209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32410378)
1. Predictors of patient preference for either whole body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) or CT/ PET-CT for staging colorectal or lung cancer.
Miles A; Evans RE; Halligan S; Beare S; Bridgewater J; Goh V; Janes SM; Navani N; Oliver A; Morton A; Morris S; Rockall A; Taylor SA;
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2020 Aug; 64(4):537-545. PubMed ID: 32410378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient preferences for whole-body MRI or conventional staging pathways in lung and colorectal cancer: a discrete choice experiment.
Miles A; Taylor SA; Evans REC; Halligan S; Beare S; Bridgewater J; Goh V; Janes S; Navani N; Oliver A; Morton A; Rockall A; Clarke CS; Morris S;
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul; 29(7):3889-3900. PubMed ID: 30937589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceived patient burden and acceptability of whole body MRI for staging lung and colorectal cancer; comparison with standard staging investigations.
Evans RE; Taylor SA; Beare S; Halligan S; Morton A; Oliver A; Rockall A; Miles A
Br J Radiol; 2018 Jun; 91(1086):20170731. PubMed ID: 29528257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Streamlining staging of lung and colorectal cancer with whole body MRI; study protocols for two multicentre, non-randomised, single-arm, prospective diagnostic accuracy studies (Streamline C and Streamline L).
Taylor SA; Mallett S; Miles A; Beare S; Bhatnagar G; Bridgewater J; Glynne-Jones R; Goh V; Groves AM; Janes SM; Koh DM; Morris S; Morton A; Navani N; Oliver A; Padhani AR; Punwani S; Rockall AG; Halligan S
BMC Cancer; 2017 May; 17(1):299. PubMed ID: 28464835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI diagnostic performance in M staging for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Machado Medeiros T; Altmayer S; Watte G; Zanon M; Basso Dias A; Henz Concatto N; Hoefel Paes J; Mattiello R; de Souza Santos F; Mohammed TL; Verma N; Hochhegger B
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3641-3649. PubMed ID: 32125513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient deprivation and perceived scan burden negatively impact the quality of whole-body MRI.
Evans REC; Taylor SA; Kalasthry J; Sakai NS; Miles A;
Clin Radiol; 2020 Apr; 75(4):308-315. PubMed ID: 31836179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Staging of colon cancer: whole-body MRI vs. whole-body PET-CT--initial clinical experience.
Squillaci E; Manenti G; Mancino S; Cicciò C; Calabria F; Danieli R; Schillaci O; Simonetti G
Abdom Imaging; 2008; 33(6):676-88. PubMed ID: 18373114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient experience and perceived acceptability of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal and lung cancer compared with current staging scans: a qualitative study.
Evans R; Taylor S; Janes S; Halligan S; Morton A; Navani N; Oliver A; Rockall A; Teague J; Miles A;
BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016391. PubMed ID: 28882915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Whole-body MRI compared with standard pathways for staging metastatic disease in lung and colorectal cancer: the Streamline diagnostic accuracy studies.
Taylor SA; Mallett S; Miles A; Morris S; Quinn L; Clarke CS; Beare S; Bridgewater J; Goh V; Janes S; Koh DM; Morton A; Navani N; Oliver A; Padhani A; Punwani S; Rockall A; Halligan S
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Dec; 23(66):1-270. PubMed ID: 31855148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of whole-body MRI including diffusion-weighted sequences in the initial staging of breast cancer patients at high risk of metastases in comparison with PET-CT: a prospective cohort study.
Hottat NA; Badr DA; Ben Ghanem M; Besse-Hammer T; Lecomte SM; Vansteelandt C; Lecomte SL; Khaled C; De Grove V; Salem Wehbe G; Cannie MM; Jani JC
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):165-178. PubMed ID: 37555959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance image tumor staging with the use of parallel imaging versus dual-modality positron emission tomography-computed tomography: experience on a 32-channel system.
Schmidt GP; Baur-Melnyk A; Herzog P; Schmid R; Tiling R; Schmidt M; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2005 Dec; 40(12):743-53. PubMed ID: 16304476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI versus standard imaging pathways for metastatic disease in newly diagnosed non-small-cell lung cancer: the prospective Streamline L trial.
Taylor SA; Mallett S; Ball S; Beare S; Bhatnagar G; Bhowmik A; Boavida P; Bridgewater J; Clarke CS; Duggan M; Ellis S; Glynne-Jones R; Goh V; Groves AM; Hameeduddin A; Janes SM; Johnston EW; Koh DM; Lock S; Miles A; Morris S; Morton A; Navani N; Oliver A; O'Shaughnessy T; Padhani AR; Prezzi D; Punwani S; Quinn L; Rafiee H; Reczko K; Rockall AG; Russell P; Sidhu HS; Strickland N; Tarver K; Teague J; Halligan S;
Lancet Respir Med; 2019 Jun; 7(6):523-532. PubMed ID: 31080129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coregistered whole body magnetic resonance imaging-positron emission tomography (MRI-PET) versus PET-computed tomography plus brain MRI in staging resectable lung cancer: comparisons of clinical effectiveness in a randomized trial.
Yi CA; Lee KS; Lee HY; Kim S; Kwon OJ; Kim H; Choi JY; Kim BT; Hwang HS; Shim YM
Cancer; 2013 May; 119(10):1784-91. PubMed ID: 23423920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic Performance of Whole-Body Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Compared to PET-CT Plus Brain MRI in Staging Clinically Resectable Lung Cancer.
Usuda K; Sagawa M; Maeda S; Motono N; Tanaka M; Machida Y; Matoba TM; Watanabe N; Tonami H; Ueda Y; Uramoto H
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(6):2775-80. PubMed ID: 27356689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient centered radiology: investigating 3 Tesla whole body MRI acceptance in cancer patients.
Rossi A; Prochowski Iamurri A; Diano D; Oboldi D; Sintuzzi E; Maurizio L; Andalò A; Cavallucci M; Ferroni F; Amadori E; Barone D; Petralia G
Radiol Med; 2023 Aug; 128(8):960-969. PubMed ID: 37395842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiparametric whole-body 3.0-T MRI in newly diagnosed intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement for nodal and metastatic staging.
Johnston EW; Latifoltojar A; Sidhu HS; Ramachandran N; Sokolska M; Bainbridge A; Moore C; Ahmed HU; Punwani S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jun; 29(6):3159-3169. PubMed ID: 30519933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colorectal cancer staging: comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MR.
Catalano OA; Coutinho AM; Sahani DV; Vangel MG; Gee MS; Hahn PF; Witzel T; Soricelli A; Salvatore M; Catana C; Mahmood U; Rosen BR; Gervais D
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Apr; 42(4):1141-1151. PubMed ID: 27891551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Whole-body MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T compared with FDG-PET-CT for the detection of tumour recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer.
Schmidt GP; Baur-Melnyk A; Haug A; Utzschneider S; Becker CR; Tiling R; Reiser MF; Hermann KA
Eur Radiol; 2009 Jun; 19(6):1366-78. PubMed ID: 19190917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Whole-body MRI, FDG-PET/CT, and bone marrow biopsy, for the assessment of bone marrow involvement in patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma.
Albano D; Patti C; Lagalla R; Midiri M; Galia M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Apr; 45(4):1082-1089. PubMed ID: 27603267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of hybrid FDG PET/MRI compared with PET/CT in colorectal cancer staging and restaging: a pilot study.
Paspulati RM; Partovi S; Herrmann KA; Krishnamurthi S; Delaney CP; Nguyen NC
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Aug; 40(6):1415-25. PubMed ID: 26112492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
