174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32415110)
1. Integrating molecular markers into metabolic models improves genomic selection for Arabidopsis growth.
Tong H; Küken A; Nikoloski Z
Nat Commun; 2020 May; 11(1):2410. PubMed ID: 32415110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting plasticity of rosette growth and metabolic fluxes in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Tong H; Laitinen RAE; Nikoloski Z
New Phytol; 2023 Oct; 240(1):426-438. PubMed ID: 37507350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of the carbon and nitrogen supply on relationships and connectivity between metabolism and biomass in a broad panel of Arabidopsis accessions.
Sulpice R; Nikoloski Z; Tschoep H; Antonio C; Kleessen S; Larhlimi A; Selbig J; Ishihara H; Gibon Y; Fernie AR; Stitt M
Plant Physiol; 2013 May; 162(1):347-63. PubMed ID: 23515278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Machine learning approaches for crop improvement: Leveraging phenotypic and genotypic big data.
Tong H; Nikoloski Z
J Plant Physiol; 2021 Feb; 257():153354. PubMed ID: 33385619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic relationships between spring emergence, canopy phenology, and biomass yield increase the accuracy of genomic prediction in Miscanthus.
Davey CL; Robson P; Hawkins S; Farrar K; Clifton-Brown JC; Donnison IS; Slavov GT
J Exp Bot; 2017 Nov; 68(18):5093-5102. PubMed ID: 29040628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Methods, Models, and Perspectives.
Crossa J; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Cuevas J; Montesinos-López O; Jarquín D; de Los Campos G; Burgueño J; González-Camacho JM; Pérez-Elizalde S; Beyene Y; Dreisigacker S; Singh R; Zhang X; Gowda M; Roorkiwal M; Rutkoski J; Varshney RK
Trends Plant Sci; 2017 Nov; 22(11):961-975. PubMed ID: 28965742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting biomass of rice with intermediate traits: Modeling method combining crop growth models and genomic prediction models.
Toda Y; Wakatsuki H; Aoike T; Kajiya-Kanegae H; Yamasaki M; Yoshioka T; Ebana K; Hayashi T; Nakagawa H; Hasegawa T; Iwata H
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233951. PubMed ID: 32559220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials.
Oakey H; Cullis B; Thompson R; Comadran J; Halpin C; Waugh R
G3 (Bethesda); 2016 May; 6(5):1313-26. PubMed ID: 26976443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of genomic selection for alfalfa biomass yield in different reference populations.
Annicchiarico P; Nazzicari N; Li X; Wei Y; Pecetti L; Brummer EC
BMC Genomics; 2015 Dec; 16():1020. PubMed ID: 26626170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prior Biological Knowledge Improves Genomic Prediction of Growth-Related Traits in
Farooq M; van Dijk ADJ; Nijveen H; Aarts MGM; Kruijer W; Nguyen TP; Mansoor S; de Ridder D
Front Genet; 2020; 11():609117. PubMed ID: 33552126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accurate genomic prediction of Coffea canephora in multiple environments using whole-genome statistical models.
Ferrão LFV; Ferrão RG; Ferrão MAG; Fonseca A; Carbonetto P; Stephens M; Garcia AAF
Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Mar; 122(3):261-275. PubMed ID: 29941997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of multiple traits genomic prediction, genotype by environment interactions and spatial effect to improve prediction accuracy in yield data.
Tsai HY; Cericola F; Edriss V; Andersen JR; Orabi J; Jensen JD; Jahoor A; Janss L; Jensen J
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0232665. PubMed ID: 32401769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional Genomic Selection in Crop Breeding.
Li Y
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2107():189-198. PubMed ID: 31893448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomics: a potential panacea for the perennial problem.
McClure KA; Sawler J; Gardner KM; Money D; Myles S
Am J Bot; 2014 Oct; 101(10):1780-90. PubMed ID: 25326620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marker-based estimation of heritability in immortal populations.
Kruijer W; Boer MP; Malosetti M; Flood PJ; Engel B; Kooke R; Keurentjes JJ; van Eeuwijk FA
Genetics; 2015 Feb; 199(2):379-98. PubMed ID: 25527288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genomic approaches to selection in outcrossing perennials: focus on essential oil crops.
Kainer D; Lanfear R; Foley WJ; Külheim C
Theor Appl Genet; 2015 Dec; 128(12):2351-65. PubMed ID: 26239409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving accuracies of genomic predictions for drought tolerance in maize by joint modeling of additive and dominance effects in multi-environment trials.
Dias KODG; Gezan SA; Guimarães CT; Nazarian A; da Costa E Silva L; Parentoni SN; de Oliveira Guimarães PE; de Oliveira Anoni C; Pádua JMV; de Oliveira Pinto M; Noda RW; Ribeiro CAG; de Magalhães JV; Garcia AAF; de Souza JC; Guimarães LJM; Pastina MM
Heredity (Edinb); 2018 Jul; 121(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 29472694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrating Crop Growth Models with Whole Genome Prediction through Approximate Bayesian Computation.
Technow F; Messina CD; Totir LR; Cooper M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130855. PubMed ID: 26121133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospects of Genomic Prediction in the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection: Historical Data Creates Robust Models for Enhancing Selection of Accessions.
Jarquin D; Specht J; Lorenz A
G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Aug; 6(8):2329-41. PubMed ID: 27247288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genomic Prediction Accounting for Genotype by Environment Interaction Offers an Effective Framework for Breeding Simultaneously for Adaptation to an Abiotic Stress and Performance Under Normal Cropping Conditions in Rice.
Ben Hassen M; Bartholomé J; Valè G; Cao TV; Ahmadi N
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Jul; 8(7):2319-2332. PubMed ID: 29743189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
