282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32415584)
1. Diagnostic performance of conventional and advanced imaging modalities for assessing newly diagnosed cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Woo S; Atun R; Ward ZJ; Scott AM; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5560-5577. PubMed ID: 32415584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comprehensive Comparison of CT, MRI, Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/CT, and Diffusion Weighted Imaging-MRI for Detecting the Lymph Nodes Metastases in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on 67 Studies.
Liu B; Gao S; Li S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 28183074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic performance of MR imaging in evaluating prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.
Xiao M; Yan B; Li Y; Lu J; Qiang J
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1405-1418. PubMed ID: 31776741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis.
Choi HJ; Ju W; Myung SK; Kim Y
Cancer Sci; 2010 Jun; 101(6):1471-9. PubMed ID: 20298252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines).
Fischerová D; Cibula D
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 31213057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT, ultrasonography and MRI. Detection of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients.
An YS; Lee DH; Yoon JK; Lee SJ; Kim TH; Kang DK; Kim KS; Jung YS; Yim H
Nuklearmedizin; 2014; 53(3):89-94. PubMed ID: 24220324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What Is the Role of Imaging at Primary Diagnostic Work-Up in Uterine Cervical Cancer?
Haldorsen IS; Lura N; Blaakær J; Fischerova D; Werner HMJ
Curr Oncol Rep; 2019 Jul; 21(9):77. PubMed ID: 31359169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging.
Subak LL; Hricak H; Powell CB; Azizi L; Stern JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 86(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 7784021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic lymph-node metastases in patients with early-stage uterine cervical cancer: comparison with MRI findings.
Lv K; Guo HM; Lu YJ; Wu ZX; Zhang K; Han JK
Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Dec; 35(12):1204-11. PubMed ID: 25222911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic efficiency of whole-body
Steiner A; Narva S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Hietanen S; Hynninen J; Virtanen J
Cancer Imaging; 2021 Jan; 21(1):16. PubMed ID: 33482909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation.
Ng SH; Yen TC; Liao CT; Chang JT; Chan SC; Ko SF; Wang HM; Wong HF
J Nucl Med; 2005 Jul; 46(7):1136-43. PubMed ID: 16000282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fusion of PET and MRI for staging of uterine cervical cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced (18)F-FDG PET/CT and pelvic MRI.
Kitajima K; Suenaga Y; Ueno Y; Kanda T; Maeda T; Deguchi M; Ebina Y; Yamada H; Takahashi S; Sugimura K
Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(4):464-469. PubMed ID: 24642250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer.
Havrilesky LJ; Kulasingam SL; Matchar DB; Myers ER
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Apr; 97(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 15790456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The usefulness of MRI and PET imaging for the detection of parametrial involvement and lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer.
Park W; Park YJ; Huh SJ; Kim BG; Bae DS; Lee J; Kim BH; Choi JY; Ahn YC; Lim DH
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 35(5):260-4. PubMed ID: 15886267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A two-way comparison of whole-body 18FDG PET-CT and whole-body contrast-enhanced MRI for distant metastasis staging in patients with malignant tumors: a meta-analysis of 13 prospective studies.
Li J; Zhou H; Zhang X; Song F; Pang X; Wei Z
Ann Palliat Med; 2020 Mar; 9(2):247-255. PubMed ID: 32233618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for posttherapy evaluation in patients with advanced cervical cancer receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Su TP; Lin G; Huang YT; Liu FY; Wang CC; Chao A; Chou HH; Yen TC; Lai CH
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 May; 45(5):727-734. PubMed ID: 29159572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study.
Choi HJ; Roh JW; Seo SS; Lee S; Kim JY; Kim SK; Kang KW; Lee JS; Jeong JY; Park SY
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):914-22. PubMed ID: 16411226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is of limited value in primary staging of early stage cervical cancer.
Driscoll DO; Halpenny D; Johnston C; Sheehy N; Keogan M
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 25015401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating PET-CT in the detection and management of recurrent cervical cancer: systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy and subjective elicitation.
Meads C; Davenport C; Małysiak S; Kowalska M; Zapalska A; Guest P; Martin-Hirsch P; Borowiack E; Auguste P; Barton P; Roberts T; Khan K; Sundar S
BJOG; 2014 Mar; 121(4):398-407. PubMed ID: 24299154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Tumor Staging in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer: A Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Grueneisen J; Nagarajah J; Buchbender C; Hoffmann O; Schaarschmidt BM; Poeppel T; Forsting M; Quick HH; Umutlu L; Kinner S
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):505-13. PubMed ID: 26115367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
