169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32415917)
1. An automated machine learning approach to predict brain age from cortical anatomical measures.
Dafflon J; Pinaya WHL; Turkheimer F; Cole JH; Leech R; Harris MA; Cox SR; Whalley HC; McIntosh AM; Hellyer PJ
Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Sep; 41(13):3555-3566. PubMed ID: 32415917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated machine learning based on radiomics features predicts H3 K27M mutation in midline gliomas of the brain.
Su X; Chen N; Sun H; Liu Y; Yang X; Wang W; Zhang S; Tan Q; Su J; Gong Q; Yue Q
Neuro Oncol; 2020 Mar; 22(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 31563963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scaling tree-based automated machine learning to biomedical big data with a feature set selector.
Le TT; Fu W; Moore JH
Bioinformatics; 2020 Jan; 36(1):250-256. PubMed ID: 31165141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct cortical thickness estimation using deep learning-based anatomy segmentation and cortex parcellation.
Rebsamen M; Rummel C; Reyes M; Wiest R; McKinley R
Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Dec; 41(17):4804-4814. PubMed ID: 32786059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Model selection for metabolomics: predicting diagnosis of coronary artery disease using automated machine learning.
Orlenko A; Kofink D; Lyytikäinen LP; Nikus K; Mishra P; Kuukasjärvi P; Karhunen PJ; Kähönen M; Laurikka JO; Lehtimäki T; Asselbergs FW; Moore JH
Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1772-1778. PubMed ID: 31702773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Large-scale evaluation of ANTs and FreeSurfer cortical thickness measurements.
Tustison NJ; Cook PA; Klein A; Song G; Das SR; Duda JT; Kandel BM; van Strien N; Stone JR; Gee JC; Avants BB
Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 99():166-79. PubMed ID: 24879923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Embedding covariate adjustments in tree-based automated machine learning for biomedical big data analyses.
Manduchi E; Fu W; Romano JD; Ruberto S; Moore JH
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Oct; 21(1):430. PubMed ID: 32998684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mitigating site effects in covariance for machine learning in neuroimaging data.
Chen AA; Beer JC; Tustison NJ; Cook PA; Shinohara RT; Shou H;
Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Mar; 43(4):1179-1195. PubMed ID: 34904312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic machine learning based on native T1 mapping can identify myocardial fibrosis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Peng WL; Zhang TJ; Shi K; Li HX; Li Y; He S; Li C; Xia D; Xia CC; Li ZL
Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):1044-1053. PubMed ID: 34477909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inference of social cognition in schizophrenia patients with neurocognitive domains and neurocognitive tests using automated machine learning.
Lin E; Lin CH; Lane HY
Asian J Psychiatr; 2024 Jan; 91():103866. PubMed ID: 38128351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Geometric deep learning on brain shape predicts sex and age.
Besson P; Parrish T; Katsaggelos AK; Bandt SK
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2021 Jul; 91():101939. PubMed ID: 34082280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using Machine Learning and Structural Neuroimaging to Detect First Episode Psychosis: Reconsidering the Evidence.
Vieira S; Gong QY; Pinaya WHL; Scarpazza C; Tognin S; Crespo-Facorro B; Tordesillas-Gutierrez D; Ortiz-García V; Setien-Suero E; Scheepers FE; Van Haren NEM; Marques TR; Murray RM; David A; Dazzan P; McGuire P; Mechelli A
Schizophr Bull; 2020 Jan; 46(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 30809667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparisons of automated machine learning (AutoML) in predicting whistleblowing of academic dishonesty with demographic and theory of planned behavior.
Rahman RA; Masrom S; Mohamad M; Sari EN; Saragih F; Rahman ASA
MethodsX; 2023 Dec; 11():102364. PubMed ID: 37744883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting visual working memory with multimodal magnetic resonance imaging.
Xiao Y; Lin Y; Ma J; Qian J; Ke Z; Li L; Yi Y; Zhang J; ; Dai Z
Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Apr; 42(5):1446-1462. PubMed ID: 33277955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hierarchical Rough-to-Fine Model for Infant Age Prediction Based on Cortical Features.
Hu D; Wu Z; Lin W; Li G; Shen D
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 Jan; 24(1):214-225. PubMed ID: 30716056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hyperparameter Tuning and Pipeline Optimization via Grid Search Method and Tree-Based AutoML in Breast Cancer Prediction.
Radzi SFM; Karim MKA; Saripan MI; Rahman MAA; Isa INC; Ibahim MJ
J Pers Med; 2021 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34683118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Brain Age Prediction Using Six Imaging Modalities on Middle-Aged and Older Adults.
Xiong M; Lin L; Jin Y; Kang W; Wu S; Sun S
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(7):. PubMed ID: 37050682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated machine learning to predict the co-occurrence of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations and O
Zhang S; Sun H; Su X; Yang X; Wang W; Wan X; Tan Q; Chen N; Yue Q; Gong Q
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jul; 54(1):197-205. PubMed ID: 33393131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can we predict subject-specific dynamic cortical thickness maps during infancy from birth?
Meng Y; Li G; Rekik I; Zhang H; Gao Y; Lin W; Shen D
Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Jun; 38(6):2865-2874. PubMed ID: 28295833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated analysis of cortical volume loss predicts seizure outcomes after frontal lobectomy.
Whiting AC; Morita-Sherman M; Li M; Vegh D; Machado de Campos B; Cendes F; Wang X; Bingaman W; Jehi LE
Epilepsia; 2021 May; 62(5):1074-1084. PubMed ID: 33756031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
