BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32410374)

  • 1. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer: A retrospective, single-center study.
    Aiko K; Kanno K; Yanai S; Masuda S; Yasui M; Ichikawa F; Teishikata Y; Shirane T; Yoshino Y; Sakate S; Sawada M; Shirane A; Ota Y; Andou M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1157-1164. PubMed ID: 32410374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A single-center study.
    Oyama K; Kanno K; Kojima R; Shirane A; Yanai S; Ota Y; Andou M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Feb; 45(2):405-411. PubMed ID: 30426602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging: further improvement of perioperative outcomes.
    Casarin J; Multinu F; Tortorella L; Cappuccio S; Weaver AL; Ghezzi F; Cilby W; Kumar A; Langstraat C; Glaser G; Mariani A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 31780567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].
    Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations].
    Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R
    Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Para-aortic lymph node surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: comparison between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy.
    Loverix L; Salihi RR; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Concin N; Han S; van Gorp T; Vergote I
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Apr; 30(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 32079714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of endometrial carcinoma.
    Pakish J; Soliman PT; Frumovitz M; Westin SN; Schmeler KM; Reis RD; Munsell MF; Ramirez PT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Feb; 132(2):366-71. PubMed ID: 24361579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
    Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of single-port laparoscopy, standard laparoscopy, and robotic surgery in patients with endometrial cancer.
    Escobar PF; Frumovitz M; Soliman PT; Frasure HE; Fader AN; Schmeler KM; Ramirez PT
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1583-8. PubMed ID: 22083622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioperative complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery using three robotic arms at a single institution.
    Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim YT
    Yonsei Med J; 2015 Mar; 56(2):474-81. PubMed ID: 25683998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Telelap ALF-X vs Standard Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Gueli Alletti S; Rossitto C; Cianci S; Restaino S; Costantini B; Fanfani F; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Scambia G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 26602025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer.
    Lee HJ; Lee YH; Chong GO; Hong DG; Lee YS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Mar; 44(3):547-555. PubMed ID: 29239059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning curve in concurrent application of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.
    Torng PL; Pan SP; Hwang JS; Shih HJ; Chen CL
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 56(6):781-787. PubMed ID: 29241920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
    Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical complications comparing extraperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic staging in early stage ovarian and endometrial cancer.
    Díaz-Feijoo B; Bebia V; Hernández A; Gilabert-Estalles J; Franco-Camps S; de la Torre J; Segrist J; Chipirliu A; Cabrera S; Pérez-Benavente A; Gil-Moreno A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 160(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 33160695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
    Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: A randomised controlled trial.
    Salehi S; Åvall-Lundqvist E; Legerstam B; Carlson JW; Falconer H
    Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 79():81-89. PubMed ID: 28463759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.