These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

509 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32412387)

  • 1. The cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy or atezolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma in the United States.
    Slater RL; Lai Y; Zhong Y; Li H; Meng Y; Moreno BH; Godwin JL; Frenkl T; Sonpavde GP; Mamtani R
    J Med Econ; 2020 Sep; 23(9):967-977. PubMed ID: 32412387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab as Second-line Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in Sweden.
    Srivastava T; Prabhu VS; Li H; Xu R; Zarabi N; Zhong Y; Pellissier JM; Perini RF; de Wit R; Mamtani R
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 3(5):663-670. PubMed ID: 31412001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pembrolizumab for Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
    Gallacher D; Armoiry X; Auguste P; Court R; Mantopoulos T; Patterson J; De Santis M; Cresswell J; Mistry H
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Jan; 37(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 30030817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
    Aziz MIA; Tan LE; Tan WHG; Toh CK; Loke LPY; Pearce F; Ng K
    J Med Econ; 2020 Sep; 23(9):952-960. PubMed ID: 32462958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for Patients with Advanced, Unresectable, or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Ineligible for Cisplatin-based Therapy.
    Patterson K; Prabhu V; Xu R; Li H; Meng Y; Zarabi N; Zhong Y; Batteson R; Pellissier J; Keefe S; Grivas P; de Wit R
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 2(5):565-571. PubMed ID: 31412011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC that expresses high levels of PD-L1 in Switzerland.
    Bhadhuri A; Insinga R; Guggisberg P; Panje C; Schwenkglenks M
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2019 Dec; 149():w20170. PubMed ID: 31880807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of second-line atezolizumab in Canada for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    Ondhia U; Conter HJ; Owen S; Zhou A; Nam J; Singh S; Abdulla A; Chu P; Felizzi F; Paracha N; Sangha R
    J Med Econ; 2019 Jul; 22(7):625-637. PubMed ID: 30836031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in the 1st line treatment of non-squamous NSCLC in the US.
    Insinga RP; Vanness DJ; Feliciano JL; Vandormael K; Traore S; Burke T
    J Med Econ; 2018 Dec; 21(12):1191-1205. PubMed ID: 30188231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Combination Therapy for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.
    Criss SD; Mooradian MJ; Watson TR; Gainor JF; Reynolds KL; Kong CY
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Sep; 2(9):e1911952. PubMed ID: 31553470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.
    Liu Q; Tan C; Yi L; Wan X; Peng L; Li J; Luo X; Zeng X
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0258605. PubMed ID: 34780478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab in Second-line Advanced Bladder Cancer.
    Sarfaty M; Hall PS; Chan KKW; Virik K; Leshno M; Gordon N; Moore A; Neiman V; Rosenbaum E; Goldstein DA
    Eur Urol; 2018 Jul; 74(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 29576265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score 1% or greater.
    She L; Hu H; Liao M; Xia X; Shi Y; Yao L; Ding D; Zhu Y; Zeng S; Shen L; Huang J; Carbone DP
    Lung Cancer; 2019 Dec; 138():88-94. PubMed ID: 31655368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pembrolizumab for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Where Cisplatin is Unsuitable: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
    Ren S; Squires H; Hock E; Kaltenthaler E; Rawdin A; Alifrangis C
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Sep; 37(9):1073-1080. PubMed ID: 30547369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-Effectiveness of Cemiplimab Versus Standard of Care in the United States for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression ≥50.
    Kuznik A; Smare C; Chen CI; Venkatachalam M; Keeping S; Atsou K; Xu Y; Wilson F; Guyot P; Chan K; Glowienka E; Konidaris G
    Value Health; 2022 Feb; 25(2):203-214. PubMed ID: 35094793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France.
    Chouaid C; Bensimon L; Clay E; Millier A; Levy-Bachelot L; Huang M; Levy P
    Lung Cancer; 2019 Jan; 127():44-52. PubMed ID: 30642550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cemiplimab vs pembrolizumab for treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.
    Paul E; Konidaris G; Cope S; Chen CI; Keeping S; Xu Y; Atsou K; Ayers D; Guyot P; Sasane M; Mojebi A; Kuznik A
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2021 Nov; 27(11):1513-1525. PubMed ID: 34351214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for the adjuvant treatment of resected high-risk stage III melanoma in the United States.
    Bensimon AG; Zhou ZY; Jenkins M; Song Y; Gao W; Signorovitch J; Krepler C; Liu FX; Wang J; Aguiar-Ibáñez R
    J Med Econ; 2019 Oct; 22(10):981-993. PubMed ID: 31012765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimated Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Cobimetinib and Vemurafenib for Treatment of BRAF V600 Variation Metastatic Melanoma.
    Cai C; Yunusa I; Tarhini A
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132262. PubMed ID: 34762112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the Value of Cemiplimab for Adults With Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Konidaris G; Paul E; Kuznik A; Keeping S; Chen CI; Sasane M; Xu Y; Atsou K; Ayers D; Ruiz ES; Khushalani NI; Cope S
    Value Health; 2021 Mar; 24(3):377-387. PubMed ID: 33641772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Zhang X; Wang J; Shi J; Jia X; Dang S; Wang W
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e214846. PubMed ID: 33825837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.