These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32415584)

  • 1. Diagnostic performance of conventional and advanced imaging modalities for assessing newly diagnosed cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Woo S; Atun R; Ward ZJ; Scott AM; Hricak H; Vargas HA
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5560-5577. PubMed ID: 32415584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comprehensive Comparison of CT, MRI, Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/CT, and Diffusion Weighted Imaging-MRI for Detecting the Lymph Nodes Metastases in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on 67 Studies.
    Liu B; Gao S; Li S
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 28183074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic performance of MR imaging in evaluating prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Xiao M; Yan B; Li Y; Lu J; Qiang J
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1405-1418. PubMed ID: 31776741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines).
    Fischerová D; Cibula D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 31213057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis.
    Choi HJ; Ju W; Myung SK; Kim Y
    Cancer Sci; 2010 Jun; 101(6):1471-9. PubMed ID: 20298252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT, ultrasonography and MRI. Detection of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients.
    An YS; Lee DH; Yoon JK; Lee SJ; Kim TH; Kang DK; Kim KS; Jung YS; Yim H
    Nuklearmedizin; 2014; 53(3):89-94. PubMed ID: 24220324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What Is the Role of Imaging at Primary Diagnostic Work-Up in Uterine Cervical Cancer?
    Haldorsen IS; Lura N; Blaakær J; Fischerova D; Werner HMJ
    Curr Oncol Rep; 2019 Jul; 21(9):77. PubMed ID: 31359169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging.
    Subak LL; Hricak H; Powell CB; Azizi L; Stern JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 86(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 7784021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic lymph-node metastases in patients with early-stage uterine cervical cancer: comparison with MRI findings.
    Lv K; Guo HM; Lu YJ; Wu ZX; Zhang K; Han JK
    Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Dec; 35(12):1204-11. PubMed ID: 25222911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic efficiency of whole-body
    Steiner A; Narva S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Hietanen S; Hynninen J; Virtanen J
    Cancer Imaging; 2021 Jan; 21(1):16. PubMed ID: 33482909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation.
    Ng SH; Yen TC; Liao CT; Chang JT; Chan SC; Ko SF; Wang HM; Wong HF
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Jul; 46(7):1136-43. PubMed ID: 16000282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fusion of PET and MRI for staging of uterine cervical cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced (18)F-FDG PET/CT and pelvic MRI.
    Kitajima K; Suenaga Y; Ueno Y; Kanda T; Maeda T; Deguchi M; Ebina Y; Yamada H; Takahashi S; Sugimura K
    Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(4):464-469. PubMed ID: 24642250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer.
    Havrilesky LJ; Kulasingam SL; Matchar DB; Myers ER
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Apr; 97(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 15790456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The usefulness of MRI and PET imaging for the detection of parametrial involvement and lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer.
    Park W; Park YJ; Huh SJ; Kim BG; Bae DS; Lee J; Kim BH; Choi JY; Ahn YC; Lim DH
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 35(5):260-4. PubMed ID: 15886267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A two-way comparison of whole-body 18FDG PET-CT and whole-body contrast-enhanced MRI for distant metastasis staging in patients with malignant tumors: a meta-analysis of 13 prospective studies.
    Li J; Zhou H; Zhang X; Song F; Pang X; Wei Z
    Ann Palliat Med; 2020 Mar; 9(2):247-255. PubMed ID: 32233618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for posttherapy evaluation in patients with advanced cervical cancer receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
    Su TP; Lin G; Huang YT; Liu FY; Wang CC; Chao A; Chou HH; Yen TC; Lai CH
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 May; 45(5):727-734. PubMed ID: 29159572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study.
    Choi HJ; Roh JW; Seo SS; Lee S; Kim JY; Kim SK; Kang KW; Lee JS; Jeong JY; Park SY
    Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):914-22. PubMed ID: 16411226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is of limited value in primary staging of early stage cervical cancer.
    Driscoll DO; Halpenny D; Johnston C; Sheehy N; Keogan M
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 25015401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating PET-CT in the detection and management of recurrent cervical cancer: systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy and subjective elicitation.
    Meads C; Davenport C; Małysiak S; Kowalska M; Zapalska A; Guest P; Martin-Hirsch P; Borowiack E; Auguste P; Barton P; Roberts T; Khan K; Sundar S
    BJOG; 2014 Mar; 121(4):398-407. PubMed ID: 24299154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Tumor Staging in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer: A Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Grueneisen J; Nagarajah J; Buchbender C; Hoffmann O; Schaarschmidt BM; Poeppel T; Forsting M; Quick HH; Umutlu L; Kinner S
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):505-13. PubMed ID: 26115367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.