309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32413883)
1. TriB-RT: Simultaneous optimization of photon, electron and proton beams.
Kueng R; Mueller S; Loebner HA; Frei D; Volken W; Aebersold DM; Stampanoni MFM; Fix MK; Manser P
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 66(4):045006. PubMed ID: 32413883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A GPU-accelerated and Monte Carlo-based intensity modulated proton therapy optimization system.
Ma J; Beltran C; Seum Wan Chan Tseung H; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121707. PubMed ID: 25471954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric advantages of IMPT over IMRT for laser-accelerated proton beams.
Luo W; Li J; Fourkal E; Fan J; Xu X; Chen Z; Jin L; Price R; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7151-66. PubMed ID: 19033641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beamlet based direct aperture optimization for MERT using a photon MLC.
Henzen D; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Neuenschwander H; Born EJ; Joosten A; Lössl K; Aebersold DM; Chatelain C; Stampanoni MF; Fix MK
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121711. PubMed ID: 25471958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.
de Jong BA; Battinelli C; Free J; Wagenaar D; Engwall E; Janssens G; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW; Both S
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 36373893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robust optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy with soft spot sensitivity regularization.
Gu W; Ruan D; O'Connor D; Zou W; Dong L; Tsai MY; Jia X; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1408-1425. PubMed ID: 30570164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment planning comparison for head and neck cancer between photon, proton, and combined proton-photon therapy - From a fixed beam line to an arc.
Amstutz F; Krcek R; Bachtiary B; Weber DC; Lomax AJ; Unkelbach J; Zhang Y
Radiother Oncol; 2024 Jan; 190():109973. PubMed ID: 37913953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinically Applicable Monte Carlo-based Biological Dose Optimization for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers With Spot-Scanning Proton Therapy.
Wan Chan Tseung HS; Ma J; Kreofsky CR; Ma DJ; Beltran C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Aug; 95(5):1535-1543. PubMed ID: 27325476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In silico comparison of the dosimetric impacts of a greater omentum spacer for abdominal and pelvic tumors in carbon-ion, proton and photon radiotherapy.
Yamada M; Sato H; Ieko Y; Miyasaka Y; Kanai T; Yano N; Ono T; Akamatsu H; Harada M; Ichikawa M; Teranishi Y; Kikuchi Y; Nemoto K
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Nov; 14(1):207. PubMed ID: 31752932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.
Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of dose perturbations for metal stent in photon and proton radiotherapy plans for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Lee B; Cho S; Park HC; Kang SW; Kim JS; Chung JB
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Jul; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 35842636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fraction optimization for hybrid proton-photon treatment planning.
Li W; Zhang W; Lin Y; Chen RC; Gao H
Med Phys; 2023 Jun; 50(6):3311-3323. PubMed ID: 36786202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simultaneous optimization of photons and electrons for mixed beam radiotherapy.
Mueller S; Fix MK; Joosten A; Henzen D; Frei D; Volken W; Kueng R; Aebersold DM; Stampanoni MFM; Manser P
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(14):5840-5860. PubMed ID: 28467321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Forward treatment planning for modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT) employing Monte Carlo methods.
Henzen D; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Neuenschwander H; Born EJ; Lössl K; Aebersold DM; Stampanoni MF; Fix MK
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031712. PubMed ID: 24593716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-scenario based robust intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans can account for set-up errors more effectively in terms of normal tissue sparing than planning target volume (PTV) based intensity-modulated photon plans in the head and neck region.
Stuschke M; Kaiser A; Abu Jawad J; Pöttgen C; Levegrün S; Farr J
Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jun; 8():145. PubMed ID: 23773560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
