These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32413731)

  • 1. The effects of a model statement on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
    Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jun; 207():103080. PubMed ID: 32413731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of sketching while narrating on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
    Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S; Burkhardt J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Feb; 213():103236. PubMed ID: 33360343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the model statement to elicit information and cues to deceit in interpreter-based interviews.
    Vrij A; Leal S; Mann S; Dalton G; Jo E; Shaboltas A; Khaleeva M; Granskaya J; Houston K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():44-53. PubMed ID: 28477454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cues to deception: can complications, common knowledge details, and self-handicapping strategies discriminate between truths, embedded lies and outright lies in an Italian-speaking sample?
    Caso L; Cavagnis L; Vrij A; Palena N
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1128194. PubMed ID: 37179853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Insurance based lie detection: Enhancing the verifiability approach with a model statement component.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Lafferty M; Nahari G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():1-8. PubMed ID: 28088655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proportion of complications in interpreter-absent and interpreter-present interviews.
    Vrij A; Leal S
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(1):155-164. PubMed ID: 32284786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works.
    Hartwig M; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Kronkvist O
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):603-19. PubMed ID: 16977348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amplifying deceivers' flawed metacognition: Encouraging disclosures after delays with a model statement.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Hope L; Mann S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Sep; 200():102935. PubMed ID: 31715443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Model Sketch for Enhancing Lie Detection and Eliciting Information.
    Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S; Mann S; Burkhardt J
    Brain Sci; 2022 Sep; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 36138916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unanticipated questions can yield unanticipated outcomes in investigative interviews.
    Parkhouse T; Ormerod TC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208751. PubMed ID: 30532180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reliability of lie detection performance.
    Leach AM; Lindsay RC; Koehler R; Beaudry JL; Bala NC; Lee K; Talwar V
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 18594955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the efficacy of baselining in deception detection: A comparative analysis of the reality interview and structured interview.
    Bogaard G; van de Bovekamp AM; Colwell K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Feb; 242():104112. PubMed ID: 38070326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting false intentions using unanticipated questions.
    Bogaard G; van der Mark J; Meijer EH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226257. PubMed ID: 31825997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
    Hartwig M; Bond CF
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):643-59. PubMed ID: 21707129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unraveling the Misconception About Deception and Nervous Behavior.
    Vrij A; Fisher RP
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1377. PubMed ID: 32625154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deception detection: State of the art and future prospects.
    Masip J
    Psicothema; 2017 May; 29(2):149-159. PubMed ID: 28438235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting.
    Ströfer S; Ufkes EG; Noordzij ML; Giebels E
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2016 Sep; 41(3):349-62. PubMed ID: 27193132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eliciting cues to false intent: a new application of strategic interviewing.
    Clemens F; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):512-22. PubMed ID: 21170575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategic Interviewing to Detect Deception: Cues to Deception across Repeated Interviews.
    Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I; Martínez C; Herrero C; Ibabe I
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1702. PubMed ID: 27847493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.