PET-CT.
    Wang Y; Ma S; Dong M; Yao Y; Liu K; Zhou J
    BMC Pulm Med; 2015 Mar; 15():20. PubMed ID: 25880540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Normal mediastinal lymph nodes: number and size according to American Thoracic Society mapping.
    Glazer GM; Gross BH; Quint LE; Francis IR; Bookstein FL; Orringer MB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Feb; 144(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 3871268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Agreement of Mediastinal Lymph Node Size Between Computed Tomography and Endobronchial Ultrasonography: A Study of 617 Patients.
    Dhooria S; Agarwal R; Aggarwal AN; Gupta N; Gupta D; Behera D
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 99(6):1894-8. PubMed ID: 25912747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Upper abdominal lymph nodes: criteria for normal size determined with CT.
    Dorfman RE; Alpern MB; Gross BH; Sandler MA
    Radiology; 1991 Aug; 180(2):319-22. PubMed ID: 2068292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The number and size of normal mediastinal lymph nodes: a postmortem study.
    Kiyono K; Sone S; Sakai F; Imai Y; Watanabe T; Izuno I; Oguchi M; Kawai T; Shigematsu H; Watanabe M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Apr; 150(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 3258087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Retroperitoneal and Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Children: What Is Normal?
    Karmazyn B; Supakul N; Lehnert SJ; Shan M; Vik TA; Jennings SG; Billmire DF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jun; 214(6):1384-1388. PubMed ID: 32228324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Unilateral, multicentric Warthin's tumor mimicking a tumor metastatic to a lymph node. A case report.
    Chae SW; Sohn JH; Shin HS; Choi JJ; Kim YB
    Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 15085758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prediction of lateral lymph node metastasis in lower rectal cancer: analysis of paraffin-embedded sections.
    Ishida H; Hatano S; Ishiguro T; Kumamoto K; Ishibashi K; Haga N
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jun; 42(6):485-90. PubMed ID: 22457325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Difficulty of predicting lymph node metastasis on CT in patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
    Ushigome H; Fukunaga Y; Nagasaki T; Akiyoshi T; Konishi T; Fujimoto Y; Nagayama S; Ueno M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211675. PubMed ID: 30742649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of dual energy spectral CT in differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: Initial experience.
    Liu H; Yan F; Pan Z; Lin X; Luo X; Shi C; Chen X; Wang B; Zhang H
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Feb; 84(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 25497234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Risk factor analysis of mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer patients and the strategy of mediastinoscopy prior to surgery].
    Wang X; Zheng L; Zhang SY; Xie ZM; Yu H; Su XD; Wang JY; Huang ZF; Yang MT; Rong TH
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 31(6):456-9. PubMed ID: 19950559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of spectral CT imaging in evaluating lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancers: initial findings.
    Zhou Z; Liu Y; Meng K; Guan W; He J; Liu S; Zhou Z
    Acta Radiol; 2019 Apr; 60(4):415-424. PubMed ID: 29979106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Normal radiological lymph node appearance in the thorax.
    Hansen T; Nilsson M; Lindholm D; Sundström J; Hedberg J
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Dec; 32(10):1-6. PubMed ID: 30561570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improving CT detection sensitivity for nodal metastases in oesophageal cancer with combination of smaller size and lymph node axial ratio.
    Liu J; Wang Z; Shao H; Qu D; Liu J; Yao L
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):188-195. PubMed ID: 28677059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) in differentiating between benign and metastatic lymph nodes in cases of cholangiocarcinoma.
    Promsorn J; Soontrapa W; Somsap K; Chamadol N; Limpawattana P; Harisinghani M
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 30151713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of pelvic lymph node metastasis in bladder cancer.
    Li Y; Diao F; Shi S; Li K; Zhu W; Wu S; Lin T
    Chin J Cancer; 2018 Jan; 37(1):3. PubMed ID: 29370848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preoperative lymph node status on computed tomography influences the survival of pT1b, T2 and T3 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Sugawara K; Yamashita H; Uemura Y; Yagi K; Nishida M; Aikou S; Nomura S; Seto Y
    Surg Today; 2019 May; 49(5):378-386. PubMed ID: 30467719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Magnetic resonance appearance of normal inguinal nodes.
    Grey AC; Carrington BM; Hulse PA; Swindell R; Yates W
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Feb; 55(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 10657158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nonpalpable supraclavicular lymph nodes in lung cancer patients: preoperative characterization with 18F-FDG PET/CT.
    Sung YM; Lee KS; Kim BT; Kim S; Kwon OJ; Choi JY; Yang SO
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jan; 190(1):246-52. PubMed ID: 18094319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prognosis and staging of parotid lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An analysis in 10,126 patients.
    Zhang Y; Zhang ZC; Li WF; Liu X; Liu Q; Ma J
    Oral Oncol; 2019 Aug; 95():150-156. PubMed ID: 31345383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.