These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3241118)

  • 1. Comparison of keyboard, light pen and voice recognition as methods of data input.
    Murchie CJ; Kenny GN
    Int J Clin Monit Comput; 1988; 5(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 3241118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study of mobile electronic data entry systems for clinical trials data collection.
    Cole E; Pisano ED; Clary GJ; Zeng D; Koomen M; Kuzmiak CM; Seo BK; Lee Y; Pavic D
    Int J Med Inform; 2006; 75(10-11):722-9. PubMed ID: 16386460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Smartphone Text Input Method Performance, Usability, and Preference With Younger and Older Adults.
    Smith AL; Chaparro BS
    Hum Factors; 2015 Sep; 57(6):1015-28. PubMed ID: 25850116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A basic study on application of voice recognition input to an electronic nursing record system -evaluation of the function as an input interface-.
    Marukami T; Tani S; Matsuda A; Takemoto K; Shindo A; Inada H
    J Med Syst; 2012 Jun; 36(3):1053-8. PubMed ID: 20827571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New user interfaces.
    Lun KC
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1995 Apr; 39(1):147-50. PubMed ID: 7601528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental comparisons of data entry by automated speech recognition, keyboard, and mouse.
    Mitchard H; Winkles J
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(2):198-209. PubMed ID: 12452268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of the use of hand-held computers for bedside nursing care.
    Young PM; Leung RM; Ho LM; McGhee SM
    Int J Med Inform; 2001 Jul; 62(2-3):189-93. PubMed ID: 11470622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of Voice Recognition Program and Traditional Keyboard Charting for Nurse Documentation.
    Mayer L; Xu D; Edwards N; Bokhart G
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2021 Aug; 40(2):90-94. PubMed ID: 34347642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Text entry on handheld computers by older users.
    Wright P; Bartram C; Rogers N; Emslie H; Evans J; Wilson B; Belt S
    Ergonomics; 2000 Jun; 43(6):702-16. PubMed ID: 10902881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Voice recognition in clinical medicine: process versus technology.
    Bergeron BP
    J Med Pract Manage; 2001; 16(4):213-5. PubMed ID: 11317583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An investigation into the use of a voice operated data input system.
    Hawley GM; Hamilton FA; Worthington HV
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1993 Feb; 21(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 8432100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of dynamic keyboard and word-prediction systems on text input speed in persons with functional tetraplegia.
    Pouplin S; Robertson J; Antoine JY; Blanchet A; Kahloun JL; Volle P; Bouteille J; Lofaso F; Bensmail D
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(3):467-79. PubMed ID: 25019668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Address entry while driving: speech recognition versus a touch-screen keyboard.
    Tsimhoni O; Smith D; Green P
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):600-10. PubMed ID: 15709323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A voice-detecting sensor and a scanning keyboard emulator to support word writing by two boys with extensive motor disabilities.
    Lancioni GE; Singh NN; O'Reilly MF; Sigafoos J; Green V; Chiapparino C; Stasolla F; Oliva D
    Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 18417320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human-computer interaction in radiotherapy target volume delineation: a prospective, multi-institutional comparison of user input devices.
    Multi-Institutional Target Delineation in Oncology Group
    J Digit Imaging; 2011 Oct; 24(5):794-803. PubMed ID: 20978922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating a spoken dialogue system for recording clinical observations during an endoscopic examination.
    Barker DJ; van Schaik P; Simpson DS; Corbett WA
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2003 Jun; 28(2):85-97. PubMed ID: 14692586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A computer-aided digital audio recording and encoding system for improving the encoding of verbal reports.
    Crutcher RJ
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2003 May; 35(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 12834083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pen-based computing: is it good for health?
    Lun KC
    Technol Health Care; 1994 Jan; 2(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 25273804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Posture and discomfort assessment in computer users while using touch screen device as compared with mouse-keyboard and touch pad-keyboard.
    Kargar N; Choobineh AR; Razeghi M; Keshavarzi S; Meftahi N
    Work; 2018; 59(3):341-349. PubMed ID: 29630576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SCUT: clinical data organization for physicians using pen computers.
    Wormuth DW
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1992; ():845-6. PubMed ID: 1483012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.